Anonymous wrote:Sorry. You are nuts. A job paying $750/wk for 50 hours is paying the same amount whether you discuss the average rate, weekly rate, base rate, or OT rate. If you accept this job, you have no basis to complain unless you are not paid the proper rate for your 51st hour.
Becoming aware of the OT requirement doesn't mean you suddenly deserve to earn more or that you are not bring paid enough. It means you now know how to describe your pay in a different way.
Mb's didn't make up the concept of averages. It's 4th grade math.
Anonymous wrote:The law does not require paying "an arm and a leg" nor does it exist to make employers "think long and hard" before requiring OT. It exists to ensure fair compensation for hours worked beyond 40 per week. It is not a value judgement on (or a punishment for) employers who require a more than 40 hour week.
You seem to think that all humans are entitled to work no more than 40 hours per week, and that anything beyond that is an infringement on basic human rights. You're seemingly missing the point that these are agreed-upon hours. Families offer a job with a certain amount of OT and a certain amount of pay taking into account the total hours to be worked. Nannies are free to accept or decline the offer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is one of the issues where this board (or one nanny) is most unreliable. Every nanny that I interviewed reported her average rate when asked about her previous salary. Not one ever reported her base rate. The nannies were far more interested in the weekly pay than the hourly rate.
I agree fully that the contract should specify actual base and OT rates but when you are negotiating its best to talk in terms of average rate. This is also what the employers share on this board. I suspect that one bad nanny want people to think that 50 hours a week @15 is much more than $750 a week..always trying to falsely jack up the rates.
Yes, this is exactly right.
By your logic, why exactly would a nanny take a your 50-60 hour job over a 40, when apparently higher hours don't pay that much more, I miss dinner with my kid, have to wake up at the crack of dawn, don't get home until after its dark, etc. Why would anyone do that, if not for good money. No one is trying to falsely jack up rates. I'm telling my experience, just as you are telling yours, but I guarantee I have been on more nanny interviews than you, and personally know more nannies than the maybe 4 you interviewed. Of course however, because you are an MB your experience is the "truth" and all the nannies that disagree are liars. When I negotiate a job, I do quote a weekly rate. But that rate encompasses what I deem an appropriate hourly rate and the OT. I'm not going to work for $10/hour just because you work like a dog and want me to work like one to but would rather not pay the arm and leg the law requires. OT is meant to make you think long and hard before asking an employee to work beyond a reasonable schedule. 60 hours IS unreasonable no matter how many of you lawyers do it. I'm sure you see it reflected in your obscene paychecks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is one of the issues where this board (or one nanny) is most unreliable. Every nanny that I interviewed reported her average rate when asked about her previous salary. Not one ever reported her base rate. The nannies were far more interested in the weekly pay than the hourly rate.
I agree fully that the contract should specify actual base and OT rates but when you are negotiating its best to talk in terms of average rate. This is also what the employers share on this board. I suspect that one bad nanny want people to think that 50 hours a week @15 is much more than $750 a week..always trying to falsely jack up the rates.
Yes, this is exactly right.
Anonymous wrote:This is one of the issues where this board (or one nanny) is most unreliable. Every nanny that I interviewed reported her average rate when asked about her previous salary. Not one ever reported her base rate. The nannies were far more interested in the weekly pay than the hourly rate.
I agree fully that the contract should specify actual base and OT rates but when you are negotiating its best to talk in terms of average rate. This is also what the employers share on this board. I suspect that one bad nanny want people to think that 50 hours a week @15 is much more than $750 a week..always trying to falsely jack up the rates.
Anonymous wrote:This is one of the issues where this board (or one nanny) is most unreliable. Every nanny that I interviewed reported her average rate when asked about her previous salary. Not one ever reported her base rate. The nannies were far more interested in the weekly pay than the hourly rate.
I agree fully that the contract should specify actual base and OT rates but when you are negotiating its best to talk in terms of average rate. This is also what the employers share on this board. I suspect that one bad nanny want people to think that 50 hours a week @15 is much more than $750 a week..always trying to falsely jack up the rates.
Anonymous wrote:"We needed 50 hours of child care. When we were interviewing nanny's we always stated that we needed a minimum of 40 hours (Mon. - Thu) at $15/hr and that we had a part-time sitter in who could pick up the extra 10 hrs on Friday. We simply don't have the money to pay time and a half for the extra ten hours. We gave the option though for the full-time nanny to pick up those extra 10 hours at an "average" of $15/hr for the week. Every one of the 7 nanny's we interviewed wanted the extra 10 hours even though we weren't technically paying time and a half. When we wrote up the final contract we made it legal - $750 for a maximum of 50hrs per week. "
Entirely appropriate and as you note, PP, apparently a very attractive offer to all your candidates since everyone said they preferred this arrangement to the 40 hr a week one.
Anonymous wrote:I don't pay my nanny OT and she works 50+ hours/week. She's happy (She's been with us for several years and my children adore her), we're happy.
Anonymous wrote:What kind of cheap patent screwz their nanny for a few dollars OT. If you can't afford to pay OT then you should cut back on eberything tlse so you can pay your child's csregiver legally. You should be repirtex.