Anonymous wrote:For so many years nanny agencies have had control over a nannies future, we needed you to get employed. I just love when agencies say they want candidates to impress them, make them like you. Agencies are losing awesome candidates with their superior attitude and making it about them. The good news for nannies is they do not have to grovel at the agencies feet and they do not have to feel less of a person because that agency did not make them the favorite.

Thank you to online for growing and giving nannies the chance to meet the employers and impressing them as they are the ones that hire us. Nannies you are no longer the product sold. Yes there are some good agencies but remember we are the ones that get the job so you can make a sale.

Nannies what are some of your negative experiences with agencies?

Anonymous wrote:OMG, I am loving this thread. Thank you, OP!

Anonymous wrote:OP here

Ok, looks like some are trying to go into a different direction, if you want to comment on the use of grammar and such would you start your own thread on that? Sometimes even nannies can be so mean to each other, nannies, NCS, nanny tutors and even babysitters fit into the childcare category. It is awesome that many nannies have expanded and have become a specialist nanny but there are awesome babysitters that have expanded with experience and have every right to call themselves a nanny.

The point of this thread is for nannies to give their opinion on agencies, some have great experiences but many have been abused and put down upon by agencies. If it is OK with the grammar patrol can you give these nannies a place to feel safe to express themselves and keep your grading to yourself please.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here

Was looking to give nannies a chance to express their thoughts concerning agencies on a safe platform. Not so much looking to write an article slamming agencies but perhaps give them a wake-up call. So often I see agencies slamming online nanny services then turn around and put up a job they have. If agencies are resorting to filling their positions using online I ask why, [b]sense they always advertise how they have a large pool of quality nannies.[/b] Agencies also like to boast that they weed out 80% or more of applicants but I wonder if the 10% nannies they are looking for do not want anything to do with them. IMO agencies with a superior attitude are their own worse enemy and will continue to loose out on great nannies, they have no one to blame but themselves. (I would bold this whole "sentence" really) Nannies do not pay the agency so they are not their customer but if they have no nannies in their pool then they will not make a sale.

Nannies have found that they can find their own jobs and do not have a need for agencies thanks to online services and employers can get great nannies and not pay the outrageous agency fees.

So nannies and employers have a win-win and agencies can continue to blame online for taking away their business.

Well said. Right now agencies are doing nothing to attract the best nannies, so they have to settle for mediocre nannies and parents are not impressed. Agencies can kiss their outrageous fees good-bye until they start doing some real work.

?? Truly?? So now to be one of the "best nannies" one needs to merely declare it? I should hope someone claiming to be one of the best in a field that includes teaching children and helping with homework to at least have a grasp of grammar, spelling and math...

+ 1,000,000

Unbelievable the number of *expert* nannies here who can't even form a proper sentence.

Oh NO ! it is the grammar police


Believe it or not, you can be a great caring nanny and not be the best in grammar or spelling and better yet nannies that are not grammar snobs

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here

Was looking to give nannies a chance to express their thoughts concerning agencies on a safe platform. Not so much looking to write an article slamming agencies but perhaps give them a wake-up call. So often I see agencies slamming online nanny services then turn around and put up a job they have. If agencies are resorting to filling their positions using online I ask why, [b]sense they always advertise how they have a large pool of quality nannies.[/b] Agencies also like to boast that they weed out 80% or more of applicants but I wonder if the 10% nannies they are looking for do not want anything to do with them. IMO agencies with a superior attitude are their own worse enemy and will continue to loose out on great nannies, they have no one to blame but themselves. (I would bold this whole "sentence" really) Nannies do not pay the agency so they are not their customer but if they have no nannies in their pool then they will not make a sale.

Nannies have found that they can find their own jobs and do not have a need for agencies thanks to online services and employers can get great nannies and not pay the outrageous agency fees.

So nannies and employers have a win-win and agencies can continue to blame online for taking away their business.

Well said. Right now agencies are doing nothing to attract the best nannies, so they have to settle for mediocre nannies and parents are not impressed. Agencies can kiss their outrageous fees good-bye until they start doing some real work.

?? Truly?? So now to be one of the "best nannies" one needs to merely declare it? I should hope someone claiming to be one of the best in a field that includes teaching children and helping with homework to at least have a grasp of grammar, spelling and math...

+ 1,000,000

Unbelievable the number of *expert* nannies here who can't even form a proper sentence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here

Was looking to give nannies a chance to express their thoughts concerning agencies on a safe platform. Not so much looking to write an article slamming agencies but perhaps give them a wake-up call. So often I see agencies slamming online nanny services then turn around and put up a job they have. If agencies are resorting to filling their positions using online I ask why, [b]sense they always advertise how they have a large pool of quality nannies.[/b] Agencies also like to boast that they weed out 80% or more of applicants but I wonder if the 10% nannies they are looking for do not want anything to do with them. IMO agencies with a superior attitude are their own worse enemy and will continue to loose out on great nannies, they have no one to blame but themselves. (I would bold this whole "sentence" really) Nannies do not pay the agency so they are not their customer but if they have no nannies in their pool then they will not make a sale.

Nannies have found that they can find their own jobs and do not have a need for agencies thanks to online services and employers can get great nannies and not pay the outrageous agency fees.

So nannies and employers have a win-win and agencies can continue to blame online for taking away their business.

Well said. Right now agencies are doing nothing to attract the best nannies, so they have to settle for mediocre nannies and parents are not impressed. Agencies can kiss their outrageous fees good-bye until they start doing some real work.

?? Truly?? So now to be one of the "best nannies" one needs to merely declare it? I should hope someone claiming to be one of the best in a field that includes teaching children and helping with homework to at least have a grasp of grammar, spelling and math...