Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Key is understanding your worth. "
Another key is actually being worth $17 for 1 baby.
Indeed. I can't imagine leaving my baby with a person who wasn't worth *at least* $17/hr. Apparently, each of us has different standards and goals.
I can't imagine leaving my baby with a person who wasn't worthy of being left with my baby. I found candidates at the $17 to $20 range who, regardless of experience, just weren't people I wanted helping to raise her. I also found candidates at the $15 price point who were worthy of the job and then some. There just isn't a consistent correlation between rates and quality in the nanny field.
If my child grows up to conduct herself like the nanny we hired at $15/hour, I will be very pleased. That's more than I can say about some $17-$20 nannies.
I can't imagine leaving my baby with a person who wasn't worthy of being left with my baby. I found candidates at the $17 to $20 range who, regardless of experience, just weren't people I wanted helping to raise her. I also found candidates at the $15 price point who were worthy of the job and then some. There just isn't a consistent correlation between rates and quality in the nanny field.
If my child grows up to conduct herself like the nanny we hired at $15/hour, I will be very pleased. That's more than I can say about some $17-$20 nannies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Key is understanding your worth. "
Another key is actually being worth $17 for 1 baby.
Indeed. I can't imagine leaving my baby with a person who wasn't worth *at least* $17/hr. Apparently, each of us has different standards and goals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I was looking to hire a nanny in 2012, I would have happily paid $20 per hour for someone who marketed herself as a private educator and was committed to teaching my child in an age-appropriate way per a written plan of her own design. I wanted it done through play, but with more pre-planned, adult-led activities than most nannies bother with, covering the full range of skill areas and, eventually, subject matter areas. There just aren't many candidates like that in DC.
I found that the women seeking premium rates were mostly young and deluded about current market rates. A few were older with years of experience, but they were unable to convince me that their 15-20 years of experience would make them better than the $15 nanny with 3-4 years of experience. In fact, some of the most experienced nannies seemed a tired of the work and just in it to pay bills, whereas the ones with 3-4 years experience were still really enamored of kids.
In my opinion, there are three things that will get a nanny to the $18-$20 starting price point: 1) working with a large family or in a share, 2) taking on cooking and housekeeping beyond the usual kid-related services, and 3) formal college-level training in education or child development, coupled with a willingness to translate that training in a planned way to home-based care.
I realize that some experienced nannies can start a new job with one child at that price point, but based on the pool of applicants I encountered, I just didn't feel like the value was there.
I find it quite interesting, that no where in your three points, do I see any skill that would directly benefit your child.
Anonymous wrote:"Key is understanding your worth. "
Another key is actually being worth $17 for 1 baby.
Anonymous wrote:I just interviewed in DC last week. 3 interviews (canceled my others). 2 nanny shares, one single family. All prepared to pay $16-20. Ended up taking the offer if the single family for about ~17 for one baby and occasional toddler and declined the share offers. Those jobs are out there. I have great references and interview well. I also make it clear at the start that I don't work off the book and never had a problem with people not wanting to pay my price.
What area are you looking in?
Anonymous wrote:When I was looking to hire a nanny in 2012, I would have happily paid $20 per hour for someone who marketed herself as a private educator and was committed to teaching my child in an age-appropriate way per a written plan of her own design. I wanted it done through play, but with more pre-planned, adult-led activities than most nannies bother with, covering the full range of skill areas and, eventually, subject matter areas. There just aren't many candidates like that in DC.
I found that the women seeking premium rates were mostly young and deluded about current market rates. A few were older with years of experience, but they were unable to convince me that their 15-20 years of experience would make them better than the $15 nanny with 3-4 years of experience. In fact, some of the most experienced nannies seemed a tired of the work and just in it to pay bills, whereas the ones with 3-4 years experience were still really enamored of kids.
In my opinion, there are three things that will get a nanny to the $18-$20 starting price point: 1) working with a large family or in a share, 2) taking on cooking and housekeeping beyond the usual kid-related services, and 3) formal college-level training in education or child development, coupled with a willingness to translate that training in a planned way to home-based care.
I realize that some experienced nannies can start a new job with one child at that price point, but based on the pool of applicants I encountered, I just didn't feel like the value was there.