Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our first nanny (for our newborn twins) was 58 when we hired her and she was with us for three years.
She was fantastic and her experience and maturity made her invaluable in all kinds of ways.
Then, as our kids became preschoolers, they became much more difficult for her - they were too heavy for her to lift easily, she has growing arthritis challenges, they were too fast for her to keep up with which made her nervous about taking them out, etc...
So we switched nannies. We now have a very young nanny. Her energy and enthusiasm is fantastic (and exceeds ours!), but I also miss the maturity and experience of our first nanny. Our current nanny would be overwhelmed by the demands of twin newborns.
Both women were terrific fits for our needs at the time.
So a great deal depends on the people in question, the ages/needs of the kids, and the overall fit of family and nanny.
This was one reason I stuck with younger women. It's not fair, but I would have felt awful about letting an older woman go because I needed a younger model, especially if I was going to have to recommend her to the next family. I had once had an older housekeeper, and it was a similar story; I am not in a position to provide a pension to someone who can't work (particularly someone I've only know for a couple of years, not a lifelong family employee), but I also found it difficult to let her go knowing she lived paycheck to paycheck. I didn't want that to happen again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our first nanny (for our newborn twins) was 58 when we hired her and she was with us for three years.
She was fantastic and her experience and maturity made her invaluable in all kinds of ways.
Then, as our kids became preschoolers, they became much more difficult for her - they were too heavy for her to lift easily, she has growing arthritis challenges, they were too fast for her to keep up with which made her nervous about taking them out, etc...
So we switched nannies. We now have a very young nanny. Her energy and enthusiasm is fantastic (and exceeds ours!), but I also miss the maturity and experience of our first nanny. Our current nanny would be overwhelmed by the demands of twin newborns.
Both women were terrific fits for our needs at the time.
So a great deal depends on the people in question, the ages/needs of the kids, and the overall fit of family and nanny.
This was one reason I stuck with younger women. It's not fair, but I would have felt awful about letting an older woman go because I needed a younger model, especially if I was going to have to recommend her to the next family. I had once had an older housekeeper, and it was a similar story; I am not in a position to provide a pension to someone who can't work (particularly someone I've only know for a couple of years, not a lifelong family employee), but I also found it difficult to let her go knowing she lived paycheck to paycheck. I didn't want that to happen again.
Anonymous wrote:Our first nanny (for our newborn twins) was 58 when we hired her and she was with us for three years.
She was fantastic and her experience and maturity made her invaluable in all kinds of ways.
Then, as our kids became preschoolers, they became much more difficult for her - they were too heavy for her to lift easily, she has growing arthritis challenges, they were too fast for her to keep up with which made her nervous about taking them out, etc...
So we switched nannies. We now have a very young nanny. Her energy and enthusiasm is fantastic (and exceeds ours!), but I also miss the maturity and experience of our first nanny. Our current nanny would be overwhelmed by the demands of twin newborns.
Both women were terrific fits for our needs at the time.
So a great deal depends on the people in question, the ages/needs of the kids, and the overall fit of family and nanny.
Anonymous wrote:I am very overweight which I think turns some parents off hiring me. However, The families I have worked for have loved how much I take their kids out to do things. Walks every day, playgrounds, bike riding etc. I don't enjoy playing soccer or running around but I do make sure the kids have plenty of activity.
That was true for talcum powder but they don't sell that anymore. They've changed the formulation to cornstarch which is just fine.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Id hire you for my newborn come June! If you are a good fit for our family otherwise. I have no qualms about older nannies as long as there's a personality match and you're not coming off as condescending.
I can however imagine in this Information Age that some moms feel like they know everything or have plans on how to handle everything and don't want an older adult to deal with.
I'm a MB and don't understand your last sentence. When you're the boss, you dictate how you want things done. When you hire an employee with experience, they can (and should) give suggestions based on past experience or education, but ultimately the boss decides what they want done, when they want it done, and how. My MIL thought there was nothing wrong with using baby powder because she used it in the 80's. She's very "spry" for her age and will go rock climbing and stuff with us, but she has old info.
What IS the harm in baby powder?
It's horrible for your lungs and it causes cancer.
Anonymous wrote:It may be fear of more experience = higher rates
or
it could be fear that with all your experience, you'll be set in your ways and be like many of the condescending nannies on here who think their bosses are idiots and don't know what's best for their children - that experience trumps evidence or personal preference etc.
It's not fair that people assume that, but knowing that might be some of the areas of concern, you can put people at ease letting them know that you really respect parental wishes and that you're upfront about your expectations.