Anonymous wrote:Again, so if we are all so wrong, OP, what is the hourly wage you will be paying your nanny?
Anonymous wrote:I'm the poster who calculated the less than $11. I'm a CPA and do nanny taxes, so my math IS correct.
you say some weeks there will be less than 50 hours. Great. But what about the weeks that ARE 50? In those weeks you are paying less than $11.
Also, you haven't clarified if the $600 is net or gross.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the poster who calculated the less than $11. I'm a CPA and do nanny taxes, so my math IS correct.
you say some weeks there will be less than 50 hours. Great. But what about the weeks that ARE 50? In those weeks you are paying less than $11.
Also, you haven't clarified if the $600 is net or gross.
It's $600 a month from my pocket to hers. If she chooses to pay taxes on it that will be her choice, I won't force her to do anything she doesn't want to. I want to respect her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP back. Thanks for responses. The Pp who said it was $11/ hour was not correct. Wish people had not just taken her math. Anyway, glad some people thought all the time off and guaranteed pay made it worth it. We only need one nanny so position doesn't need to suit everyone!
? You are talking about 50 hours a week (aside from the summer) 10 of those hours are at time and a half. Legally you are paying less than $11 an hour. Please tell me where my math is wrong.
+ 1 Plus that is calculating that every month only has 20 working days. And I actually did major in math, OP.
You must know that nannies, by law, are hourly workers. There is no flat monthly salary.
+2 Seriously, OP, where is our math wrong?
OP again. Your math is wrong because I offer guaranteed hours. So there are many days, half days, plus the 3 weeks of vacation where I will pay nanny her salary but not expect any work. So when you add all that in it is above $11/hr. Your calculation was based on 50 hours a week, but consider if two day of that week I come home 2 hours early, then it's only 46 hours but for 50 hours of pay. Hope that helps you understand! Thanks to everyone who is supporting me. Everyone else should go find something better to do.
Anonymous wrote:I'm the poster who calculated the less than $11. I'm a CPA and do nanny taxes, so my math IS correct.
you say some weeks there will be less than 50 hours. Great. But what about the weeks that ARE 50? In those weeks you are paying less than $11.
Also, you haven't clarified if the $600 is net or gross.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very reasonable!
I'm one of the "salaried" nannies who has a very similar structure and I love it! I love that I have the exact amount deposited to my checking account twice a month and neither of us have to worry about counting hours. It's just easy! It should also be mentioned that my family is very rarely late! In the last year it's been about three times that I've gotten a "stuck in traffic be home 10 minutes late" text.
I think if they were constantly late or needed my early I would be annoyed since my pay doesn't change.
Good luck!
You are being an idiot, PP. You are accepting the same pay for months that have 23 working days in them, like this month, as you do for months with 20 working days.
With guaranteed hours, which you should have, your pay is never lower than you expect.
Your employers are clearly brighter than you and taking advantage of you.
Anonymous wrote:Very reasonable!
I'm one of the "salaried" nannies who has a very similar structure and I love it! I love that I have the exact amount deposited to my checking account twice a month and neither of us have to worry about counting hours. It's just easy! It should also be mentioned that my family is very rarely late! In the last year it's been about three times that I've gotten a "stuck in traffic be home 10 minutes late" text.
I think if they were constantly late or needed my early I would be annoyed since my pay doesn't change.
Good luck!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP back. Thanks for responses. The Pp who said it was $11/ hour was not correct. Wish people had not just taken her math. Anyway, glad some people thought all the time off and guaranteed pay made it worth it. We only need one nanny so position doesn't need to suit everyone!
? You are talking about 50 hours a week (aside from the summer) 10 of those hours are at time and a half. Legally you are paying less than $11 an hour. Please tell me where my math is wrong.
+ 1 Plus that is calculating that every month only has 20 working days. And I actually did major in math, OP.
You must know that nannies, by law, are hourly workers. There is no flat monthly salary.
+2 Seriously, OP, where is our math wrong?
OP again. Your math is wrong because I offer guaranteed hours. So there are many days, half days, plus the 3 weeks of vacation where I will pay nanny her salary but not expect any work. So when you add all that in it is above $11/hr. Your calculation was based on 50 hours a week, but consider if two day of that week I come home 2 hours early, then it's only 46 hours but for 50 hours of pay. Hope that helps you understand! Thanks to everyone who is supporting me. Everyone else should go find something better to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP back. Thanks for responses. The Pp who said it was $11/ hour was not correct. Wish people had not just taken her math. Anyway, glad some people thought all the time off and guaranteed pay made it worth it. We only need one nanny so position doesn't need to suit everyone!
? You are talking about 50 hours a week (aside from the summer) 10 of those hours are at time and a half. Legally you are paying less than $11 an hour. Please tell me where my math is wrong.
+ 1 Plus that is calculating that every month only has 20 working days. And I actually did major in math, OP.
You must know that nannies, by law, are hourly workers. There is no flat monthly salary.
+2 Seriously, OP, where is our math wrong?