Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What type of background do these cheap parents have -- do they give insights into what types of professions they have? Is this cheapness common in the DC area?
It seems common based on all the lowball offers on care.com. And the funny thing is, these people don’t think they are cheap.
Anonymous wrote:Just had a family tell me they will pay $150-1$75 per week because " well the baby sleeps most of the day". The baby is 2 months old.
Anonymous wrote:What type of background do these cheap parents have -- do they give insights into what types of professions they have? Is this cheapness common in the DC area?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many parents still don't understand the importance of engaging a newborn when awake. Babies don't sleep as much during the day as most parents believe unless the poor baby is bored.
Babies don't sleep because they are bored. Newborns sleep a lot, but then they grow and stay awake more. And i doubt that parents like this will raise the rate when the baby is more alert--they're just cheap. WHich is why they are trying to pay $3-5/hour for child care.
Op here. Try $2 per hour. They need 10 hours per day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many parents still don't understand the importance of engaging a newborn when awake. Babies don't sleep as much during the day as most parents believe unless the poor baby is bored.
Babies don't sleep because they are bored. Newborns sleep a lot, but then they grow and stay awake more. And i doubt that parents like this will raise the rate when the baby is more alert--they're just cheap. WHich is why they are trying to pay $3-5/hour for child care.