Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never 3!! How fricking cruel to put your nanny in the position to deny a little kid food!
The drama! No kid is going to die if s/he doesn’t get a snack. Heck, a kid won’t even go hungry if s/he misses a snack. Stop being so dramatic, please!
NP here and do you want to be the caregiver dealing with a crying toddler who doesn't understand why the other kid gets to eat but he doesn't? Have you ever been around very little kids?
Did you read the OP? Telling the nanny the snacks were off-limits was suggested as a means to get nanny to tell other family to provide snacks. If one kid doesn’t have snacks, the host family kid could go without snacks (which is what I would do as the nanny - not feed one in front of the other. But that didn’t occur to you, did it?).
I also have young kids. Yes, they sometimes get upset if they don’t get what they want, but our job as adults is to teach them that they don’t always get their way. At least, that’s what I’m doing with my children.
Some children need snacks, Einstein. A healthy snack between breakfast and lunch and another between lunch and dinner is the healthiest way to eat for a growing child. The hose child should not have to go without a healthy snack if he/she needs it.
Do you really let your poor children cry when they are hungry? I feel so sorry for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is this such a thing? Just let the other mom know that her kid has started wanting snacks during the day and ask her to send whatever snacks she wants her kid to eat along with her regular food. An additional concern other than the cost is that the other mom may not want her kid snacking at all or having the snacks the nanny is giving her but is completely unaware her kid is getting this food.
+1. Really, I think it’s the nanny’s responsibility to let the parents know the kids are snacking and ask them to provide food (otherwise, without OP happening to be home, how would either parent ever know?). But, since nanny isn’t following through, just talk to the other mom and ask her to provide snacks. No, it isn’t your responsibility to finance the snacks. But the adults could agree to alternate weeks/keep a tab to ensure that the kids are eating the same thing, if you so desire.
). I then told the mom the she really likes Cheerios and always taking B’s, so the mom went out and bought a big box for both A and B to share.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never 3!! How fricking cruel to put your nanny in the position to deny a little kid food!
The drama! No kid is going to die if s/he doesn’t get a snack. Heck, a kid won’t even go hungry if s/he misses a snack. Stop being so dramatic, please!
NP here and do you want to be the caregiver dealing with a crying toddler who doesn't understand why the other kid gets to eat but he doesn't? Have you ever been around very little kids?
Did you read the OP? Telling the nanny the snacks were off-limits was suggested as a means to get nanny to tell other family to provide snacks. If one kid doesn’t have snacks, the host family kid could go without snacks (which is what I would do as the nanny - not feed one in front of the other. But that didn’t occur to you, did it?).
I also have young kids. Yes, they sometimes get upset if they don’t get what they want, but our job as adults is to teach them that they don’t always get their way. At least, that’s what I’m doing with my children.