Anonymous wrote:I have never reduced my regular rates to accept a live-in job. Never.
Anonymous wrote:What were you hoping to pay per hour for a live in?
Anonymous wrote:True, I get that to a certain extent but it would simply make much more sense for me to continue to rent out the apartment and just pay more for a live out Nanny as you said.
I do have to disagree that a live in situation is only worth ~$4 less an hour. At the 50 hours a week (200 hours a month) I am requiring her services, you are saying that cost benefit of having her roof, utilities, catv (and food) etc, provided is only worth $800 a month to the Nanny.
While not every Nanny may live in a ~$2,500 apt, you aren't going to find a early 30's woman (or older) living in an apt in DC where her rent, utilities etc only cost her $800 a month.
Thanks for the input
Anonymous wrote:Here's how I would do the math. I think $20/hr is sort of a basic market rate in DC for 1 kid (give or take $5/hr depending on nanny, apparently). The general wise financial advice is not to pay more than 1/3 of your income on housing. So if you figure a $20/hr live out nanny is paying something like $6 of that hourly wage to her rent, then $14/hr for live-in sound pretty much right. Of course, economics being what they are, some people will value this benefit at more than $300/wk and some will value it less than $300/wk. I would think a young type nanny would be more psyched about the pied a terre in the city --- have you looked at sittercity.com?
Of course, IMHO, often the grandma type nannies are better with the babies -- they are going to be less psyched about your basement apartment.
Anonymous wrote:The $18-20 you were getting quoted on top of room and board is too high. That's the cost for live out.
Anonymous wrote:Probably more cost effect to just continue rent it out.
I'm a "NW DC" live-in nanny living in the basement apartment, separate entrance, cable TV, groceries included, set hours (50/week) and making $25/hr.