Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go to work, OP, and stop your nonsense and melodrama. They have the flu not bubonic plague. Caring for our charges when they are sick is this is a part of our jobs, like it or not.
If they really have the actual flu, I don't think OP should go. The flu effects everyone differently and can in fact be VERY serious. Caring for kids with colds or common childhood illnesses is one thing, but the flu is different. Are OP's employers going to pay for her medical bills if she needs to be hospitalized? The flu can knock you out for up to 2 weeks, it's stupid of them to ask her to expose herself.
Driving can be VERY SERIOUS too. Nanny could get in an accident and DIE! But then on the other hand the bus could crash and nanny could die. So could the metro. You know what, even walking isn't that safe, someone could run up on the curb and hit nanny. It's probably best if nanny just stays home and keeps getting paid, we wouldn't want to risk anything happening.
Stop being a smart ass, the comparisons you give are ridiculous. They know they have the flu, why would they want to expose their healthy nanny to it when they are home? Then they would have to miss more work when the nanny gets sick.
If the kids already had the flu there is no reason for her to stay home when she gets it. Think Einstein. The kids can't get it again.
Anonymous wrote:If you worked at all this week then you e already been exposed. Parents have nannies vs day care so they have someone to watch their child when sick. Yes the flu can be serious but if you wash your hands, avoid kisses, having them cough or sneeze on you you will limit exposure also the flu shot would be good to have to protect you, you could still get the flu but it lessens the effects.
I won't work with kids that have pneumonia or are vomiting a lot but that's due to the risk of them getting dehydrated and needing a dr asap which is easier for the parents to get done.
I know people confuse the flu with a stomach bug so just to be clear the flu is like a cold but worse fever, body aches, cough stuffy nose, vomiting is rare and usually only infants and in young children or the elderly. Yes this was necessary to point out because I see it posted a lot on here and FB a nanny complaining their charge has the flu when it's really a stomach bug and people need to know the difference
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go to work, OP, and stop your nonsense and melodrama. They have the flu not bubonic plague. Caring for our charges when they are sick is this is a part of our jobs, like it or not.
If they really have the actual flu, I don't think OP should go. The flu effects everyone differently and can in fact be VERY serious. Caring for kids with colds or common childhood illnesses is one thing, but the flu is different. Are OP's employers going to pay for her medical bills if she needs to be hospitalized? The flu can knock you out for up to 2 weeks, it's stupid of them to ask her to expose herself.
Driving can be VERY SERIOUS too. Nanny could get in an accident and DIE! But then on the other hand the bus could crash and nanny could die. So could the metro. You know what, even walking isn't that safe, someone could run up on the curb and hit nanny. It's probably best if nanny just stays home and keeps getting paid, we wouldn't want to risk anything happening.
Stop being a smart ass, the comparisons you give are ridiculous. They know they have the flu, why would they want to expose their healthy nanny to it when they are home? Then they would have to miss more work when the nanny gets sick.
If the kids already had the flu there is no reason for her to stay home when she gets it. Think Einstein. The kids can't get it again.
So the nanny has to come to work while sick with the flu now too. You are either a really evil employer or a nanny who has been taken advantage of a lot. If the latter please know that there are good families out there to work for.