Anonymous wrote:Because we want our kid to be your primary focus. It's just human nature to look after your own first and then others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I nannied fulltime for years. When i got pregnant with my first I cut my rate by a third and offered childcare for ONE child in my home. Ive never had a problem finding clients, I always have a waiting list. Maybe you are charging too much? I did do a short stint of going to clients house with my baby for about half rate but prefer care in my home now that I have my own.
Basically you switched to an in-home daycare, which makes MUCH more sense. That's what OP should do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our current nanny is a mother of two, but they're in their teens. It can create scheduling problems that we've never had with a childless nanny, but it's workable.
I would not, however, hire a nanny who wanted to bring her own child. I am not interested in subsidizing someone's stay at home parenting decision. So many are women who want to stay home with their babies and decide that they'll "nanny" another child too, at full rates, and I should be grateful for the opportunity for my child to have a playmate brought to the house each day. Nope - not buying it.
Also - huge liability issue. I can get workers comp protection for nanny, but not for nanny's child.
And: equality of opportunities, privileges, etc. I may want my children to be able to go to certain paid activities or have memberships at certain places (think aquarium, pool, etc.). I am not going to pay for nanny's child to attend, and I am not going to alter what I want my kids to do if nanny's kid could not participate. I do not want nanny to be in a position where she'd be making decisions based on what her child versus my child wants to do. If she decides "in favor" of something better for her kid, well that's not why I have a nanny, is it? If she decides "in favor" of my kids, resentment can grow.
I don't want to pay for food for another person in addition to nanny (my kids eat a ton, so don't say it's negligible). I don't want to have to adjust my kids' schedule to accomodate another kid's. I don't want to have to make room in my house for another child's naps or my car for another child's seat. If we wanted another child in our home, we'd have added another to our family. It just in no way is helpful or positive for me as an employer and has only downsides.
These are great reasons. There is zero chance I would hire you, Sorry OP.
Anonymous wrote:I nannied fulltime for years. When i got pregnant with my first I cut my rate by a third and offered childcare for ONE child in my home. Ive never had a problem finding clients, I always have a waiting list. Maybe you are charging too much? I did do a short stint of going to clients house with my baby for about half rate but prefer care in my home now that I have my own.
Anonymous wrote:Because they're selfish. They have a lot of round-about ways of justifying it, but it is because these women are selfish. They want someone 100% devoted to them and their needs. However, by that logic, you'd need a single, nanny with no familial ties at all, or any semblance of a personal life. Every employee has things they prioritize over their job, and to think having a child is some insurmountable challenge that cannot be overcome (and you all are mothers yourselves!!!) is absolutely ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Because they're selfish. They have a lot of round-about ways of justifying it, but it is because these women are selfish. They want someone 100% devoted to them and their needs. However, by that logic, you'd need a single, nanny with no familial ties at all, or any semblance of a personal life. Every employee has things they prioritize over their job, and to think having a child is some insurmountable challenge that cannot be overcome (and you all are mothers yourselves!!!) is absolutely ridiculous.