Anonymous wrote:I'm a bit worried about this situation--our AP wants to babysit in her free weekend time. I'm not comfortable with this bc I don't think it is permitted. I honestly do not think it is to make $$ but I think more to pass the time. I told her I think she should be out making friends and traveling on the weekend but she says she has 2 weeks for travel at the end of her year and that should be enough.
I am concerned bc if the agency finds out she could get in trouble and that could impact us and also bc of liability of what if something happens, how does that get explained (plus our car being tied into transport for her to do this...which I am not ok with either.)
I want her to be happy but i don't think this is the way.
Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:APs want/need money. If they offer to babysit for money and you're comfortable with it, that's a win for everyone.
Wanting and needing money are different things. I've never matched with an AP who said she is coming to the States because she needs money. THey know their living expenses are covered-they come for the cultural exchange, and if they are smart with their money and budget for travel, they have a fantastic year, even without violating the terms of their visa. If they are here to spend more money than the stipend covers, then their decision to become an AP was a mistake. The terms of their visa, the program, the stipend, etc, are laid out very clearly before they sign the contract. If I accepted a job offer, with conditions and salary laid out as clearly as it is for AP, and signed the contract, then I have no excuse to complain about salary/stipend if I live beyond my means.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is a violation of the state dept regulations for AP to work on a J-1 Visa. It is not the HFs violation. However, it is a contract violation if the HF permits it. So, if you really don’t know about it, you aren’t breaking the law. But if you allow/condone it, you are violating your agency contract.
We are with CCAP. The LCC always come visit within the 1st or 2nd week to meet both the host parents and AP together. We have had several LCC over the years and they run down a check list of things to cover during the meeting - including mention that it is a violation of the visa for the AP to earn money doing other work. So, in theory, every host family and AP have been given notice about this and there should ne no pleading ignorance on this.
Anonymous wrote:When I was an au pair the stipend was $100 a week.
Anonymous wrote:APs want/need money. If they offer to babysit for money and you're comfortable with it, that's a win for everyone.
Anonymous wrote:It is a violation of the state dept regulations for AP to work on a J-1 Visa. It is not the HFs violation. However, it is a contract violation if the HF permits it. So, if you really don’t know about it, you aren’t breaking the law. But if you allow/condone it, you are violating your agency contract.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The hypocrisy of the responses in this thread is mind-boggling. My LCC has shared stories of babysitting complication drama. If you condone or even encourage your AP to break the terms of her visa, how do you explain your expectation that AP won't break your household rules, or the laws of this country? If your relationship with your AP is such that she is "part of the family", what message are you sending to your own children? Break the terms of a contract you signed, as long as there is financial gain, and as long as you, the host parent, isn't inconvenienced by it. No wonder Trump is in office.
It's no wonder Hilary is not.
Anonymous wrote:We have a section in the handbook about how working other jobs, including babysitting and part-time work is a violation of the visa. We know some families give AP right of first refusal for babysitting their own kids. We don't. We hire a babysitter for hours over 45 and do not offer the gig to the AP first. We do not want to muddy the waters and get into the circumstance of which rule violation we would look the other way and which we would enforce.
Anonymous wrote:The hypocrisy of the responses in this thread is mind-boggling. My LCC has shared stories of babysitting complication drama. If you condone or even encourage your AP to break the terms of her visa, how do you explain your expectation that AP won't break your household rules, or the laws of this country? If your relationship with your AP is such that she is "part of the family", what message are you sending to your own children? Break the terms of a contract you signed, as long as there is financial gain, and as long as you, the host parent, isn't inconvenienced by it. No wonder Trump is in office.