Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I am an MB w/ a long-term nanny so I may not understand the whole au pair world, but it seems rather silly and petty to me that a parent would begrudge someone extra time off if they were around to stay w/ their children. I actually like being able to send my nanny home early b/c it means I can spend more time w/ my children. With two working parents any time we can spend with our children we do. I wouldn't spend any energy sending passive aggressive messages to my au pair and just do what works/is right for my family.
Maybe you didn't mean it like I took it but your post kind of illustrates why I feel guilty for using 45 hours and resent that. Of note, I have 3 kids under 6 (6, 4 and 3 to be exact). I work fulltime, so does my husband and we have no free help in the area (grandparents etc.).
When I have a federal holiday, I have our AP work because it is finally a day where I can relax, take care of somethings etc. Otherwise, it is ALWAYS me (and husband) taking care of the kids: mornings, evenings, weekends. I am not a machine and would soo much like a break sometimes. But you make me feel guilty because I sound like I don't want to spend extra time with my kids when I spent all of my none-working hours with them (excluding sleep).
Generally, when you have children, this is how life is. You don't get a special prize for taking care of your children when you are not at work.
Why so nasty? This poster wasn't asking for a "special prize" or even any sympathy. She was simply saying that one of the reasons she has an au pair is not only for childcare during work purposes, but also so she can get some me time. You have no idea how much of a break her au pair gets or how her au pair feels about the situation based on her tiny paragraph.
Did you even read her post? From it we can gather that 1) she feels guilty and resents being made to feel that way by posters who disagreed with her actions, 2) she feels that the expectation that she care for the children she chose to have mornings evenings and weekends is some Herculean task that only machines can do, and 3) that her AP does not get a break on holidays because HM needs the break, not her, from all the not child-caring she already does. You're right though, you cannot gather how the AP feels about situation, though I'm sure she is thrilled about it. Everyone loves working, while watching their boss kick back eating bon bons lamenting about how hard they work. Just thrilled.
PP, there's obviously a balance. And your approach of being nasty and sarcastic and basically purporting that if you want to be away from your kids for even a minute, then you shouldn't have been a mom is just unrealistic and unhelpful. I can appreciate some of what you're saying, but man, if you'd say it in a voice that was even a little kind, you'd get your point across much more successfully. I don't think the posters are reacting with defensiveness to your points, they're reacting with defensiveness to your sarcasm and meanness.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I am an MB w/ a long-term nanny so I may not understand the whole au pair world, but it seems rather silly and petty to me that a parent would begrudge someone extra time off if they were around to stay w/ their children. I actually like being able to send my nanny home early b/c it means I can spend more time w/ my children. With two working parents any time we can spend with our children we do. I wouldn't spend any energy sending passive aggressive messages to my au pair and just do what works/is right for my family.
Maybe you didn't mean it like I took it but your post kind of illustrates why I feel guilty for using 45 hours and resent that. Of note, I have 3 kids under 6 (6, 4 and 3 to be exact). I work fulltime, so does my husband and we have no free help in the area (grandparents etc.).
When I have a federal holiday, I have our AP work because it is finally a day where I can relax, take care of somethings etc. Otherwise, it is ALWAYS me (and husband) taking care of the kids: mornings, evenings, weekends. I am not a machine and would soo much like a break sometimes. But you make me feel guilty because I sound like I don't want to spend extra time with my kids when I spent all of my none-working hours with them (excluding sleep).
Generally, when you have children, this is how life is. You don't get a special prize for taking care of your children when you are not at work.
Why so nasty? This poster wasn't asking for a "special prize" or even any sympathy. She was simply saying that one of the reasons she has an au pair is not only for childcare during work purposes, but also so she can get some me time. You have no idea how much of a break her au pair gets or how her au pair feels about the situation based on her tiny paragraph.
Did you even read her post? From it we can gather that 1) she feels guilty and resents being made to feel that way by posters who disagreed with her actions, 2) she feels that the expectation that she care for the children she chose to have mornings evenings and weekends is some Herculean task that only machines can do, and 3) that her AP does not get a break on holidays because HM needs the break, not her, from all the not child-caring she already does. You're right though, you cannot gather how the AP feels about situation, though I'm sure she is thrilled about it. Everyone loves working, while watching their boss kick back eating bon bons lamenting about how hard they work. Just thrilled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I am an MB w/ a long-term nanny so I may not understand the whole au pair world, but it seems rather silly and petty to me that a parent would begrudge someone extra time off if they were around to stay w/ their children. I actually like being able to send my nanny home early b/c it means I can spend more time w/ my children. With two working parents any time we can spend with our children we do. I wouldn't spend any energy sending passive aggressive messages to my au pair and just do what works/is right for my family.
Maybe you didn't mean it like I took it but your post kind of illustrates why I feel guilty for using 45 hours and resent that. Of note, I have 3 kids under 6 (6, 4 and 3 to be exact). I work fulltime, so does my husband and we have no free help in the area (grandparents etc.).
When I have a federal holiday, I have our AP work because it is finally a day where I can relax, take care of somethings etc. Otherwise, it is ALWAYS me (and husband) taking care of the kids: mornings, evenings, weekends. I am not a machine and would soo much like a break sometimes. But you make me feel guilty because I sound like I don't want to spend extra time with my kids when I spent all of my none-working hours with them (excluding sleep).
Generally, when you have children, this is how life is. You don't get a special prize for taking care of your children when you are not at work.
Why so nasty? This poster wasn't asking for a "special prize" or even any sympathy. She was simply saying that one of the reasons she has an au pair is not only for childcare during work purposes, but also so she can get some me time. You have no idea how much of a break her au pair gets or how her au pair feels about the situation based on her tiny paragraph.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I am an MB w/ a long-term nanny so I may not understand the whole au pair world, but it seems rather silly and petty to me that a parent would begrudge someone extra time off if they were around to stay w/ their children. I actually like being able to send my nanny home early b/c it means I can spend more time w/ my children. With two working parents any time we can spend with our children we do. I wouldn't spend any energy sending passive aggressive messages to my au pair and just do what works/is right for my family.
Maybe you didn't mean it like I took it but your post kind of illustrates why I feel guilty for using 45 hours and resent that. Of note, I have 3 kids under 6 (6, 4 and 3 to be exact). I work fulltime, so does my husband and we have no free help in the area (grandparents etc.).
When I have a federal holiday, I have our AP work because it is finally a day where I can relax, take care of somethings etc. Otherwise, it is ALWAYS me (and husband) taking care of the kids: mornings, evenings, weekends. I am not a machine and would soo much like a break sometimes. But you make me feel guilty because I sound like I don't want to spend extra time with my kids when I spent all of my none-working hours with them (excluding sleep).
Generally, when you have children, this is how life is. You don't get a special prize for taking care of your children when you are not at work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No its not just one poster. Love the fact that you all can never defend the practice, you just try to shut up the dissenters. But I wouldn't want to ruin your discussion, apologies.
Do you know how many times I personally have defended what compensation au pairs receive with actual facts and numbers? I'm sick of doing it which is why I stopped engaging with you on this thread. I have detailed so so many times how much it costs to have an au pair (hint: way more than $5/hour!) and how much time it takes to manage one. I have given actual experiences and numbers. You don't even identify yourself as anyone who knows anything other than the very basics about the program and inflammatory statements.
So I disagree that we don't defend ourselves. I've tried and you are the one who fails to listen to reason or at the very last offer facts of your own.
I'm not talking about how much YOU pay, I'm talking about what THEY make. There is a difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I am an MB w/ a long-term nanny so I may not understand the whole au pair world, but it seems rather silly and petty to me that a parent would begrudge someone extra time off if they were around to stay w/ their children. I actually like being able to send my nanny home early b/c it means I can spend more time w/ my children. With two working parents any time we can spend with our children we do. I wouldn't spend any energy sending passive aggressive messages to my au pair and just do what works/is right for my family.
Maybe you didn't mean it like I took it but your post kind of illustrates why I feel guilty for using 45 hours and resent that. Of note, I have 3 kids under 6 (6, 4 and 3 to be exact). I work fulltime, so does my husband and we have no free help in the area (grandparents etc.).
When I have a federal holiday, I have our AP work because it is finally a day where I can relax, take care of somethings etc. Otherwise, it is ALWAYS me (and husband) taking care of the kids: mornings, evenings, weekends. I am not a machine and would soo much like a break sometimes. But you make me feel guilty because I sound like I don't want to spend extra time with my kids when I spent all of my none-working hours with them (excluding sleep).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I am an MB w/ a long-term nanny so I may not understand the whole au pair world, but it seems rather silly and petty to me that a parent would begrudge someone extra time off if they were around to stay w/ their children. I actually like being able to send my nanny home early b/c it means I can spend more time w/ my children. With two working parents any time we can spend with our children we do. I wouldn't spend any energy sending passive aggressive messages to my au pair and just do what works/is right for my family.
Maybe you didn't mean it like I took it but your post kind of illustrates why I feel guilty for using 45 hours and resent that. Of note, I have 3 kids under 6 (6, 4 and 3 to be exact). I work fulltime, so does my husband and we have no free help in the area (grandparents etc.).
When I have a federal holiday, I have our AP work because it is finally a day where I can relax, take care of somethings etc. Otherwise, it is ALWAYS me (and husband) taking care of the kids: mornings, evenings, weekends. I am not a machine and would soo much like a break sometimes. But you make me feel guilty because I sound like I don't want to spend extra time with my kids when I spent all of my none-working hours with them (excluding sleep).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No its not just one poster. Love the fact that you all can never defend the practice, you just try to shut up the dissenters. But I wouldn't want to ruin your discussion, apologies.
Do you know how many times I personally have defended what compensation au pairs receive with actual facts and numbers? I'm sick of doing it which is why I stopped engaging with you on this thread. I have detailed so so many times how much it costs to have an au pair (hint: way more than $5/hour!) and how much time it takes to manage one. I have given actual experiences and numbers. You don't even identify yourself as anyone who knows anything other than the very basics about the program and inflammatory statements.
So I disagree that we don't defend ourselves. I've tried and you are the one who fails to listen to reason or at the very last offer facts of your own.
I'm not talking about how much YOU pay, I'm talking about what THEY make. There is a difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No its not just one poster. Love the fact that you all can never defend the practice, you just try to shut up the dissenters. But I wouldn't want to ruin your discussion, apologies.
Do you know how many times I personally have defended what compensation au pairs receive with actual facts and numbers? I'm sick of doing it which is why I stopped engaging with you on this thread. I have detailed so so many times how much it costs to have an au pair (hint: way more than $5/hour!) and how much time it takes to manage one. I have given actual experiences and numbers. You don't even identify yourself as anyone who knows anything other than the very basics about the program and inflammatory statements.
So I disagree that we don't defend ourselves. I've tried and you are the one who fails to listen to reason or at the very last offer facts of your own.
Anonymous wrote:No its not just one poster. Love the fact that you all can never defend the practice, you just try to shut up the dissenters. But I wouldn't want to ruin your discussion, apologies.
Anonymous wrote:Whatever, PP. You're counting only the weekly stipend and dividing it by 45, totally ignoring all the other costs host families incur. There is no host family paying within the rules of the program that can get their au pair for your "less than $5/hour." Even the $8,000 agency fee aside, you can't get to less than $5/hour. It shows that you're completely unfamiliar with the program and/or trying to start a fight.
And don't write off the inconvenience to host families of having to live with someone. I am simply not going to provide someone with room and board and pay them the same amount of money as I would someone that doesn't live with us. It doesn't make sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I am an MB w/ a long-term nanny so I may not understand the whole au pair world, but it seems rather silly and petty to me that a parent would begrudge someone extra time off if they were around to stay w/ their children. I actually like being able to send my nanny home early b/c it means I can spend more time w/ my children. With two working parents any time we can spend with our children we do. I wouldn't spend any energy sending passive aggressive messages to my au pair and just do what works/is right for my family.
Maybe you didn't mean it like I took it but your post kind of illustrates why I feel guilty for using 45 hours and resent that. Of note, I have 3 kids under 6 (6, 4 and 3 to be exact). I work fulltime, so does my husband and we have no free help in the area (grandparents etc.).
When I have a federal holiday, I have our AP work because it is finally a day where I can relax, take care of somethings etc. Otherwise, it is ALWAYS me (and husband) taking care of the kids: mornings, evenings, weekends. I am not a machine and would soo much like a break sometimes. But you make me feel guilty because I sound like I don't want to spend extra time with my kids when I spent all of my none-working hours with them (excluding sleep).
Your AP may want a break occasionally as well. Just saying. I'm sorry I just don't get the whole " wah, I decided to work and have young kids, and wah its hard work, and wah my husband and I actually have to take care of them". No one dropped these kids at your doorstep.
Yeah because au pairs never get a break. They work 45 hours a week MAX. Which means they have 123 free hours a week to have a break. No one's whining - we're just saying that it's not a mandate that you give your au pair absolutely every second off that you're not working at the expense of your own sanity.
45 hours a week is a lot to ask of someone you are barely paying, IMHO. You don't need to give her off every second off that you get off, and I don't think anyone said that. But there is a middle ground between giving off every second you have off, and using all 45 hours each week just to use them and making your AP work every holiday because for some reason you think its so awful that you and your husband have to take care of the kids you birthed when you're home. What a strange statement to make.
We've had this conversation a million times, but au pairs are not "barely paid." I posted earlier that I don't the OP is taking the right approach by literally making up hours that she really doesn't need her, but don't make people feel guilty for wanting me time. Yes, we chose to have kids. But that doesn't mean we need to feel guilty for every second we're away from them, and you strongly suggested otherwise in your "no one dropped these kids at your doorstep" post.