Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know nannies in this area who get $25/hour for one child. Can't imagine a nanny who'll do well with OP's boatload of a workload, unless she's super nanny AND a saint. Good luck with that.
OP here - Yeah, I'm getting the vibe that this won't work out well. I don't find handling them all to be much harder than just handling the twins alone, given that the older one helps with the little one, and the little one is just a cute little blob. Of course, I'm the mother.
Yes, but I have also found that adding additional children doesn't add that much per hour.
For example, I had one child and for babysitting the going rate was $20/hour. But friends who had 2 kids - same rate. Friends with 3 kids - $22/$23 an hour.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know nannies in this area who get $25/hour for one child. Can't imagine a nanny who'll do well with OP's boatload of a workload, unless she's super nanny AND a saint. Good luck with that.
OP here - Yeah, I'm getting the vibe that this won't work out well. I don't find handling them all to be much harder than just handling the twins alone, given that the older one helps with the little one, and the little one is just a cute little blob. Of course, I'm the mother.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know nannies in this area who get $25/hour for one child. Can't imagine a nanny who'll do well with OP's boatload of a workload, unless she's super nanny AND a saint. Good luck with that.
OP here - Yeah, I'm getting the vibe that this won't work out well. I don't find handling them all to be much harder than just handling the twins alone, given that the older one helps with the little one, and the little one is just a cute little blob. Of course, I'm the mother.
My nanny handles my four, and they were approximately the ages of OP's kids when she started.
What I did to make it a more reasonable job was hire a second person. I call her a "mother's helper," but she is actually a grown-up and more of a part-time housekeeper who will also do whatever, including some child care. She overlaps with the full time nanny. She comes 7-12 every day, and helps me get kids ready for school. I take the oldest (who is now 6) to school, and she stays with the others until our regular nanny arrives at 8:30. When the baby (now almost two) was very young, she watched him in the morning (he was often napping) while the nanny drove #2 to preschool and did activities with #3. She also does all the laundry, dinner prep, some errands, and just general cleaning up around the house as time permits. We have a cleaning service for deep cleaning.
These days, all three younger kids nap/do quiet time for an hour in the afternoon. Then they go get big brother at school, then they either play at home, go somewhere, or do an activity planned by the nanny. While it is more kids to manage, they also play together really well. It's like a built-in daily play date.
With OP's needs, I might consider finding an afternoon part time person to help with the late afternoons. If you find the right person, you can cut back on your nanny's overtime, and keep her from burning out. The total payroll might not be less, but your second person can maybe help make your life easier in other ways.
Not OP, but I'm curious how much this costs per year if you don't mind sharing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know nannies in this area who get $25/hour for one child. Can't imagine a nanny who'll do well with OP's boatload of a workload, unless she's super nanny AND a saint. Good luck with that.
OP here - Yeah, I'm getting the vibe that this won't work out well. I don't find handling them all to be much harder than just handling the twins alone, given that the older one helps with the little one, and the little one is just a cute little blob. Of course, I'm the mother.
My nanny handles my four, and they were approximately the ages of OP's kids when she started.
What I did to make it a more reasonable job was hire a second person. I call her a "mother's helper," but she is actually a grown-up and more of a part-time housekeeper who will also do whatever, including some child care. She overlaps with the full time nanny. She comes 7-12 every day, and helps me get kids ready for school. I take the oldest (who is now 6) to school, and she stays with the others until our regular nanny arrives at 8:30. When the baby (now almost two) was very young, she watched him in the morning (he was often napping) while the nanny drove #2 to preschool and did activities with #3. She also does all the laundry, dinner prep, some errands, and just general cleaning up around the house as time permits. We have a cleaning service for deep cleaning.
These days, all three younger kids nap/do quiet time for an hour in the afternoon. Then they go get big brother at school, then they either play at home, go somewhere, or do an activity planned by the nanny. While it is more kids to manage, they also play together really well. It's like a built-in daily play date.
With OP's needs, I might consider finding an afternoon part time person to help with the late afternoons. If you find the right person, you can cut back on your nanny's overtime, and keep her from burning out. The total payroll might not be less, but your second person can maybe help make your life easier in other ways.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think you'd pay $20-26 an hour plus OT after 40 hours, and possible health insurance (or a portion) plus two weeks leave (their choice). You'd also probably need to provide a car with car seats as most cars cannot hold 4 kids plus car seats in/out. You'd also need workers comp.
This is where I get confused about the all-in annual amount. Let's assume $25/hour for 40 hours and $30/hour for the other 10 = $1300/week or ~$68,000. How much would be the health care on top of that? Also, isn't $75K out of pocket high for this area?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know nannies in this area who get $25/hour for one child. Can't imagine a nanny who'll do well with OP's boatload of a workload, unless she's super nanny AND a saint. Good luck with that.
OP here - Yeah, I'm getting the vibe that this won't work out well. I don't find handling them all to be much harder than just handling the twins alone, given that the older one helps with the little one, and the little one is just a cute little blob. Of course, I'm the mother.
Anonymous wrote:I know nannies in this area who get $25/hour for one child. Can't imagine a nanny who'll do well with OP's boatload of a workload, unless she's super nanny AND a saint. Good luck with that.
Anonymous wrote:Let's estimate $25 per hour base. That is high for this area, but not high for four young kids for this area.
$25*40 = $1,000
$25*1.5*10= $375
Weekly total for 50 hours = $1,375
Let's estimate 10% additional on top for taxes.
$1,375 + 0.1*1,375 = $1,512.50
You will generally pay this amount for all 52 weeks per year. So annual amount:
$1,512.5*52 = $78,650
So, the total cost for your nanny will likely be around $79k. Most nannies get two weeks of paid vacation. Often the nanny gets to choose her weeks, so you may need to factor in additional money for backup care then if you do not plan to schedule your own vacations around the nanny's vacations. Some employers offer a health insurance stipend of $100-$200 per month, but that is not super common.
If you are not in a very walkable area, then you will also need to provide a car. In that case, you need to factor in the extra cost of insuring your nanny. That can depend on a ton of factors, but I would maybe ballpark an extra $100 per month.
And, as a previous poster noted, it would be best for your twins if they all get out of the house every day. Over summer, they can go to the park and many free activities, but you may want to factor in some money for activities in the colder months. Whether you consider that a nanny cost is up to you.