Anonymous wrote:lol op please shut up. These people are so gullible for responding with serious replies. Why would police work with an employer of an occasional babysitter in an instance like this just because she didn't show for a job? You would have to be a relative and have waited 24 hours.
Anonymous wrote:My father is a cop and yes phones are reachable but it violates the law and is an invasion of privacy so unless someone is in grave danger like a hostage situation of missing for an extended period of time, they will not do a trace. They will see if the phone is on and if it's being picked up on different towers to indicate the phone is moving as OP said an officer told her that. You don't need to be a relative to report someone missing. OP did the right thing. It's not the movies people you can't just track a phone and go to the person after a day of being "missing".
Anonymous wrote:They were trying to identify her and had him look at drivers license pictures of women with her name. A no call no show is one thing. She told me what she wanted for dinner, told me she was on her way, then tells me she is is having car troubles and would be here soon and didn't show up. I was worried she is on the side of the road alone and maybe something happened. I am starting to think that maybe she did just not show up and is fine. I didn't realize or think anyone would do this.
Anonymous wrote:Was she paid in cash?