Anonymous wrote:If I was offered only $1-2/hr more for a new additional baby, I'd be departing for a new job. Why work twice as hard for essentially the same money?? That'd be plain stupid.
Anonymous wrote:"If you are paid $15.00 for one child it hardly seems fair to only give you a measly dollar and increase for adding a new baby. It is twice the work"
You are paid for your time, not by the "widget". It's harder work to have 2 kids instead of 1 so you need to offer some more money to keep someone given the increase in responsibility. But the nanny is still only working x hours and is paid on an hourly basis. The reason why you don't need to pay twice as much is that most families with 2 kids at the outset only need to pay a bit more than families with 1 kid in order to attract a nanny. This market reality is what shapes the level of bump in baby raises.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used a pet sitting once and they charged $3.00 per extra an u meal.
That should be animal not u meal.
Anonymous wrote:Are you even aware what minimum wage is? Would you really prefer to be flipping burgers or working at CVS than walking away with cash--$15 is equivalent to 20 or more, sans taxes taken out...
If you're unhappy with your job, go ahead and find another one with your unrealistic expectations...
Anonymous wrote:Are you even aware what minimum wage is? Would you really prefer to be flipping burgers or working at CVS than walking away with cash--$15 is equivalent to 20 or more, sans taxes taken out...
If you're unhappy with your job, go ahead and find another one with your unrealistic expectations...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used a pet sitting once and they charged $3.00 per extra an u meal.
That should be animal not u meal.
Anonymous wrote:I used a pet sitting once and they charged $3.00 per extra an u meal.