Anonymous wrote:Sure, but just like day care, nanny, or grandparents - they need to be seriously vetted.
We had our first AP join us when my oldest was two and youngest 4 months old. She was 100% fantastic, a very loving, doting and careful caregiver.
Our 2nd AP arrived a year later and I had our next baby 3 months in. She was with me during maternity leave and then took over when I went back to work. I hired a nanny's helper for a few hours a week but she was honestly fine without it. She did a great job taking care of the three.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, a hard no. We had au pair for our just-turned-2 year old and it was a mistake. The kids need to be able to talk and tell you things that might be red flags. As our youngest got older (she’s now 4) the AP situation got much much better (granted it was a different AP). I just think most of these girls aren’t trained in the reality of meeting a non verbal baby’s needs. It’s hard! My own parents got much better with me kids when they were able to communicate their needs.
Talking is not necessarily helpful. Our 5yr old (almost 6) has entered the age of making up stories and lying about stuff.
If you eliminate every problematic age, then there's no good time ever for an AP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, a hard no. We had au pair for our just-turned-2 year old and it was a mistake. The kids need to be able to talk and tell you things that might be red flags. As our youngest got older (she’s now 4) the AP situation got much much better (granted it was a different AP). I just think most of these girls aren’t trained in the reality of meeting a non verbal baby’s needs. It’s hard! My own parents got much better with me kids when they were able to communicate their needs.
Talking is not necessarily helpful. Our 5yr old (almost 6) has entered the age of making up stories and lying about stuff.
If you eliminate every problematic age, then there's no good time ever for an AP.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, a hard no. We had au pair for our just-turned-2 year old and it was a mistake. The kids need to be able to talk and tell you things that might be red flags. As our youngest got older (she’s now 4) the AP situation got much much better (granted it was a different AP). I just think most of these girls aren’t trained in the reality of meeting a non verbal baby’s needs. It’s hard! My own parents got much better with me kids when they were able to communicate their needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nope nope nope. I first learned about APs when we moved into our home.next door to a CCAP LCC. The rematch rate across the board was 35% with the bulk of those rematches with young children. The stories I heard made my blood curdle. One infant had such awful diaper rash she got a staph infection. Not a chance.
We were very lucky to have our LCC be a neighbor and good friend or else after seeing the revolving door of INSANE drama in would have never entered with any child into the program.
So you’re anti au pairs in general, got it.
An au pair could not have caused a staff infection, get a clue.
Anonymous wrote:Nope nope nope. I first learned about APs when we moved into our home.next door to a CCAP LCC. The rematch rate across the board was 35% with the bulk of those rematches with young children. The stories I heard made my blood curdle. One infant had such awful diaper rash she got a staph infection. Not a chance.
We were very lucky to have our LCC be a neighbor and good friend or else after seeing the revolving door of INSANE drama in would have never entered with any child into the program.