Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:okay. Sorry I offended you.
But I don't see a difference between saying the "autistic child" or "the child with autisim".
When we work in a clinic and are talking about patients to our co workers we often say the adhd patient or the delayed patient or the pain management patient. It's not about defining them or offending them. It's just how we identify them. I wouldn't walk around calling a charge "the adhd child" but that is what he is. He is adhd child with adhd and that is a huge impact in his life.
I'm sure it is a touchy subject for you and I'm sorry it upsets you. I just want you to understand I'm nit trying to offend you or "define" him by his disease.
Not the PP, but it would be kind of like saying the child is cancerous instead of the child has cancer...you see?
I'm not sure nannying is the best fit for you (and really won't do much of anything to help you further a career in midwifery if that's what you want to do, unless you work strictly with newborns).
I see my MB maybe 15 minutes a week out of the 50 hours I am at her house. You're not going to be spending much time with parents if you work as a nanny.
I disagree.. Midwifery is not all about newborns. It is actually mostly about the mother. I think nannying would be great experience because I will learn how to really connect with and communicate with parents. Also I love being around children and I have an interest in teaching/tutoring. If I didn't fall in love with the idea of midwifery I would be going to school to be a teacher instead. So I think it is a relevant job for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:okay. Sorry I offended you.
But I don't see a difference between saying the "autistic child" or "the child with autisim".
When we work in a clinic and are talking about patients to our co workers we often say the adhd patient or the delayed patient or the pain management patient. It's not about defining them or offending them. It's just how we identify them. I wouldn't walk around calling a charge "the adhd child" but that is what he is. He is adhd child with adhd and that is a huge impact in his life.
I'm sure it is a touchy subject for you and I'm sorry it upsets you. I just want you to understand I'm nit trying to offend you or "define" him by his disease.
Not the PP, but it would be kind of like saying the child is cancerous instead of the child has cancer...you see?
I'm not sure nannying is the best fit for you (and really won't do much of anything to help you further a career in midwifery if that's what you want to do, unless you work strictly with newborns).
I disagree.. Midwifery is not all about newborns. It is actually mostly about the mother. I think nannying would be great experience because I will learn how to really connect with and communicate with parents. Also I love being around children and I have an interest in teaching/tutoring. If I didn't fall in love with the idea of midwifery I would be going to school to be a teacher instead. So I think it is a relevant job for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:okay. Sorry I offended you.
But I don't see a difference between saying the "autistic child" or "the child with autisim".
When we work in a clinic and are talking about patients to our co workers we often say the adhd patient or the delayed patient or the pain management patient. It's not about defining them or offending them. It's just how we identify them. I wouldn't walk around calling a charge "the adhd child" but that is what he is. He is adhd child with adhd and that is a huge impact in his life.
I'm sure it is a touchy subject for you and I'm sorry it upsets you. I just want you to understand I'm nit trying to offend you or "define" him by his disease.
Not the PP, but it would be kind of like saying the child is cancerous instead of the child has cancer...you see?
I'm not sure nannying is the best fit for you (and really won't do much of anything to help you further a career in midwifery if that's what you want to do, unless you work strictly with newborns).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:okay. Sorry I offended you.
But I don't see a difference between saying the "autistic child" or "the child with autisim".
When we work in a clinic and are talking about patients to our co workers we often say the adhd patient or the delayed patient or the pain management patient. It's not about defining them or offending them. It's just how we identify them. I wouldn't walk around calling a charge "the adhd child" but that is what he is. He is adhd child with adhd and that is a huge impact in his life.
I'm sure it is a touchy subject for you and I'm sorry it upsets you. I just want you to understand I'm nit trying to offend you or "define" him by his disease.
You are going to have a lot of issues connecting with clients if you use this type of sterile thought process when speaking about children. The more you respond, the more I believe nannying is not going to be a good fit for you. If I were you, I'd start looking at working at a birthing center or hospital. Those types of positions would be a better fit for your future career plans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:okay. Sorry I offended you.
But I don't see a difference between saying the "autistic child" or "the child with autisim".
When we work in a clinic and are talking about patients to our co workers we often say the adhd patient or the delayed patient or the pain management patient. It's not about defining them or offending them. It's just how we identify them. I wouldn't walk around calling a charge "the adhd child" but that is what he is. He is adhd child with adhd and that is a huge impact in his life.
I'm sure it is a touchy subject for you and I'm sorry it upsets you. I just want you to understand I'm nit trying to offend you or "define" him by his disease.
Not the PP, but it would be kind of like saying the child is cancerous instead of the child has cancer...you see?
I'm not sure nannying is the best fit for you (and really won't do much of anything to help you further a career in midwifery if that's what you want to do, unless you work strictly with newborns).
Anonymous wrote:okay. Sorry I offended you.
But I don't see a difference between saying the "autistic child" or "the child with autisim".
When we work in a clinic and are talking about patients to our co workers we often say the adhd patient or the delayed patient or the pain management patient. It's not about defining them or offending them. It's just how we identify them. I wouldn't walk around calling a charge "the adhd child" but that is what he is. He is adhd child with adhd and that is a huge impact in his life.
I'm sure it is a touchy subject for you and I'm sorry it upsets you. I just want you to understand I'm nit trying to offend you or "define" him by his disease.
Anonymous wrote:okay. Sorry I offended you.
But I don't see a difference between saying the "autistic child" or "the child with autisim".
When we work in a clinic and are talking about patients to our co workers we often say the adhd patient or the delayed patient or the pain management patient. It's not about defining them or offending them. It's just how we identify them. I wouldn't walk around calling a charge "the adhd child" but that is what he is. He is adhd child with adhd and that is a huge impact in his life.
I'm sure it is a touchy subject for you and I'm sorry it upsets you. I just want you to understand I'm nit trying to offend you or "define" him by his disease.