Anonymous wrote:What are nannies asking for two-infant shares in DC? I've heard wide ranges -- $20-25 p/hour, with $20 being VERY low and $25 for the most experienced, best nannies.
Any thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:True story. I had a family once proposed to pay me a weekly wage on the 15 and 30 of the month because that's when mb gets paid looool. So the scenario would play out like this. I work 2 weeks in a row and the fifteen is not until Tuesday of the third week so I would work two extra days free and it would be counted in the previous two weeks. I told them I know how to count days and use a calendar. They were like have been paying our previous nanny this way it's not a problem. I told them then you owe her money. You either pay me every two Friday's or an hourly wage every 15 or 30 of the month with all my hours counted plus any over time. We ended up going with weekly hours every Friday. People are out to cheat others in this business.
Anonymous wrote:OP here, many thanks for the PPs that shared their info. FWIW, every person we interviewed (and we interviewed many) asked for $22 an hour. In addition, many seemed put off by the difficulty of caring for two infants.
Anonymous wrote:There is nothing illegal about expressing a pay rate in terms of the average as long as the hours are agreed upon in advance. If you tried to bring a lawsuit alleging that, it would be dismissed and you would be sanctioned for pursuing a frivolous claim. Stop trying to scare nannies away from families paying good, market rates with an agreed-upon number of hours - expressing the rate as an average can actually be helpful to both parties (again, as long as the hours are agreed upon -- which means no one is getting cheated).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the contract specifies a number of hours, what exactly is the harm caused by stating the hourly rate in terms of an average?
Because average rate isn't legal, base and OT rates are. Additionally, many families seem to feel than occasional extra OT hours should be paid at that blended rate...
Anonymous wrote:If the contract specifies a number of hours, what exactly is the harm caused by stating the hourly rate in terms of an average?