No, just let the nanny pass out on your floor from her 12 hour starvation stint. Some of you are beyond hope.
Anonymous wrote:
I always pack a lunch and don't really care if the family has food for me or not. That being said, the bolded indicates a self-centered attitude that I try to avoid when choosing a family to work with. I put a lot of effort into caring for the children and families I work with, always trying to anticipate a need, being there when needed, etc. and I appreciate that effort to go both ways. If you can't be bothered to concern yourself with something so simple but kind, you are not someone I'd bust my hump for, hence I would not work with you.
What an odd response. The one with the self-centered attitude is you, if you expect to be fed on the job. My job doesn't provide me with free lunch and snacks, and I put in as much effort as you do to do good work. And I don't try to emotionally manipulate my employers by invoking some sort of silly association of providing meals to some sort of simple kindness. If you want to be respected as professionals, leave that talk at the door.
Plain and simple, meals are a perk. A very generous perk. If they are important to you, negotiate it. Or, you know, do what everyone else does and pack a lunch.
You need to work on your reading comprehension. My first sentence indicates that I do not in fact expect to be fed at work. However, for someone to say they can't be bothered to put a couple of things for the nanny on the grocery list, it shows they are self-centered and can't be bothered to think about the nanny beyond what she does for them. I don't want a boss like that. I do my best to be of help to my families in any way I can, and I'd appreciate a boss who respects me as another human being and cares enough not to relegate me to position of servant, not good enough to eat at their table and from their fridge. You can say I'm being dramatic, but I don't want to work for rude or selfish parents. It will only cross into other more important areas (raises, flexibility, expectations)
Anonymous wrote:The fact you can't leave the kids alone and go get take out or out to lunch on a real break i think families should provide food for at least lunch and snacks.
The family i work for will leave a note if they have extra left overs to eat them or i will eat what the kids do , mac and chesse , grilled chesse , easy things bc i don' get to leave the kids and go get lunch so i am glad they make sure the kitchen is stocked.
Anonymous wrote:I always pack a lunch and don't really care if the family has food for me or not. That being said, the bolded indicates a self-centered attitude that I try to avoid when choosing a family to work with. I put a lot of effort into caring for the children and families I work with, always trying to anticipate a need, being there when needed, etc. and I appreciate that effort to go both ways. If you can't be bothered to concern yourself with something so simple but kind, you are not someone I'd bust my hump for, hence I would not work with you.
What an odd response. The one with the self-centered attitude is you, if you expect to be fed on the job. My job doesn't provide me with free lunch and snacks, and I put in as much effort as you do to do good work. And I don't try to emotionally manipulate my employers by invoking some sort of silly association of providing meals to some sort of simple kindness. If you want to be respected as professionals, leave that talk at the door.
Plain and simple, meals are a perk. A very generous perk. If they are important to you, negotiate it. Or, you know, do what everyone else does and pack a lunch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Breakfast and dinner eaten at their own home?
Or do they have full access to all the food and drinks in your pantry within reason?
Just curious how most families handle it.
Most families ask the Nanny to do whatever she prefers.