Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It doesn't matter what OP is already paying. It's bad form to add new duties that weren't agreed upon up front without increasing compensation. Like it or not, overpaid or not, doing that is a recipe for resentful nanny. OPs realistic choices here are to let the issue go, specify her expectations regarding cooking and offering more pay for more work, or advertise for a new nanny at the same rate clearly laying out her expectations up front.
I don't disagree that for the rate OP is paying that she should be able to have a nanny that cooks. It's simply not realistic to expect her current nanny to happily increase her workload for no extra pay. Do you want someone angry and frustrated with you caring for your kids everyday?
That would work for a machine, but not a child. Look, children grow. Don't nannies know that? Shouldn't they expect that the child will change? What else do you think the nanny should be able to refuse to do because she didn't have to do it before? Potty training? Putting shoes on? Giving purees? Helping the kid go down the slide? Reading? Playing with bigger toys? Taking to activities? This is becoming ridiculous.
All of those have to do with childcare. Extra housekeeping is different.
You don't think feeding a child has anything to do with childcare? Should nannies be paid less for mixing formula bottles too?
PS: Anything related to the child is childcare. Housekeeping refers to things you do for the household and family members OTHER than the child. Doing the child's laundry is not housekeeping, it's the nanny's job. Doing the parents' laundry would be housekeeping.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It doesn't matter what OP is already paying. It's bad form to add new duties that weren't agreed upon up front without increasing compensation. Like it or not, overpaid or not, doing that is a recipe for resentful nanny. OPs realistic choices here are to let the issue go, specify her expectations regarding cooking and offering more pay for more work, or advertise for a new nanny at the same rate clearly laying out her expectations up front.
I don't disagree that for the rate OP is paying that she should be able to have a nanny that cooks. It's simply not realistic to expect her current nanny to happily increase her workload for no extra pay. Do you want someone angry and frustrated with you caring for your kids everyday?
That would work for a machine, but not a child. Look, children grow. Don't nannies know that? Shouldn't they expect that the child will change? What else do you think the nanny should be able to refuse to do because she didn't have to do it before? Potty training? Putting shoes on? Giving purees? Helping the kid go down the slide? Reading? Playing with bigger toys? Taking to activities? This is becoming ridiculous.
All of those have to do with childcare. Extra housekeeping is different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It doesn't matter what OP is already paying. It's bad form to add new duties that weren't agreed upon up front without increasing compensation. Like it or not, overpaid or not, doing that is a recipe for resentful nanny. OPs realistic choices here are to let the issue go, specify her expectations regarding cooking and offering more pay for more work, or advertise for a new nanny at the same rate clearly laying out her expectations up front.
I don't disagree that for the rate OP is paying that she should be able to have a nanny that cooks. It's simply not realistic to expect her current nanny to happily increase her workload for no extra pay. Do you want someone angry and frustrated with you caring for your kids everyday?
That would work for a machine, but not a child. Look, children grow. Don't nannies know that? Shouldn't they expect that the child will change? What else do you think the nanny should be able to refuse to do because she didn't have to do it before? Potty training? Putting shoes on? Giving purees? Helping the kid go down the slide? Reading? Playing with bigger toys? Taking to activities? This is becoming ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:
It doesn't matter what OP is already paying. It's bad form to add new duties that weren't agreed upon up front without increasing compensation. Like it or not, overpaid or not, doing that is a recipe for resentful nanny. OPs realistic choices here are to let the issue go, specify her expectations regarding cooking and offering more pay for more work, or advertise for a new nanny at the same rate clearly laying out her expectations up front.
I don't disagree that for the rate OP is paying that she should be able to have a nanny that cooks. It's simply not realistic to expect her current nanny to happily increase her workload for no extra pay. Do you want someone angry and frustrated with you caring for your kids everyday?
Anonymous wrote:Tell her what to make and provide the imgredients
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nanny here. I love to cook and make all food for my charges from scratch (and we go grocery shopping weekly so that I can get anything I need to make their meals). I use nutritional guidelines from the AAP to plan their meals.
Sounds good to me.
I bet your employer is paying you more than OP is paying her person.
What? Where on earth are you getting this assumption? What is wrong with you that this OP can't ask a legitimate and specific question without being attacked for being an MB instead of a nanny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nanny here. I love to cook and make all food for my charges from scratch (and we go grocery shopping weekly so that I can get anything I need to make their meals). I use nutritional guidelines from the AAP to plan their meals.
Sounds good to me.
I bet your employer is paying you more than OP is paying her person.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nanny here. I love to cook and make all food for my charges from scratch (and we go grocery shopping weekly so that I can get anything I need to make their meals). I use nutritional guidelines from the AAP to plan their meals.
Sounds good to me.
I bet your employer is paying you more than OP is paying her person.
OP here. I suppose pay is certainly relevant to this discussion! We pay $22/hr for one child. Does that change anyone's answer? I feel better after reading some of these replies- and this isn't something we clearly discussed or put in the contract, so I think I'm not going to push it too much.
If you want to, you can offer a few dollars more in exchange for the extra work you want her to do. But put it clearly in your written agreement. You can even do a 30 trial with the extra pay, so you can see if it's worth it to you.
Are you serious? OP is already paying well over market rate for, what sounds like, a mediocre nanny. Why should she offer MORE?
OP, you aren't asking for anything out of the ordinary or over the top here. Many nannies do meal planning, grocery shopping, and cooking from scratch as part of their daily activities and do not expect to be compensated extra for it.
It doesn't matter what OP is already paying. It's bad form to add new duties that weren't agreed upon up front without increasing compensation. Like it or not, overpaid or not, doing that is a recipe for resentful nanny. OPs realistic choices here are to let the issue go, specify her expectations regarding cooking and offering more pay for more work, or advertise for a new nanny at the same rate clearly laying out her expectations up front.
I don't disagree that for the rate OP is paying that she should be able to have a nanny that cooks. It's simply not realistic to expect her current nanny to happily increase her workload for no extra pay. Do you want someone angry and frustrated with you caring for your kids everyday?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nanny here. I love to cook and make all food for my charges from scratch (and we go grocery shopping weekly so that I can get anything I need to make their meals). I use nutritional guidelines from the AAP to plan their meals.
Sounds good to me.
I bet your employer is paying you more than OP is paying her person.
OP here. I suppose pay is certainly relevant to this discussion! We pay $22/hr for one child. Does that change anyone's answer? I feel better after reading some of these replies- and this isn't something we clearly discussed or put in the contract, so I think I'm not going to push it too much.
You have one lazy, overpaid nanny OP.
Talk to your friends with nannies to get enlightened. Dcum has too much overexaggerated BS.
Our nanny was paid $15-19/hour over our five years and always made healthy food for our children.
Bethesda.
Does she have any cheap friends?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nanny here. I love to cook and make all food for my charges from scratch (and we go grocery shopping weekly so that I can get anything I need to make their meals). I use nutritional guidelines from the AAP to plan their meals.
Sounds good to me.
I bet your employer is paying you more than OP is paying her person.
OP here. I suppose pay is certainly relevant to this discussion! We pay $22/hr for one child. Does that change anyone's answer? I feel better after reading some of these replies- and this isn't something we clearly discussed or put in the contract, so I think I'm not going to push it too much.
If you want to, you can offer a few dollars more in exchange for the extra work you want her to do. But put it clearly in your written agreement. You can even do a 30 trial with the extra pay, so you can see if it's worth it to you.
Are you serious? OP is already paying well over market rate for, what sounds like, a mediocre nanny. Why should she offer MORE?
OP, you aren't asking for anything out of the ordinary or over the top here. Many nannies do meal planning, grocery shopping, and cooking from scratch as part of their daily activities and do not expect to be compensated extra for it.
It doesn't matter what OP is already paying. It's bad form to add new duties that weren't agreed upon up front without increasing compensation. Like it or not, overpaid or not, doing that is a recipe for resentful nanny. OPs realistic choices here are to let the issue go, specify her expectations regarding cooking and offering more pay for more work, or advertise for a new nanny at the same rate clearly laying out her expectations up front.
I don't disagree that for the rate OP is paying that she should be able to have a nanny that cooks. It's simply not realistic to expect her current nanny to happily increase her workload for no extra pay. Do you want someone angry and frustrated with you caring for your kids everyday?