Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would counter with $30/hr.
....
....
Your nanny won't have a hard time finding a new family, but you may have a very difficult time replacing her, especially at $25/hour.
THIS.
+1.
No, you won't have a hard time replacing her at $25/hour. That is ridiculous
--former nanny, former nanny agency owner, and current nanny employer
You were (past tense); you were (past tense; and you currently have a vested interest in keeping the hourly rate low. You’re not to be taken seriously.
No one should get their responsibility and workload doubled with no added compensation. It’s just bad business.
Since this is a temporary situation, OP, I’d go with the monthly bonuses.