Anonymous wrote:"nannydebsays wrote:
Know a nanny who interviewed with parents of infant twins, and was <GASP!> honest about being a newlywed and hoping to have a baby at some point. The employers hired her on the condition that she delay trying until the infant twins were 18 months old. She did, and is still with them today, 5+ years down the road.
She even <HORRORS!> brings her child to work with her, and has since her child was 6 weeks old. And she didn't have her pay cut and has gotten RAISES in the last years of being a nanny/mom.
So it can be done with mature communication, clear expectations, and a nanny who is willing to accept that her child will be treated as the youngest sibling, having to accommodate and adjust to the employer's kids schedules.
Imagine that. What say the short-sighted selfish parents on this forum who prefer to fire a nanny??"
People do not PREFER to fire a nanny; but not all employers want a nanny to bring her child along. They are paying top dollar for childcare to have exclusive focus on their kid/s.
nannydebsays wrote:Know a nanny who interviewed with parents of infant twins, and was <GASP!> honest about being a newlywed and hoping to have a baby at some point. The employers hired her on the condition that she delay trying until the infant twins were 18 months old. She did, and is still with them today, 5+ years down the road.
She even <HORRORS!> brings her child to work with her, and has since her child was 6 weeks old. And she didn't have her pay cut and has gotten RAISES in the last years of being a nanny/mom.
So it can be done with mature communication, clear expectations, and a nanny who is willing to accept that her child will be treated as the youngest sibling, having to accommodate and adjust to the employer's kids schedules.
nannydebsays wrote:Know a nanny who interviewed with parents of infant twins, and was <GASP!> honest about being a newlywed and hoping to have a baby at some point. The employers hired her on the condition that she delay trying until the infant twins were 18 months old. She did, and is still with them today, 5+ years down the road.
She even <HORRORS!> brings her child to work with her, and has since her child was 6 weeks old. And she didn't have her pay cut and has gotten RAISES in the last years of being a nanny/mom.
So it can be done with mature communication, clear expectations, and a nanny who is willing to accept that her child will be treated as the youngest sibling, having to accommodate and adjust to the employer's kids schedules.
Anonymous wrote:This is ridiculous..She was being honest. Most pregnant women are healthy throughout theit pregnancies and can lift just fine. There's no guarantee about having the same nanny for years. Nannies could get fired or let go because of circumstances whether their own or their bosses. I have seen alot of mb's having children so close together, where the one is barely walking and they're heavily pregnant again. Do we now tell them they can't do that because of whatever illnesses may happen in the 3rd trimester..no one knows how they will feel or the limitations until they get to that part of their pregnancies and you may have overlooked an excellent nanny for your kids based on assumptions