Anonymous wrote:Is she responsible for his safety in any way, e.g
, If he runs in front of a car do you expect her to grab him? If so, she has responsibility for him and you pay her. If not, and you don't care if car hits him, then. No. You don't hsve to pay her.
Anonymous wrote:Is she responsible for his safety in any way, e.g
, If he runs in front of a car do you expect her to grab him? If so, she has responsibility for him and you pay her. If not, and you don't care if car hits him, then. No. You don't hsve to pay her.
Anonymous wrote:Is she responsible for his safety in any way, e.g
, If he runs in front of a car do you expect her to grab him? If so, she has responsibility for him and you pay her. If not, and you don't care if car hits him, then. No. You don't hsve to pay her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm glad it all worked out.
Well, to be honest, not really. At the end, it was a lot of drama and extra thinking and grasping for nothing of value. I should have just followed my original plan of full time preschool, nanny 100% for the baby, without going into all this hassle.
NP here. I agree. And, as a new reader of this post, I have to comment that I was shocked and appalled at the rude comments you got. There was a lot of judgement just bc you had the audacity to give your nanny a raise and then not want to pay her to care for two kids when she only would care for one.
There are a lot of decent nanny commenters on this board, but there are a number of nanny trolls, too. The nanny trolls on DCUM made me decide not to hire a nanny when I was looking into childcare six years ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm glad it all worked out.
Well, to be honest, not really. At the end, it was a lot of drama and extra thinking and grasping for nothing of value. I should have just followed my original plan of full time preschool, nanny 100% for the baby, without going into all this hassle.
Anonymous wrote:I'm glad it all worked out.
Anonymous wrote:OP here with an update. The nanny and I sat down to chat last Friday. I explained our plans in great detail, and said I understand her concern that she might get stuck with more work, and reassured her that we are committed to preventing any job creep, and that we expect her to care just for the infant.
What emerged was that the nanny feels understandably wistful to "release" the 4-year old from her care, and that she wanted to continue doing *something* for him. Because the additional raise wasn't really in the plans, and because we don't want to take advantage of her, we looked into some alternatives. We came up with something that works for both of us:
- once he starts preschool full-time, the nanny and the 4-year old will have up to two days a month they will spend together. This could be just random days to hang out at home, or sickness/whatever. Sort of "our special day" thing. So the annual allowance is 24 days.
- she will continue doing his laundry.
- in exchange, she will get two more weeks paid vacation time, one of her choosing, one of ours, bringing her total annual vacation time to four weeks paid.
This works for both us - allows her to spend some time with him, and get something in return. So it's all sorted out.
Anonymous wrote:NP here- I know that you were not looking for input on your childcare choices OP, but since that is the direction it took I wanted to share our experience. We had nannycare for our two children for many years (we had one single nanny for six years). When our then two and a half year old needed more stimulation, we put him in a very PT preschool (3 hours 3 times a week). We then had to transition to him being in full time preschool/daycare/preschool-with-aftercare and were super worried about it. But it was totally fine; he loves his school, happy to go everyday, etc. In many ways he is happier having more to share from his day, things he has learned, time with older kids, etc. Sounds like you know it already, but your child will be fine with this change!

Anonymous wrote:Of course we were - we are fabulous employers.
My son and his nanny do have contact, and would have retained some form of it. It HAS been tapering off as he started part-time schooling. You just disagree with regard to the speed at which it ought to taper off, and how much contact is sufficient.
It's silly to think that having nannycare equals importance in the eyes of a child. You might as well say that mommy is more important because she gets to go to work, or that older children are more important because they get to go to school. Or that he is more important because he gets to go to preschool and play with his friends! Every age comes with its own accoutrements.
I'm sure nannies love their charges, but it's a different kind of love, otherwise no nanny would have been able to move between families. It has a built-in expiration date, as I'm sure you know. At its heart it's a very special business relationship. Nannies move on too, and no love for her charge would stop the nanny from doing what's best for her, if that best involves moving to a better-paying job, or moving cities, or leaving nannying altogether. I recognize this, and would never tantrum, like some MBs would, when nannies chart their own to better things.