Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a shame.
Most parents in DC area want the special care but very cheap about it.
They make good money, complain that this area is expnsive as if their nannies commute to their place from Texas or something. Hello? We live in this expensive area too.
DC area parents would pay $100s on massages, haircuts but want a nanny they can slave. No nanny should expect a job that pays less than $20 per hour per child.
And parents, remmeber. A nanny is not a house keeper. A nanny is there to take care, love, nurture and keep your child safe not clean up after your mess.
$20 per hour per child? You've got to be kidding me. I know it's just a handful of nannies on this site, but they sure work hard at inflating the rate.
Bet you pay your dog walker more per hour. How about your mancure or pedicures? A nanny takes care of your precious child. If it was easy YOU would be doing it
No, I don't. I don't pay $20 per hour per anything. So if I have 3 kids, I'm supposed to pay a nanny $60 per hour? I know all the nannies would say yes, by that's just ridiculous. I may as well quit my job. At least I would get to spend time with my kids if I did.
And I don't have a dog walker, I don't get my nails done, and I don't go to Starbucks. We're not all wealthy people to exploit.
Bet you are not a math major.
I think the poster meant to say one child per hour should start at $20 and if you have 2 children a reasonable adjustment can be made. Us nannies in the area are just saying that most parents here think paying a nanny $12-$15 is okay. Well, it is not.
If you are not able to afford it then do not get a nanny. There are daycares for families like you. You want a person's full time attention for your child then you must pay for it. Same thing goes for public schools vs private schools or even tutors. When you want your dhild to learn how to play the guitar group rates and private lessons do not cost the same right? So why can you parents not understand hiring a nanny is the same?
i think your u are feeling entitled to a nanny only because you went to college and are somewhat better than 'the help' if you cannot afford a nanny check out daycares.
Wow. Those are a lot of nasty assumptions just because I said I didn't want to be exploited. For the record, we don't have a nanny. We thought about it and can afford to pay well above market. But then we read the many nasty posts like yours and get really turned off. We have no room for all the drama.
We've had sitters who didn't go to college, but were the nicest, most caring people you'd ever meet. I don't care if you, PP, went to college, have a masters, or a doctorate. I would still want nothing to do with you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a shame.
Most parents in DC area want the special care but very cheap about it.
They make good money, complain that this area is expnsive as if their nannies commute to their place from Texas or something. Hello? We live in this expensive area too.
DC area parents would pay $100s on massages, haircuts but want a nanny they can slave. No nanny should expect a job that pays less than $20 per hour per child.
And parents, remmeber. A nanny is not a house keeper. A nanny is there to take care, love, nurture and keep your child safe not clean up after your mess.
$20 per hour per child? You've got to be kidding me. I know it's just a handful of nannies on this site, but they sure work hard at inflating the rate.
Bet you pay your dog walker more per hour. How about your mancure or pedicures? A nanny takes care of your precious child. If it was easy YOU would be doing it
No, I don't. I don't pay $20 per hour per anything. So if I have 3 kids, I'm supposed to pay a nanny $60 per hour? I know all the nannies would say yes, by that's just ridiculous. I may as well quit my job. At least I would get to spend time with my kids if I did.
And I don't have a dog walker, I don't get my nails done, and I don't go to Starbucks. We're not all wealthy people to exploit.
Bet you are not a math major.
I think the poster meant to say one child per hour should start at $20 and if you have 2 children a reasonable adjustment can be made. Us nannies in the area are just saying that most parents here think paying a nanny $12-$15 is okay. Well, it is not.
If you are not able to afford it then do not get a nanny. There are daycares for families like you. You want a person's full time attention for your child then you must pay for it. Same thing goes for public schools vs private schools or even tutors. When you want your dhild to learn how to play the guitar group rates and private lessons do not cost the same right? So why can you parents not understand hiring a nanny is the same?
i think your u are feeling entitled to a nanny only because you went to college and are somewhat better than 'the help' if you cannot afford a nanny check out daycares.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a shame.
Most parents in DC area want the special care but very cheap about it.
They make good money, complain that this area is expnsive as if their nannies commute to their place from Texas or something. Hello? We live in this expensive area too.
DC area parents would pay $100s on massages, haircuts but want a nanny they can slave. No nanny should expect a job that pays less than $20 per hour per child.
And parents, remmeber. A nanny is not a house keeper. A nanny is there to take care, love, nurture and keep your child safe not clean up after your mess.
$20 per hour per child? You've got to be kidding me. I know it's just a handful of nannies on this site, but they sure work hard at inflating the rate.
Bet you pay your dog walker more per hour. How about your mancure or pedicures? A nanny takes care of your precious child. If it was easy YOU would be doing it
No, I don't. I don't pay $20 per hour per anything. So if I have 3 kids, I'm supposed to pay a nanny $60 per hour? I know all the nannies would say yes, by that's just ridiculous. I may as well quit my job. At least I would get to spend time with my kids if I did.
And I don't have a dog walker, I don't get my nails done, and I don't go to Starbucks. We're not all wealthy people to exploit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a shame.
Most parents in DC area want the special care but very cheap about it.
They make good money, complain that this area is expnsive as if their nannies commute to their place from Texas or something. Hello? We live in this expensive area too.
DC area parents would pay $100s on massages, haircuts but want a nanny they can slave. No nanny should expect a job that pays less than $20 per hour per child.
And parents, remmeber. A nanny is not a house keeper. A nanny is there to take care, love, nurture and keep your child safe not clean up after your mess.
$20 per hour per child? You've got to be kidding me. I know it's just a handful of nannies on this site, but they sure work hard at inflating the rate.
Bet you pay your dog walker more per hour. How about your mancure or pedicures? A nanny takes care of your precious child. If it was easy YOU would be doing it
No, I don't. I don't pay $20 per hour per anything. So if I have 3 kids, I'm supposed to pay a nanny $60 per hour? I know all the nannies would say yes, by that's just ridiculous. I may as well quit my job. At least I would get to spend time with my kids if I did.
And I don't have a dog walker, I don't get my nails done, and I don't go to Starbucks. We're not all wealthy people to exploit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a shame.
Most parents in DC area want the special care but very cheap about it.
They make good money, complain that this area is expnsive as if their nannies commute to their place from Texas or something. Hello? We live in this expensive area too.
DC area parents would pay $100s on massages, haircuts but want a nanny they can slave. No nanny should expect a job that pays less than $20 per hour per child.
And parents, remmeber. A nanny is not a house keeper. A nanny is there to take care, love, nurture and keep your child safe not clean up after your mess.
$20 per hour per child? You've got to be kidding me. I know it's just a handful of nannies on this site, but they sure work hard at inflating the rate.
Bet you pay your dog walker more per hour. How about your mancure or pedicures? A nanny takes care of your precious child. If it was easy YOU would be doing it
No, I don't. I don't pay $20 per hour per anything. So if I have 3 kids, I'm supposed to pay a nanny $60 per hour? I know all the nannies would say yes, by that's just ridiculous. I may as well quit my job. At least I would get to spend time with my kids if I did.
And I don't have a dog walker, I don't get my nails done, and I don't go to Starbucks. We're not all wealthy people to exploit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a shame.
Most parents in DC area want the special care but very cheap about it.
They make good money, complain that this area is expnsive as if their nannies commute to their place from Texas or something. Hello? We live in this expensive area too.
DC area parents would pay $100s on massages, haircuts but want a nanny they can slave. No nanny should expect a job that pays less than $20 per hour per child.
And parents, remmeber. A nanny is not a house keeper. A nanny is there to take care, love, nurture and keep your child safe not clean up after your mess.
$20 per hour per child? You've got to be kidding me. I know it's just a handful of nannies on this site, but they sure work hard at inflating the rate.
Bet you pay your dog walker more per hour. How about your mancure or pedicures? A nanny takes care of your precious child. If it was easy YOU would be doing it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a shame.
Most parents in DC area want the special care but very cheap about it.
They make good money, complain that this area is expnsive as if their nannies commute to their place from Texas or something. Hello? We live in this expensive area too.
DC area parents would pay $100s on massages, haircuts but want a nanny they can slave. No nanny should expect a job that pays less than $20 per hour per child.
And parents, remmeber. A nanny is not a house keeper. A nanny is there to take care, love, nurture and keep your child safe not clean up after your mess.
$20 per hour per child? You've got to be kidding me. I know it's just a handful of nannies on this site, but they sure work hard at inflating the rate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Found this gem:
Looking for a full time live-in nanny and housekeeper to cook, DEEP clean and keep our home VERY tidy and organized, feed and care for our two dogs and care for our 2 3-year-olds and our 4-year-old from morning until 5:45 p.m. and also get our 6-year-old on the bus at 8 a.m. and off the bus in front of our home at 4:00 p.m. and provide care for her as well. Free room and board plus $400. 00 cash per week, text me to set up an interview.
How in the world is a housekeeper supposed to keep a house VERY tidy, do DEEP cleaning, and still have the time. energy and patience to wrangle 1 6 year old, 1 4 year old and 3 year old twins? I frequently do extra chores when kids are asleep, but I'm not scrubbing showers or doing anything else that can't be left when kids get up!
And for all of that, $400 cash...
Well, let's look at this.
$400 cash per week is $20,800 per year before taxes. Since the family will not report taxes (illegal, btw), that's about the equivalent of $27,000 salary.
Full board can run $100 per week (bc shopping for one is more expensive than shopping for many), so another $5,200.
Room can run $1,000 per month, depending on location and set up. So another $12,000.
Adding up all pretax benefits (20,800 + 5,200 + 12,000) equals $38,000 pretax.
That is actually about $50,000 before taxes.
Assuming the nanny works 50 hours a week with a 2 week vacation 1 week sick leave and 2 weeks holiday, that makes $20.83 per hour, before taxes.
That's not even accounting for utilities (gas, electricity, water, sewer, cable, Internet, etc.). For example, adding $200 in utilities per month would drive the pretax hourly rate up to about $22.06 per hour.
But in order to do those chores, we're probably looking at 60 hours a week, instead of 50. So that would make an hourly pretax rate of $18.40.
Anyway, the real loser in this deal is the IRS. But the nanny also loses because no one would pay into her social security, Medicare, and unemployment benefits.
Nannies, unless you're illegal, please don't accept cash. It may seem like a lot more now, but think about your retirement. Social Security pays out over decades. Is that extra $200 per week worth decades in lower social securely payments?
Anonymous wrote:Found this gem:
Looking for a full time live-in nanny and housekeeper to cook, DEEP clean and keep our home VERY tidy and organized, feed and care for our two dogs and care for our 2 3-year-olds and our 4-year-old from morning until 5:45 p.m. and also get our 6-year-old on the bus at 8 a.m. and off the bus in front of our home at 4:00 p.m. and provide care for her as well. Free room and board plus $400. 00 cash per week, text me to set up an interview.
How in the world is a housekeeper supposed to keep a house VERY tidy, do DEEP cleaning, and still have the time. energy and patience to wrangle 1 6 year old, 1 4 year old and 3 year old twins? I frequently do extra chores when kids are asleep, but I'm not scrubbing showers or doing anything else that can't be left when kids get up!
And for all of that, $400 cash...
Anonymous wrote:What a shame.
Most parents in DC area want the special care but very cheap about it.
They make good money, complain that this area is expnsive as if their nannies commute to their place from Texas or something. Hello? We live in this expensive area too.
DC area parents would pay $100s on massages, haircuts but want a nanny they can slave. No nanny should expect a job that pays less than $20 per hour per child.
And parents, remmeber. A nanny is not a house keeper. A nanny is there to take care, love, nurture and keep your child safe not clean up after your mess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a lot of work to do with three kids in the house. I think it would be okay-ish (though I personally wouldn't apply for this since the only deep cleaning I want to do is my own, and even then want is a strong word!) if the nanny had free hours in the mornings when the kids were at preschool or something like this, but a bunch of little kids only plays nicely together for so long, so all these chores would take ages to do while the nanny has to go settle all their disputes and needs for water, etc.
PP here, I didn't even notice the two dogs as well! Three kids at all times, two dogs, all cooking, deep cleaning and keeping the whole house tidy? I don't see this as doable without having to plop the kids in front of the TV.
Have you ever been a mother?
No. Your point?
My point is that it was obvious you were not a mother, as mothers do this all the time. Manage a house and kids, clean up, educate and guide them. Nothing in this job description is that hard and $1600 plus free housing sounds like a great deal.