Anonymous wrote:I recently started working with a new family. The contract states that nanny will take her vacations when the family is out of town, at least 3 weeks out of the year (one in summer, one in winter, one in the fall or spring), and will provide at least 8 weeks notice of vacation dates. Nanny also has three paid personal days off per year, other time requested off beyond that will be unpaid.
I emailed them asking if they had their vacation dates for the summer yet, and they emailed me the dates, three days (Wed-Fri) in late July, plus one Friday in late June, and another Friday in late August. MB said they had chosen to do 3 long weekends instead of one whole week. I said I was confused because I thought I was guaranteed one full week over the summer, and I was planning to visit my parents who live on the other side of the country so Wed- Sunday really doesn't work for me. They said they are still giving me 5 days off in the summer and I can still take more time off if I want but it would be unpaid.
What say you DCUM?
Anonymous wrote:MB here-
No, it is not in keeping with the contract. The contract says 3 weeks. A week is Sunday-Saturday. Therefore, it should be 3 Sunday-Saturday periods off.
If they wanted to work in days, they should have said 15 PTO days- that's what they do in companies, so people can split vacation days as needed.
You are entitled to your summer vacation "week" paid per contract.
(Be aware however, if you go this route, she may never allow you to split your vacation week into days. you may have to take a day here or there unpaid)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Extremely shitty, but technically in keeping with the contract (not that that really matters). Because it's technically in keeping with the contract, I could see if there was just genuinely not a meeting of the minds (i.e., this is what they meant all along)... but then, the way she said "we decided to..." clearly implies it isn't what they had in mind initially/what they were thinking when the contract was signed. So, probably, they meant the contract as you'd interpret it common sense-wise (i.e., week at a time), changed their mind, re-read the contract and realized that they could probably get away with it.
If I were you and I otherwise liked the family, I'd explain that that's genuinely not what you understood, that you'll make it work this time, but you want to discuss the understanding going forward b/c with your family on the other side of the country, you wouldn't have signed the contract if you realized all three of the "weeks" could be like this.
The other 2 weeks are full week, how many times does OP really need to travel to see her family?
Also how does OP afford to travel to the other side of the country so much on a nanny salary?
Anonymous wrote:OP, why can't you visit your family Wednesday through Sunday? I don't get it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, why can't you visit your family Wednesday through Sunday? I don't get it.
NP - OP could visit her family for just Wednesday through Sunday, but if she had taken with job in the anticipation of being able to spend 9 days with her family (Sat to following Sun) when her NF took their vacation and is now told that for the same cost ticket to fly to visit she can only go for 5 days (55% of the time) then she may correctly feel that the offer of a week's vacation in the summer was basically a bait and switch.
I'm a MB and this is shitty.
Anonymous wrote:OP, why can't you visit your family Wednesday through Sunday? I don't get it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Extremely shitty, but technically in keeping with the contract (not that that really matters). Because it's technically in keeping with the contract, I could see if there was just genuinely not a meeting of the minds (i.e., this is what they meant all along)... but then, the way she said "we decided to..." clearly implies it isn't what they had in mind initially/what they were thinking when the contract was signed. So, probably, they meant the contract as you'd interpret it common sense-wise (i.e., week at a time), changed their mind, re-read the contract and realized that they could probably get away with it.
If I were you and I otherwise liked the family, I'd explain that that's genuinely not what you understood, that you'll make it work this time, but you want to discuss the understanding going forward b/c with your family on the other side of the country, you wouldn't have signed the contract if you realized all three of the "weeks" could be like this.
The other 2 weeks are full week, how many times does OP really need to travel to see her family?
Also how does OP afford to travel to the other side of the country so much on a nanny salary?
How much do you spend on average for trips?
Anonymous wrote:Ps, forgot to add use those days to interview and quit!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Extremely shitty, but technically in keeping with the contract (not that that really matters). Because it's technically in keeping with the contract, I could see if there was just genuinely not a meeting of the minds (i.e., this is what they meant all along)... but then, the way she said "we decided to..." clearly implies it isn't what they had in mind initially/what they were thinking when the contract was signed. So, probably, they meant the contract as you'd interpret it common sense-wise (i.e., week at a time), changed their mind, re-read the contract and realized that they could probably get away with it.
If I were you and I otherwise liked the family, I'd explain that that's genuinely not what you understood, that you'll make it work this time, but you want to discuss the understanding going forward b/c with your family on the other side of the country, you wouldn't have signed the contract if you realized all three of the "weeks" could be like this.
The other 2 weeks are full week, how many times does OP really need to travel to see her family?
Also how does OP afford to travel to the other side of the country so much on a nanny salary?