Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you haven't read many threads here and therefore didn't know about the consensus here, why would you think that nannies here would jump down your throat? What could have led you to such an assumption?
Not the OP, but I discovered this forum two days ago and while it's super entertaining and informative, the level of discussion on here is on par with a high school cafeteria. Everybody jumps at everybody else, makes wildest assumptions and always, always thinks the worst of the people in any situation described.
And people do get defensive when they get called names for three pages, that's just human nature.
+1. I've been on DCUM enough to know this is pretty standard here. Know one here really knows OP and lots of people called her and her husband all sorts of names. Why wouldn't she get defensive?
"Cue the nannies saying two weeks bonus is crap"? That's an awfully specific insult to toss out there and makes OP sound like a nasty piece of work. Sure the "discussion" here is antagonistic and juvenile but it's no different than the rest of DCUM...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you haven't read many threads here and therefore didn't know about the consensus here, why would you think that nannies here would jump down your throat? What could have led you to such an assumption?
Not the OP, but I discovered this forum two days ago and while it's super entertaining and informative, the level of discussion on here is on par with a high school cafeteria. Everybody jumps at everybody else, makes wildest assumptions and always, always thinks the worst of the people in any situation described.
And people do get defensive when they get called names for three pages, that's just human nature.
+1. I've been on DCUM enough to know this is pretty standard here. Know one here really knows OP and lots of people called her and her husband all sorts of names. Why wouldn't she get defensive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you haven't read many threads here and therefore didn't know about the consensus here, why would you think that nannies here would jump down your throat? What could have led you to such an assumption?
Not the OP, but I discovered this forum two days ago and while it's super entertaining and informative, the level of discussion on here is on par with a high school cafeteria. Everybody jumps at everybody else, makes wildest assumptions and always, always thinks the worst of the people in any situation described.
And people do get defensive when they get called names for three pages, that's just human nature.
Anonymous wrote:If you haven't read many threads here and therefore didn't know about the consensus here, why would you think that nannies here would jump down your throat? What could have led you to such an assumption?
Anonymous wrote:OP here.
I checked this thread again after the first few replies (which confirmed my leanings) and then I went out and bought the same carseat that night. I didn't think anything of it until I found today that apparently people are still replying to this thread, appalled at me and my DH.
There are a lots of assumptions being thrown out, but I will only address a couple.
First, I had no intention other than to reimburse her for the car seat. I was not "entertaining" making her pay for it.
Second, my husband briefly thought about asking her to claim the car seat if she was going to put a claim in to her insurance (but not if she didn't, we were not going to make her insurance rates go up solely because of our car seat) or to ask her to pay partially for the carseat because we are actually otherwise quite generous to her.
She is a part-time nanny who only works about 2/3 of the hours she actually gets paid for, and we maintained her position for her earlier this year after not needing her anymore (new preschool is full day, previous required aftercare) because she was so distraught about having to look for a new job. We paid her for the two days she couldn't work because of the stolen car/car seat issue. We also gave her a bonus of two weeks pay last year, when we did not receive any bonuses ourselves (cue the nannies telling me what a crap bonus amount that is).
My DH is not a cheap bastard, or jerk, or whatever the hell else he was called on this thread. He grumbled a bit and was initially annoyed by the situation. He had no issue with me replacing the car seat after the first mention of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous[b wrote:]Your husband is a ____[/b]. Almost afraid to ask what this nanny's salary is, that he wants to make her pay for the theft. Just wow.
A MB here. Let me finish that sentence: Your husband is a cheap ba$tard. So it wasn't traumatic enough for your nanny that she had her car stolen and radio taken but your DH wants her to pay for the replacement of your kid's expensive (used) car seat? Are you going to remove it every night from her car so it doesn't happen again? Do you pay for her car insurance because it likely will go up if she files a claim for the car seat? Can she afford to live in a safer neighborhood on her nanny pay? I feel sorry for your children to have a father who is stingy and has so little compassion.
Well said. Thank God there are MB's out there like you who seem reasonable and have respect for your nannies. Shame on your husband OP for thinking it's your nannies responsibility to pay for a new car seat. I am totally disgusted.
Anonymous wrote:As an MB, I would replace the carseat. It isn't worth fighting over $300.
That said, I can see the husband's perspective. As between the employer and the nanny, the nanny is at fault here because the carseat was stolen from her custody. If you checked a bag at the airport and it got stolen from the luggage cart on the tarmac, no one would say "Oh, it's not the airline's fault; it's the fault of whomever stole the bag." No, you would consider the airline responsible because it had custody of the bag, despite the fact that the airline only took custody to benefit you. In other words, being at fault for the loss and being responsible for the loss are not exactly the same thing.
If nannies drive their charges in their own cars, they should get language in their contracts stating that they are not responsible for childrens' items, including carseats, that are damaged or stolen while in her car.