Anonymous wrote:
My lesson learned. You'll never find it. Lower your expectations.
If there was a person who was capable of everything you said, they'd have other better career opportunities. Jobs that paid more, gave more flexibility, more RESPECT from others.
Nannies are usually nannies because their job options are something along the lines of .... taking care of babies, working at a call center, selling Avon to friends or whatever else they have these days, or target/Walmart. Of those options, those who have strong personalities (can't be told what to do) usually pick the nanny profession because there is no other grownup watching their back.
You could write a sociology paper on this topic. Anyway... conclusion, you'll never find what you are looking for. The good news is that kids turn out great even if you don't have those things and can't find that nanny. So don't despair.
Even the Elementary School Teacher... she could wax poetry about how much she likes working with kids one on one. Call me jaded after all these years but... if she became a fully qualified Elementary School Teacher.. which takes years of training, then it must've been hard to change the status quo, make a life changing decision to go into another career field. What could that be? There was something major to make her forgo all of that training and throw away all the investment of her years working as an Elementary School Teacher. Why did the nanny profession look so good to her at that point? She couldn't take the politics at the school? Couldn't stay organized? Couldn't handle the kids? It was something that she was not cut out for. I wish her the best and everyone deserves a fair wage but honestly, putting your expectations on anyone, even a former Elementary School Teacher seems unfair.
Anonymous wrote:Where are you located, OP?
I am a former elementary school teacher and have been nannying full-time for 6.5 years now. I have considered starting my own agency and staffing only nannies with the qualifications you’re seeking. Unfortunately, I think employers like you are few and far between. Too many people want the easy (cheap) way out.
Anonymous wrote:
My lesson learned. You'll never find it. Lower your expectations.
If there was a person who was capable of everything you said, they'd have other better career opportunities. Jobs that paid more, gave more flexibility, more RESPECT from others.
Nannies are usually nannies because their job options are something along the lines of .... taking care of babies, working at a call center, selling Avon to friends or whatever else they have these days, or target/Walmart. Of those options, those who have strong personalities (can't be told what to do) usually pick the nanny profession because there is no other grownup watching their back.
You could write a sociology paper on this topic. Anyway... conclusion, you'll never find what you are looking for. The good news is that kids turn out great even if you don't have those things and can't find that nanny. So don't despair.
Even the Elementary School Teacher... she could wax poetry about how much she likes working with kids one on one. Call me jaded after all these years but... if she became a fully qualified Elementary School Teacher.. which takes years of training, then it must've been hard to change the status quo, make a life changing decision to go into another career field. What could that be? There was something major to make her forgo all of that training and throw away all the investment of her years working as an Elementary School Teacher. Why did the nanny profession look so good to her at that point? She couldn't take the politics at the school? Couldn't stay organized? Couldn't handle the kids? It was something that she was not cut out for. I wish her the best and everyone deserves a fair wage but honestly, putting your expectations on anyone, even a former Elementary School Teacher seems unfair.
Anonymous wrote:I have three children all of whom revceived academic scholarships to top tier colleges. Two are now in Phi Beta Kappa. I was a SAHM and too damn busy to read to them, so horsehockey!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reading an hour a day to a newborn... ok...
NP here and I hope to God you are not a nanny.
Yes, we read to our newborn for over an hour a day - generally in fifteen minute increments. Now an very verbal two-year-old, she loves books and can recognize any of the 200 books in her bookshelf and recite the title. Reading from birth is one of the most important things a parent or caregiver can do for their child. Google it. The research is plentiful.
I'm a parent of a child who read at 3.5 and still reads hours a day. Reading to your newborn an hour a day is very bizzare.
NP here. No, it is actually recommended. The more language a newborn hears - the better. Just look it up.
And adult droning on reading from a book is not the kind of language and newborn needs. A newborn primarily needs language that is responsive and interactive. They are not learning words at this age, they are learning through the social connection of the call and response with their caregiver and they are learning the phonemes and adult droning on reading from a book is not the kind of language and newborn needs. A newborn primarily needs language that is responsive and interactive. They are not learning words at this age, they are learning through the social connection of the call and response with their caregiver and they are learning the phonemes which make up the specific language they are hearing, which are best learned not through Shakespeare, but through the universal way of talking to Babies, which researchers sometimes call “mother-ese“ and which is usually derided as baby talk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No advice, just a comment:. You are crazy!
No, OP is not crazy. This is the future, PP. Now that we know how important the first three years of life are in shaping the intelligence of a child, the future is the educated, teacher nanny. As more parents are desirous and willing to pay for the college graduate in Early Childhood Development or Education, the more young women will move into the field and become nannies.
You expect all of this for $20/hr? Ha!
Who said anything about $20 an hour?! OP here and we expect to pay on the $28 to $30 range.
Friends have a brilliant nanny who has a masters degree and a former career as a teacher and writer. She is 58, amazing health and energy, and became a nanny four years prior to being hired by my friend. We want someone like her. She is paid $28 an hour now (started at $27 two years ago) and my friends pay her healthcare insurance. Another friend has a good nanny, a recent college graduate in Early Childhood Education, who has nannied prior to her college education. She is in her 20's and is paid $28 an hour to start. She isn't as good as the first nanny I mentioned but still good.
Both were found on care.com but after long, exhaustive searches. Both not only placed carefully worded ads but also searched profiles to find these nannies. I was hoping not to have to go thru that but will if need be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reading an hour a day to a newborn... ok...
NP here and I hope to God you are not a nanny.
Yes, we read to our newborn for over an hour a day - generally in fifteen minute increments. Now an very verbal two-year-old, she loves books and can recognize any of the 200 books in her bookshelf and recite the title. Reading from birth is one of the most important things a parent or caregiver can do for their child. Google it. The research is plentiful.
I'm a parent of a child who read at 3.5 and still reads hours a day. Reading to your newborn an hour a day is very bizzare.
NP here. No, it is actually recommended. The more language a newborn hears - the better. Just look it up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reading an hour a day to a newborn... ok...
NP here and I hope to God you are not a nanny.
Yes, we read to our newborn for over an hour a day - generally in fifteen minute increments. Now an very verbal two-year-old, she loves books and can recognize any of the 200 books in her bookshelf and recite the title. Reading from birth is one of the most important things a parent or caregiver can do for their child. Google it. The research is plentiful.
I'm a parent of a child who read at 3.5 and still reads hours a day. Reading to your newborn an hour a day is very bizzare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reading an hour a day to a newborn... ok...
NP here and I hope to God you are not a nanny.
Yes, we read to our newborn for over an hour a day - generally in fifteen minute increments. Now an very verbal two-year-old, she loves books and can recognize any of the 200 books in her bookshelf and recite the title. Reading from birth is one of the most important things a parent or caregiver can do for their child. Google it. The research is plentiful.