Anonymous wrote:Of course it's supposed to be one of your biggest costs it's care for your kids. If you don't want to spend for top quality child care than stay home and raise them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, basically the nanny salary would be one of your incomes. It might make sense if you are in a career field you can easily go back to, to take a few years off and go back. Or, suck it up short term to keep your job and career. Its probably common that a large portion of one salary go to child care.
No, it would be half of my net income - or his, we make the same. So 25% of our household net income. That might not have been clear in my original post. Otherwise, yes, we definitely would be considering having one of us stay at home. DH wants nothing more than to be a stay at home dad, actually. Someday.![]()
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Appreciate the feedback. Comforting to know others are in similar situations. It's just difficult to swallow that we won't be saving much, if anything, over the couple of years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DB was complaining about a month ago on how "all of his money goes to me, his sons nanny." Turns out he was right- to a degree. He invests 50% of his check and after he pays me he has $200 a week left. He told me this and then asked if I would work 24/7 but only get paid for 45hrs a week.
Your post makes no sense as who pays the mortgage and other bills.