Anonymous wrote:I think OP is actually being very generous with pay and benefits. Nannies in this area complain that the wages are too low. There is one MB on this board that is only willing to pay 30k for a non live in for two kids. 80k is a huge amount of money, especially since it's only a 4.5 day job, and food is paid for during those days. That's like an extra $50 a day. Nannies are unskilled labor, no education needed- and to get 80k is amazing! I have a law degree, and I didn't get a job paying over 80k in this area until 7 years after law school.
Anonymous wrote:I think you will find many great candidates at $300 in this area!!! That is a lot of money for just playing with a kid and sleeping.
Anonymous wrote:OP here- thanks again for the responses. We just moved from NY where a 24hr/ or 5 day live in (2 day live out) was very was very common. The pay rate there was 200-500 a day. So I thought 300+ was being very generous especially in this area that is not as expensive as NY. I think if I gave a flat rate for the overnights, I would have to do that off the books, correct? Because on payroll it wouldn't match up with hourly pay and base rate.
My partner and I have overlapping working schedules, and I have a sleeping condition what makes it necessary or convenient to have someone else here.
I'm not paying a horrible wage- it's one child, who is sleeping for 15hrs (with naps) of a 24hr period. If I raised the salary to $85,000- would this be more appealing?
Anonymous wrote:OP here- thanks again for the responses. We just moved from NY where a 24hr/ or 5 day live in (2 day live out) was very was very common. The pay rate there was 200-500 a day. So I thought 300+ was being very generous especially in this area that is not as expensive as NY. I think if I gave a flat rate for the overnights, I would have to do that off the books, correct? Because on payroll it wouldn't match up with hourly pay and base rate.
My partner and I have overlapping working schedules, and I have a sleeping condition what makes it necessary or convenient to have someone else here.
I'm not paying a horrible wage- it's one child, who is sleeping for 15hrs (with naps) of a 24hr period. If I raised the salary to $85,000- would this be more appealing?
Anonymous wrote:Thanks in most part for the responses thus far.
We are currently unable to have someone live-in on the weekend. Yes this is a technically a 24hr/4.5 day position. But my LO, 9/10 nights will sleep without a peep! If she does wake-up and the nanny has to tend to her, I will pay for that time. But under the law, if she is able to sleep 8hrs uninterrupted, I am able to to pay her only for 16hrs out of 24hr period. The DOL made this very clear.
Thank goodness for that stipulation, because we probably could not afford to offer such a good rate 24 hours a day.
Is this considered a live-in or live-out position?
Reading many posts, it appears that $20 for one child is pretty great. She will have no other housekeeping duties, only after the child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If she has her own residence she is a live-out nanny.
+1. If she is required to maintain a separate residence, she is considered a live-out nanny who is on duty 24hours/day; 4.5 days/week. Overtime is required by law, though I believe you are allotted the 8 hours of no pay if baby doesn't wake. You should be paying an on call fee, but legally do not have to. Your annual salary is a bit low for what you are asking.