Anonymous wrote:Our daughter who just turned 3 is in daycare that costs $16k annually and we have a new baby. I don't feel like we can afford to switch to a nanny but DH is really pushing for it cuz he is tired of our toddler being sick literally every other week from daycare and also coming home exhausted physically and emotionally every day. We both work FT and make $200k combined and I'm estimating that a FT nanny will cost something like $50k a year including taxes and insurance? plus we'll have to find a little preschool program that could be another $5k a year. So I suppose we can technically afford it but I just feel like it's a lot. he really thinks it would be worth it tho. Help me think it through...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who would do new baby care if don't look for a nanny?
My mom offered to come over every day and take care of the baby for a year or two. She did that for my daughter until we sent her to daycare at 2. But she only does the minimum -- feeding napping crayons and playground -- it's ok in a pinch. She won't do library or play groups or actively engaged with child's toys. She's got a very set way about child care.
Perfect. This is all you need and it saves money. The "minimum" is what a baby needs- not playgroups and toys.
For centuries that's all babies had and it is fine.
My Grandma was my babysitter until Kindergarten, and I went to top 20 schools and am now an Executive. All tots need is love and the basics.
I do not agree. A baby needs stimulation and engagement to maximize brain development. The bare minimum isn’t close to enough.
Stimulation is going for a walk outside, watching the world go by.
Stimulation is watching parent or Grandma cook and do dishes and normal household chores.
Stimulation is playing with normal household items- pots, pans, spoons.
You don't need to complicate it to have a baby/toddler learn and develop
A baby would be better off in daycare than this nothing existence.
So are SAHMs worthless? Is being home with a loving relative who also needs to do all the housework and organization a terrible thing for a baby? That's ridiculous
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who would do new baby care if don't look for a nanny?
My mom offered to come over every day and take care of the baby for a year or two. She did that for my daughter until we sent her to daycare at 2. But she only does the minimum -- feeding napping crayons and playground -- it's ok in a pinch. She won't do library or play groups or actively engaged with child's toys. She's got a very set way about child care.
Perfect. This is all you need and it saves money. The "minimum" is what a baby needs- not playgroups and toys.
For centuries that's all babies had and it is fine.
My Grandma was my babysitter until Kindergarten, and I went to top 20 schools and am now an Executive. All tots need is love and the basics.
I do not agree. A baby needs stimulation and engagement to maximize brain development. The bare minimum isn’t close to enough.
Stimulation is going for a walk outside, watching the world go by.
Stimulation is watching parent or Grandma cook and do dishes and normal household chores.
Stimulation is playing with normal household items- pots, pans, spoons.
You don't need to complicate it to have a baby/toddler learn and develop
A baby would be better off in daycare than this nothing existence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who would do new baby care if don't look for a nanny?
My mom offered to come over every day and take care of the baby for a year or two. She did that for my daughter until we sent her to daycare at 2. But she only does the minimum -- feeding napping crayons and playground -- it's ok in a pinch. She won't do library or play groups or actively engaged with child's toys. She's got a very set way about child care.
Perfect. This is all you need and it saves money. The "minimum" is what a baby needs- not playgroups and toys.
For centuries that's all babies had and it is fine.
My Grandma was my babysitter until Kindergarten, and I went to top 20 schools and am now an Executive. All tots need is love and the basics.
I do not agree. A baby needs stimulation and engagement to maximize brain development. The bare minimum isn’t close to enough.
Stimulation is going for a walk outside, watching the world go by.
Stimulation is watching parent or Grandma cook and do dishes and normal household chores.
Stimulation is playing with normal household items- pots, pans, spoons.
You don't need to complicate it to have a baby/toddler learn and develop