I agree. One can never pay too much for a good childcare provider.
It is just priceless in my opinion...The luxury of being able to leave your child alone in the company of another adult and to not have to be distracted at work all day worrying about your child's safety, comfort and welfare overall. To be able to focus on your job 100% all day.
Sure, having a nanny is an expensive investment, but the dividends are wonderful.
Obviously. No one would disagree with that but I understood it to be implied. Of course your long term nanny and to be GOOD and a good fit! That is a given. It is also a given that all nanny jobs end.
And I clearly disagree with changing nannies every few years. If you find the right nanny you will not need to and it is not in the best interest of the children. THAT is what this thread is about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I love our current nanny but I honestly (and by honestly I mean don't flame me, it's just my opinion) don't see the value in keeping the same nanny for your kids whole childhood. If it happens great but I don't see it as being any more or less beneficial than other options.
Stability and reliability are always beneficial. This has been proven over and over again. Our children's primary care-giving relationships - with the mother, father, grandparent, nanny - lay the foundation for their future ability to form emotional attachments.
I understand your reasoning, but a nanny is just a caregiver. They aren't family, they aren't there for the important stuff. I can see just as much benefit in having multiple nannies so child learns that there are many people out there that can care for them and help them and love them. Like I said, I just don't see one side or the other as being better or worse.
"Just a caregiver" is the difference between life and death to a dependent child for 50 hours a week. (ie "Nanny has never forgotten to get me at school", "Nanny has never not fed me or made me afraid") so the child can depend on the nanny and feel secure - all this starts all over again with a new nanny.
It isn't about family or long tern relationships (so don't be threatened) it is about the reliability and consistency of constant care.
A swinging door policy can never be good for anyone but especially bad for a very dependent being.
Google a few studies.
This is simply not true.
The issue isn't that the same nanny is the best nanny over the long term. The right nanny for an infant may not be the right nanny for a 4 year old and a NF should not keep an infant nanny for their 4 year old if the fit no longer fits.
It so happens that my DD's nanny has been her sole nanny for her entire life (DD is about to turn 6) and it has been wonderful for us. But there is no way we could have known this when DD was one, or three, and my DD would have been just fine if we had to make a change because her nanny wasn't the most suitable caregiver for her for whatever reason (including that the nanny only wished to work with infants, or whatever.)
In our case, we took it a year at a time. We had conversations, long ones, about DD's upcoming year and challenges and whether our nanny felt like staying on. Of course, I'm glad she did. Of course, I see her as a partner and as close to a co parent as a non spouse can be in the raising of my DD, but that is something that evolved over time and if it hadn't gone that way, it would not have been my fault nor my nanny's. Jobs change and people change. That is normal. One day, we will no longer need a nanny or our nanny will no longer need our family. When that happens, we will all be sad but we will all wish each other well and move on to the next healthy caregiver relationship.
Consistency for consistency's sake is foolish. Solid, appropriate and healthy relationships are the gold standard. If that means a NF changes nannies every year or two, so be it. Same thing for a nanny who changes families. The important thing is fit and mutual happiness.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I love our current nanny but I honestly (and by honestly I mean don't flame me, it's just my opinion) don't see the value in keeping the same nanny for your kids whole childhood. If it happens great but I don't see it as being any more or less beneficial than other options.
Stability and reliability are always beneficial. This has been proven over and over again. Our children's primary care-giving relationships - with the mother, father, grandparent, nanny - lay the foundation for their future ability to form emotional attachments.
I understand your reasoning, but a nanny is just a caregiver. They aren't family, they aren't there for the important stuff. I can see just as much benefit in having multiple nannies so child learns that there are many people out there that can care for them and help them and love them. Like I said, I just don't see one side or the other as being better or worse.
"Just a caregiver" is the difference between life and death to a dependent child for 50 hours a week. (ie "Nanny has never forgotten to get me at school", "Nanny has never not fed me or made me afraid") so the child can depend on the nanny and feel secure - all this starts all over again with a new nanny.
It isn't about family or long tern relationships (so don't be threatened) it is about the reliability and consistency of constant care.
A swinging door policy can never be good for anyone but especially bad for a very dependent being.
Google a few studies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: a nanny is just a caregiver. They aren't there for the important stuff.
This right here tells me everything I need to know about you. In your mind "The important stuff" is the kids' birthday party, or the time you took them to the aquarium on a Saturday. But the reality is that for a young child "the important stuff" isn't the big milestones, it is the hundreds of daily acts of love and service that surround them with a feeling of being known and valued. Some of that comes from mom and dad, and if nanny works relatively short hours, maybe even MOST of it comes from mom and dad. But if you are gone 50+ hours each week, then your nanny plays a HUGE role in building the world your child inhabits. And as kids get older having the same nanny means that their world is consistent through the changes of childhood and it means that "the person picking them up from school" (as you so dismissively refer to the job of caring for older children), is someone who knows them deeply and individually and is better able to help them navigate each new age and the challenges it brings.
Many parents feel that the only way for them to be "the parent" is for them to be the only one in the child's life who is consistent. But the best parents are humble enough to admit when their life circumstances may prevent them from being around often enough to provide all the consistency and love and aupport their kids deserve. These amazing parents are willing to let someone else in to help create a secure and loving home for their kids, even when the parents aren't in it. In return, great nannies invest time and energy in supporting the parent-child bond and smoothing the fabric of their daily routine so that life is easier and better for the entire family. And THAT is the most important stuff of all.
Well said, PP. Happily good mothers know this is true and value it. The poor mothers are threatened by it (and that is most of the vocal mothers on this board) I feel sorry for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: a nanny is just a caregiver. They aren't there for the important stuff.
This right here tells me everything I need to know about you. In your mind "The important stuff" is the kids' birthday party, or the time you took them to the aquarium on a Saturday. But the reality is that for a young child "the important stuff" isn't the big milestones, it is the hundreds of daily acts of love and service that surround them with a feeling of being known and valued. Some of that comes from mom and dad, and if nanny works relatively short hours, maybe even MOST of it comes from mom and dad. But if you are gone 50+ hours each week, then your nanny plays a HUGE role in building the world your child inhabits. And as kids get older having the same nanny means that their world is consistent through the changes of childhood and it means that "the person picking them up from school" (as you so dismissively refer to the job of caring for older children), is someone who knows them deeply and individually and is better able to help them navigate each new age and the challenges it brings.
Many parents feel that the only way for them to be "the parent" is for them to be the only one in the child's life who is consistent. But the best parents are humble enough to admit when their life circumstances may prevent them from being around often enough to provide all the consistency and love and aupport their kids deserve. These amazing parents are willing to let someone else in to help create a secure and loving home for their kids, even when the parents aren't in it. In return, great nannies invest time and energy in supporting the parent-child bond and smoothing the fabric of their daily routine so that life is easier and better for the entire family. And THAT is the most important stuff of all.
Anonymous wrote: a nanny is just a caregiver. They aren't there for the important stuff.
Anonymous wrote:We have had the same nanny for 5 years, through two children. We are about to have our third, and she wants to leave, but is being very passive about making this known to us and is basically making us make that decision. Its disappointing because we've loved having her as part of our family and my children love her. So now we'll have to start over and I look forward to having someone who can again become part of our family.