Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m op. I think we will consider a part time nanny. This might mean cutting down her 10 hour days to maybe 7-4. I don’t really find it effective to be paying for availability when we don’t always need it. If we hire another nanny at least we know she won’t get mad for having to stay late. We usually stay late 1-2 days per week and most of the time it is last minute. We cannot just go home because our nanny cannot stay late. I understand everyone has a life so it might be better to have someone else in the evenings
You are going to have to pay a part time nanny guaranteed for those extra hours anyway. And the part time, after-school nanny is the hardest to find and keep.
But if you cannot guarantee your full time nanny until seven (but you are going to guarantee a part time nanny until 7?) that is all you can do. Your nanny is not wrong to get frustrated and tired of never knowing if she is going to be home for dinner or not.
And millions of women rush home ONLY because their nanny cannot stay late!
We will guarantee hours for the part time nanny.
I’m not the quoted pp, I’m just confused. What is the difference between giving your current nanny guaranteed hours every day until 7, and giving an new nanny the same? You are paying for those hours, regardless. If your current nanny would be interested, you should just stick with her for the whole day. She may not be, but you should ask. It would only make things simpler for you.
I’m op. I really don’t want to have this issue with my nanny again where we are paying her until 7 and she’s not available. What if we pay her and she says she can’t stay? She already works 10 or more hours so I rather have someone who isn’t burnt out.
She's not available because you are not paying her to BE available. Once you pay her to be available up to 7, she will be free to plan for after that and not feel resentful (which I can assure you is part of the problem). Part of the reason she may be burnt out is because of the unpredictability of the late schedule.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m op. I think we will consider a part time nanny. This might mean cutting down her 10 hour days to maybe 7-4. I don’t really find it effective to be paying for availability when we don’t always need it. If we hire another nanny at least we know she won’t get mad for having to stay late. We usually stay late 1-2 days per week and most of the time it is last minute. We cannot just go home because our nanny cannot stay late. I understand everyone has a life so it might be better to have someone else in the evenings
You are going to have to pay a part time nanny guaranteed for those extra hours anyway. And the part time, after-school nanny is the hardest to find and keep.
But if you cannot guarantee your full time nanny until seven (but you are going to guarantee a part time nanny until 7?) that is all you can do. Your nanny is not wrong to get frustrated and tired of never knowing if she is going to be home for dinner or not.
And millions of women rush home ONLY because their nanny cannot stay late!
We will guarantee hours for the part time nanny.
I’m not the quoted pp, I’m just confused. What is the difference between giving your current nanny guaranteed hours every day until 7, and giving an new nanny the same? You are paying for those hours, regardless. If your current nanny would be interested, you should just stick with her for the whole day. She may not be, but you should ask. It would only make things simpler for you.
I’m op. I really don’t want to have this issue with my nanny again where we are paying her until 7 and she’s not available. What if we pay her and she says she can’t stay? She already works 10 or more hours so I rather have someone who isn’t burnt out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m op. I think we will consider a part time nanny. This might mean cutting down her 10 hour days to maybe 7-4. I don’t really find it effective to be paying for availability when we don’t always need it. If we hire another nanny at least we know she won’t get mad for having to stay late. We usually stay late 1-2 days per week and most of the time it is last minute. We cannot just go home because our nanny cannot stay late. I understand everyone has a life so it might be better to have someone else in the evenings
You are going to have to pay a part time nanny guaranteed for those extra hours anyway. And the part time, after-school nanny is the hardest to find and keep.
But if you cannot guarantee your full time nanny until seven (but you are going to guarantee a part time nanny until 7?) that is all you can do. Your nanny is not wrong to get frustrated and tired of never knowing if she is going to be home for dinner or not.
And millions of women rush home ONLY because their nanny cannot stay late!
We will guarantee hours for the part time nanny.
I’m not the quoted pp, I’m just confused. What is the difference between giving your current nanny guaranteed hours every day until 7, and giving an new nanny the same? You are paying for those hours, regardless. If your current nanny would be interested, you should just stick with her for the whole day. She may not be, but you should ask. It would only make things simpler for you.
I’m op. I really don’t want to have this issue with my nanny again where we are paying her until 7 and she’s not available. What if we pay her and she says she can’t stay? She already works 10 or more hours so I rather have someone who isn’t burnt out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m op. I think we will consider a part time nanny. This might mean cutting down her 10 hour days to maybe 7-4. I don’t really find it effective to be paying for availability when we don’t always need it. If we hire another nanny at least we know she won’t get mad for having to stay late. We usually stay late 1-2 days per week and most of the time it is last minute. We cannot just go home because our nanny cannot stay late. I understand everyone has a life so it might be better to have someone else in the evenings
You are going to have to pay a part time nanny guaranteed for those extra hours anyway. And the part time, after-school nanny is the hardest to find and keep.
But if you cannot guarantee your full time nanny until seven (but you are going to guarantee a part time nanny until 7?) that is all you can do. Your nanny is not wrong to get frustrated and tired of never knowing if she is going to be home for dinner or not.
And millions of women rush home ONLY because their nanny cannot stay late!
We will guarantee hours for the part time nanny.
I’m not the quoted pp, I’m just confused. What is the difference between giving your current nanny guaranteed hours every day until 7, and giving an new nanny the same? You are paying for those hours, regardless. If your current nanny would be interested, you should just stick with her for the whole day. She may not be, but you should ask. It would only make things simpler for you.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe you or your husband should choose your children over your job.
Anonymous wrote:You ask her to be flexible until 7pm but she's not paid until that time so there's no way she HAS to be available for you any time you ask.
I'd pay her these extra hours every day if she agrees.
Use that extra time for work when you have to and to relax when you don't. Everybody will be happy.
She has a life, you have to respect that, she can't be at your beck and call.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m op. I think we will consider a part time nanny. This might mean cutting down her 10 hour days to maybe 7-4. I don’t really find it effective to be paying for availability when we don’t always need it. If we hire another nanny at least we know she won’t get mad for having to stay late. We usually stay late 1-2 days per week and most of the time it is last minute. We cannot just go home because our nanny cannot stay late. I understand everyone has a life so it might be better to have someone else in the evenings
You are going to have to pay a part time nanny guaranteed for those extra hours anyway. And the part time, after-school nanny is the hardest to find and keep.
But if you cannot guarantee your full time nanny until seven (but you are going to guarantee a part time nanny until 7?) that is all you can do. Your nanny is not wrong to get frustrated and tired of never knowing if she is going to be home for dinner or not.
And millions of women rush home ONLY because their nanny cannot stay late!
We will guarantee hours for the part time nanny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m op. I think we will consider a part time nanny. This might mean cutting down her 10 hour days to maybe 7-4. I don’t really find it effective to be paying for availability when we don’t always need it. If we hire another nanny at least we know she won’t get mad for having to stay late. We usually stay late 1-2 days per week and most of the time it is last minute. We cannot just go home because our nanny cannot stay late. I understand everyone has a life so it might be better to have someone else in the evenings
You are going to have to pay a part time nanny guaranteed for those extra hours anyway. And the part time, after-school nanny is the hardest to find and keep.
But if you cannot guarantee your full time nanny until seven (but you are going to guarantee a part time nanny until 7?) that is all you can do. Your nanny is not wrong to get frustrated and tired of never knowing if she is going to be home for dinner or not.
And millions of women rush home ONLY because their nanny cannot stay late!
We will guarantee hours for the part time nanny.
Anonymous wrote:I’m op. I think we will consider a part time nanny. This might mean cutting down her 10 hour days to maybe 7-4. I don’t really find it effective to be paying for availability when we don’t always need it. If we hire another nanny at least we know she won’t get mad for having to stay late. We usually stay late 1-2 days per week and most of the time it is last minute. We cannot just go home because our nanny cannot stay late. I understand everyone has a life so it might be better to have someone else in the evenings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m op. I think we will consider a part time nanny. This might mean cutting down her 10 hour days to maybe 7-4. I don’t really find it effective to be paying for availability when we don’t always need it. If we hire another nanny at least we know she won’t get mad for having to stay late. We usually stay late 1-2 days per week and most of the time it is last minute. We cannot just go home because our nanny cannot stay late. I understand everyone has a life so it might be better to have someone else in the evenings
You are going to have to pay a part time nanny guaranteed for those extra hours anyway. And the part time, after-school nanny is the hardest to find and keep.
But if you cannot guarantee your full time nanny until seven (but you are going to guarantee a part time nanny until 7?) that is all you can do. Your nanny is not wrong to get frustrated and tired of never knowing if she is going to be home for dinner or not.
And millions of women rush home ONLY because their nanny cannot stay late!
Anonymous wrote:I’m op. I think we will consider a part time nanny. This might mean cutting down her 10 hour days to maybe 7-4. I don’t really find it effective to be paying for availability when we don’t always need it. If we hire another nanny at least we know she won’t get mad for having to stay late. We usually stay late 1-2 days per week and most of the time it is last minute. We cannot just go home because our nanny cannot stay late. I understand everyone has a life so it might be better to have someone else in the evenings