Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would never accept or offer a position that didn’t come with benefits. This thread is about a weekly rate for 40 hours per week with no additional expenses. I NEVER said nanny wouldn’t have benefits. I said that the “parents” wouldn’t have any additional expenses.
Most nannies that I know who only work 40 hours a week make around $600-750 per week before taxes and that’s why they shoot for jobs that can offer overtime. If they’re in a share obviously they make more. So this goes back to why I asked if parents would pay a “slightly higher rate” if they had no additional expenses.
Honestly, I have never know a nanny to make that little.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would never accept or offer a position that didn’t come with benefits. This thread is about a weekly rate for 40 hours per week with no additional expenses. I NEVER said nanny wouldn’t have benefits. I said that the “parents” wouldn’t have any additional expenses.
Most nannies that I know who only work 40 hours a week make around $600-750 per week before taxes and that’s why they shoot for jobs that can offer overtime. If they’re in a share obviously they make more. So this goes back to why I asked if parents would pay a “slightly higher rate” if they had no additional expenses.
Honestly, I have never know a nanny to make that little.
Anonymous wrote:I would never accept or offer a position that didn’t come with benefits. This thread is about a weekly rate for 40 hours per week with no additional expenses. I NEVER said nanny wouldn’t have benefits. I said that the “parents” wouldn’t have any additional expenses.
Most nannies that I know who only work 40 hours a week make around $600-750 per week before taxes and that’s why they shoot for jobs that can offer overtime. If they’re in a share obviously they make more. So this goes back to why I asked if parents would pay a “slightly higher rate” if they had no additional expenses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question is confusing. You say, "would you pay ..."
Do you mean is that what it costs? Or do you mean if a nanny asked for that much would someone be willing to pay it?
Sorry, since I put “hello parents” in the subject I didn’t put parents again... Would parents pay anywhere between $725-900 per week for a nanny?
Our nanny grossed over $1050 a week but also has full healthcare and vacation and sick days.
Does she work OT?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question is confusing. You say, "would you pay ..."
Do you mean is that what it costs? Or do you mean if a nanny asked for that much would someone be willing to pay it?
Sorry, since I put “hello parents” in the subject I didn’t put parents again... Would parents pay anywhere between $725-900 per week for a nanny?
Our nanny grossed over $1050 a week but also has full healthcare and vacation and sick days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question is confusing. You say, "would you pay ..."
Do you mean is that what it costs? Or do you mean if a nanny asked for that much would someone be willing to pay it?
Sorry, since I put “hello parents” in the subject I didn’t put parents again... Would parents pay anywhere between $725-900 per week for a nanny?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question is confusing. You say, "would you pay ..."
Do you mean is that what it costs? Or do you mean if a nanny asked for that much would someone be willing to pay it?
Sorry, since I put “hello parents” in the subject I didn’t put parents again... Would parents pay anywhere between $725-900 per week for a nanny?
Anonymous wrote:The question is confusing. You say, "would you pay ..."
Do you mean is that what it costs? Or do you mean if a nanny asked for that much would someone be willing to pay it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you pay anywhere between $725- 900 per week (40 hours) for a nanny in the DMV area? No additional fees such as employer taxes, healthcare, groceries, payroll service, vacation, sick time etc.?
I would not.