Anonymous wrote:Let's see-how about because it is completely unethical to film someone without their knowledge? That good enough for you?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you don't trust who you're leaving your child with, shame on you. How can a mother take that kind of risk with her own child?? I just don't understand that kind of mentality.
I'm so tired of hearing this same thing, usually by women who choose to stay home with their children. If that is your choice I think that's great. But you have no right to judge what someone else does.
You obviously haven't read the previous posts all that well either. NO ONE has said they are choosing some random person off the street that they don't trust. Those of us using cameras are still doing all the background checks and leg work to make sure we are picking someone we think is trust worthy. But unless you have a magic crystal ball how does anyone know who they can trust completely? And how does it hurt in ANY way to have a little backup.
Even though this has been said a thousand times apparently some people aren't getting it. The point of the cameras is NOT because I don't trust my nannies to not abuse my kids. It's because I don't know them well enough to know if they are good with MY kids. They may have been great with someone else's kids but just don't click with mine. If the kids are too little to tell us how do we know? Most people are on their best behavior when their boss is around but who knows how they are when we aren't there.
I KNOW my kids were safe with every nanny we ever had but I'm not paying someone just to keep them safe. I want to know they are being well cared for and also having fun with someone who genuinely likes them and enjoys taking care of them.
I tell the nannies before they start working that we have cameras, I don't think it's fair to keep them a secret. I only really use them at the beginning to make sure they are good with my kids and then I stop looking at them. No nanny has ever had a problem with them and they usually tell me they've worked for lots of people with cameras before.
So now that you've read my post, give me one good reason why I shouldn't have cameras.
Let's see-how about because it is completely unethical to film someone without their knowledge? That good enough for you?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you don't trust who you're leaving your child with, shame on you. How can a mother take that kind of risk with her own child?? I just don't understand that kind of mentality.
I'm so tired of hearing this same thing, usually by women who choose to stay home with their children. If that is your choice I think that's great. But you have no right to judge what someone else does.
You obviously haven't read the previous posts all that well either. NO ONE has said they are choosing some random person off the street that they don't trust. Those of us using cameras are still doing all the background checks and leg work to make sure we are picking someone we think is trust worthy. But unless you have a magic crystal ball how does anyone know who they can trust completely? And how does it hurt in ANY way to have a little backup.
Even though this has been said a thousand times apparently some people aren't getting it. The point of the cameras is NOT because I don't trust my nannies to not abuse my kids. It's because I don't know them well enough to know if they are good with MY kids. They may have been great with someone else's kids but just don't click with mine. If the kids are too little to tell us how do we know? Most people are on their best behavior when their boss is around but who knows how they are when we aren't there.
I KNOW my kids were safe with every nanny we ever had but I'm not paying someone just to keep them safe. I want to know they are being well cared for and also having fun with someone who genuinely likes them and enjoys taking care of them.
I tell the nannies before they start working that we have cameras, I don't think it's fair to keep them a secret. I only really use them at the beginning to make sure they are good with my kids and then I stop looking at them. No nanny has ever had a problem with them and they usually tell me they've worked for lots of people with cameras before.
So now that you've read my post, give me one good reason why I shouldn't have cameras.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll quit on the spot if I find out my employers have one and didn't tell me about it. I'm not doing anything bad, but I don't want to be picking my nose on camera or anything. It's just respectful to be honest.
Don't worry - if I found out from my nanny cam that you were picking your nose, I'd fire you.
Hahahaha. Okay psycho.
I use a freaking tissue, come on people, but I still don't want to be doing that on camera! And yes, if I had a nanny myself I would also have a camera, but being upfront about it is the only right decision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you don't trust who you're leaving your child with, shame on you. How can a mother take that kind of risk with her own child?? I just don't understand that kind of mentality.
I'm so tired of hearing this same thing, usually by women who choose to stay home with their children. If that is your choice I think that's great. But you have no right to judge what someone else does.
You obviously haven't read the previous posts all that well either. NO ONE has said they are choosing some random person off the street that they don't trust. Those of us using cameras are still doing all the background checks and leg work to make sure we are picking someone we think is trust worthy. But unless you have a magic crystal ball how does anyone know who they can trust completely? And how does it hurt in ANY way to have a little backup.
Even though this has been said a thousand times apparently some people aren't getting it. The point of the cameras is NOT because I don't trust my nannies to not abuse my kids. It's because I don't know them well enough to know if they are good with MY kids. They may have been great with someone else's kids but just don't click with mine. If the kids are too little to tell us how do we know? Most people are on their best behavior when their boss is around but who knows how they are when we aren't there.
I KNOW my kids were safe with every nanny we ever had but I'm not paying someone just to keep them safe. I want to know they are being well cared for and also having fun with someone who genuinely likes them and enjoys taking care of them.
I tell the nannies before they start working that we have cameras, I don't think it's fair to keep them a secret. I only really use them at the beginning to make sure they are good with my kids and then I stop looking at them. No nanny has ever had a problem with them and they usually tell me they've worked for lots of people with cameras before.
So now that you've read my post, give me one good reason why I shouldn't have cameras.
How about the fact that you're so defensive over a comment made by an anonymous stranger, and it shows how deep down you're not truly comfortable with the real reason you use the cameras. I don't know what that reason is, but you do, and you aren't comfortable with it clearly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you don't trust who you're leaving your child with, shame on you. How can a mother take that kind of risk with her own child?? I just don't understand that kind of mentality.
I'm so tired of hearing this same thing, usually by women who choose to stay home with their children. If that is your choice I think that's great. But you have no right to judge what someone else does.
You obviously haven't read the previous posts all that well either. NO ONE has said they are choosing some random person off the street that they don't trust. Those of us using cameras are still doing all the background checks and leg work to make sure we are picking someone we think is trust worthy. But unless you have a magic crystal ball how does anyone know who they can trust completely? And how does it hurt in ANY way to have a little backup.
Even though this has been said a thousand times apparently some people aren't getting it. The point of the cameras is NOT because I don't trust my nannies to not abuse my kids. It's because I don't know them well enough to know if they are good with MY kids. They may have been great with someone else's kids but just don't click with mine. If the kids are too little to tell us how do we know? Most people are on their best behavior when their boss is around but who knows how they are when we aren't there.
I KNOW my kids were safe with every nanny we ever had but I'm not paying someone just to keep them safe. I want to know they are being well cared for and also having fun with someone who genuinely likes them and enjoys taking care of them.
I tell the nannies before they start working that we have cameras, I don't think it's fair to keep them a secret. I only really use them at the beginning to make sure they are good with my kids and then I stop looking at them. No nanny has ever had a problem with them and they usually tell me they've worked for lots of people with cameras before.
So now that you've read my post, give me one good reason why I shouldn't have cameras.
Anonymous wrote:If you don't trust who you're leaving your child with, shame on you. How can a mother take that kind of risk with her own child?? I just don't understand that kind of mentality.
Anonymous wrote:I'll quit on the spot if I find out my employers have one and didn't tell me about it. I'm not doing anything bad, but I don't want to be picking my nose on camera or anything. It's just respectful to be honest.
This is just stupid and shows that you are someone who wants to be told about nanny cams so you can make a point to get out of the house to be on your phone but would be just as happy to stay home watching TV, chatting on your phone or surfing the web if you knew there wasn't a camera. If you are able to refrain from picking your nose instead of using a kleenex when you know a camera is there, you should be able to refrain when a camera isn't there.
Anonymous wrote:We have nanny cams. Our nanny does not know. There's one in the kitchen (that overlooks the kitchen and great room where DD often plays), one in the playroom and one in DD's bedroom.
I think you can be diligent in checking all the references, listening to instincts, doing background checks, etc. but everyone who abuses, abuses someone for the first time at some point. And yes, if we find abuse on the camera then the damage has already been done, but at least the damage was only done once, instead of however many times before we figure it out without the help of a camera.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll quit on the spot if I find out my employers have one and didn't tell me about it. I'm not doing anything bad, but I don't want to be picking my nose on camera or anything. It's just respectful to be honest.
Don't worry - if I found out from my nanny cam that you were picking your nose, I'd fire you.
Anonymous wrote:I'll quit on the spot if I find out my employers have one and didn't tell me about it. I'm not doing anything bad, but I don't want to be picking my nose on camera or anything. It's just respectful to be honest.
This is just stupid and shows that you are someone who wants to be told about nanny cams so you can make a point to get out of the house to be on your phone but would be just as happy to stay home watching TV, chatting on your phone or surfing the web if you knew there wasn't a camera. If you are able to refrain from picking your nose instead of using a kleenex when you know a camera is there, you should be able to refrain when a camera isn't there.