Anonymous wrote:I think OP is exaggerating here. First, she makes it sound like MB decided she pay her half her salary since that's all they could afford. Poor Cinderella! Then we come to find out they are paying her normal hourly rate at half the amount of hours. Then we find out that half time is what most people call a full work week anyway. (7 hours a day) so it's not as if she's not working a full day.
As far as not getting a good reference - I'm going to assume that was misinterpreted since OP seems to play the victim card a lot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think OP is exaggerating here. First, she makes it sound like MB decided she pay her half her salary since that's all they could afford. Poor Cinderella! Then we come to find out they are paying her normal hourly rate at half the amount of hours. Then we find out that half time is what most people call a full work week anyway. (7 hours a day) so it's not as if she's not working a full day.
As far as not getting a good reference - I'm going to assume that was misinterpreted since OP seems to play the victim card a lot.
Yes, we are definitely getting a one sided story. OP, make sure you present this very professionally in interviews and avoid badmouthing your current employer. Explain that your MB unfortunately lost her job, and does not need you for as many hours as you would like. Approach your current employer in a professional way, and explain that you cannot afford to continue working for them, but would like to help with the transition, assist with finding/training a replacement, etc.
Anonymous wrote:I think OP is exaggerating here. First, she makes it sound like MB decided she pay her half her salary since that's all they could afford. Poor Cinderella! Then we come to find out they are paying her normal hourly rate at half the amount of hours. Then we find out that half time is what most people call a full work week anyway. (7 hours a day) so it's not as if she's not working a full day.
As far as not getting a good reference - I'm going to assume that was misinterpreted since OP seems to play the victim card a lot.
Anonymous wrote:OP, you realize that if you seek a new job with fewer hours, you're unlikely to return to your weekly pay as it was before MB lost her job, right? What is the difference between what you are currently making and what you reasonably expect to make at a new job with the hours you are seeking?
Anonymous wrote:If OP was working 14 hrs a day and not paid OT, yes, fhe can sue.
Anonymous wrote:I think OP is exaggerating here. First, she makes it sound like MB decided she pay her half her salary since that's all they could afford. Poor Cinderella! Then we come to find out they are paying her normal hourly rate at half the amount of hours. Then we find out that half time is what most people call a full work week anyway. (7 hours a day) so it's not as if she's not working a full day.
As far as not getting a good reference - I'm going to assume that was misinterpreted since OP seems to play the victim card a lot.
Anonymous wrote:I think OP is exaggerating here. First, she makes it sound like MB decided she pay her half her salary since that's all they could afford. Poor Cinderella! Then we come to find out they are paying her normal hourly rate at half the amount of hours. Then we find out that half time is what most people call a full work week anyway. (7 hours a day) so it's not as if she's not working a full day.
As far as not getting a good reference - I'm going to assume that was misinterpreted since OP seems to play the victim card a lot.