Anonymous wrote:Remind your MB whenever possible how much your charged missed her during the day or asked for her. Explain to your MB that preference is often about what the child had in mind that he and nanny were going to do - like go to the park. My charge used to cry when I left for the day - not so much for me but for the fact that I was going outside without him.
Be honest about the nanny/child relationship and tell her how often this has happened before. When a young child sees nanny in the morning it means a day of fun. When a child sees his parents at the end of the day it means dinner, bath and bed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most, not all, mothers are jealous of the nanny-child attachment. Some go so far as to keep switching nannies, just to avoid it. They tend to be insecure with their choice to not be the primary caregiver. Little do they realize the severe permanent damage (unstable caregivers) causes a little child.
Ugh you again? It's time to start singing a new tone dear. Until you back up your tired "severe permanent damage" claim with some actual evidence (not something you googled) give it a rest.
I'm a nanny, before you accuse me of being just another insecure, jealous MB.
You're the one asking about NF, MB, DB, huh?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most, not all, mothers are jealous of the nanny-child attachment. Some go so far as to keep switching nannies, just to avoid it. They tend to be insecure with their choice to not be the primary caregiver. Little do they realize the severe permanent damage (unstable caregivers) causes a little child.
Ugh you again? It's time to start singing a new tone dear. Until you back up your tired "severe permanent damage" claim with some actual evidence (not something you googled) give it a rest.
I'm a nanny, before you accuse me of being just another insecure, jealous MB.
Anonymous wrote:Most, not all, mothers are jealous of the nanny-child attachment. Some go so far as to keep switching nannies, just to avoid it. They tend to be insecure with their choice to not be the primary caregiver. Little do they realize the severe permanent damage (unstable caregivers) causes a little child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of you office 'ladies' may want invest a little time in educating yourselves about early childhood development, bonding and attachment, in particular.
If your children have already suffered multiple primary caregiver severed attachments, all we can do is feel sorry for them.
*to invest
To further inform you... repercussions are likely to suddenly appear as "genetic mental illness" down the road. Of course people will say, "but the parents are so nice."
Think about it ladies, before getting defensive again. You owe it to your children, to do the very best you can with whatever you have available to you.
The seeds of mental illness are often (not always) sown during the formative years, early in life. When caregivers are unstable, unloving, or incompetent, of course there are consequences.
How could you think otherwise?
My "office job" is working as a child psychiatrist. I have no idea where you are getting this from. Winnicott? He really doesn't say that if you read it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of you office 'ladies' may want invest a little time in educating yourselves about early childhood development, bonding and attachment, in particular.
If your children have already suffered multiple primary caregiver severed attachments, all we can do is feel sorry for them.
*to invest
To further inform you... repercussions are likely to suddenly appear as "genetic mental illness" down the road. Of course people will say, "but the parents are so nice."
Think about it ladies, before getting defensive again. You owe it to your children, to do the very best you can with whatever you have available to you.
The seeds of mental illness are often (not always) sown during the formative years, early in life. When caregivers are unstable, unloving, or incompetent, of course there are consequences.
How could you think otherwise?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of you office 'ladies' may want invest a little time in educating yourselves about early childhood development, bonding and attachment, in particular.
If your children have already suffered multiple primary caregiver severed attachments, all we can do is feel sorry for them.
*to invest
To further inform you... repercussions are likely to suddenly appear as "genetic mental illness" down the road. Of course people will say, "but the parents are so nice."
Think about it ladies, before getting defensive again. You owe it to your children, to do the very best you can with whatever you have available to you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of you office 'ladies' may want invest a little time in educating yourselves about early childhood development, bonding and attachment, in particular.
If your children have already suffered multiple primary caregiver severed attachments, all we can do is feel sorry for them.
*to invest
To further inform you... repercussions are likely to suddenly appear as "genetic mental illness" down the road. Of course people will say, "but the parents are so nice."
Think about it ladies, before getting defensive again. You owe it to your children, to do the very best you can with whatever you have available to you.