Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good childcare is expensive, OP, especially for twins. For what you will be making above what you'll need to pay a qualified nanny, you should definitely stay home.
I disagree with this. Stay in the workforce unless you really, really want to be a SAHM. The cost of child care comes out of your total family budget, not one person's salary, and is an investment in your future earnings, your retirement and seniority, and your ability to maintain your position in the workforce.
It is a painful amount of money, but it is only for a brief season of your life. Dropping out of the workforce can turn into a much longer-lived situation.
Also, you have two kids. Daycare is not going to be much cheaper.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. As PPs have noted, my question was about what I can expect to pay. If I can't afford it, I'll consider not going back to work. But I'd rather not start with a set figure and then work backwards into hiring a crappy nanny because I wont pay more for a good one . But I guess I can look at it the other way too: My take-home pay is roughly $65K and I guess I was hoping the total costs for a nanny would be under $50K. Thanks to the PP who listed all associated costs. We don't want our nanny to drive and the babies won't take classes so that'll shave some expenses off.
Anonymous wrote:Good childcare is expensive, OP, especially for twins. For what you will be making above what you'll need to pay a qualified nanny, you should definitely stay home.
Anonymous
No when people state their hourly rate it does not include all the extras. 40 hr a week for six month old twins I would expect to pay around 18-20 per hr. This does not include your employer taxes ect. And your nanny pays her own taxes out of her hourly rate so 18-20 per hr is not her take home pay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op how much a year can you afford and how many hrs per week do you need. That might help to figure out an hourly rate.
wrong, you don't do it like this, you research the market. It's like me going to 7-11 and saying I need 500,000 a year and want to work 2 hours a day. No, you look at the market rate and compare it to what is being offered.
Anonymous wrote:Op how much a year can you afford and how many hrs per week do you need. That might help to figure out an hourly rate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yikes so I need to pay time and a half for anything over 40 hours?
Absolutely.
40 hour at $20 is 41,600 a year before your share of taxes
Health insurance $150 a month is 1800, you don't need to tax it
Yearly bonus 1 week $800, legally has to be taxed
Plus gas reimbursement, petty cash, classes for the childern; let's say comes to 2k for the year
You're looking at 46k before taxes. So I'd say easily around 50k after you get tax breaks/credits.
Add another 15k if you want 50 hours a week.
So somewhere between 50-60k a year
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yikes so I need to pay time and a half for anything over 40 hours?
Absolutely.
40 hour at $20 is 41,600 a year before your share of taxes
Health insurance $150 a month is 1800, you don't need to tax it
Yearly bonus 1 week $800, legally has to be taxed
Plus gas reimbursement, petty cash, classes for the childern; let's say comes to 2k for the year
You're looking at 46k before taxes. So I'd say easily around 50k after you get tax breaks/credits.
Add another 15k if you want 50 hours a week.
So somewhere between 50-60k a year
Hahhaha. What a hoot. DCUM is such a joke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yikes so I need to pay time and a half for anything over 40 hours?
Absolutely.
40 hour at $20 is 41,600 a year before your share of taxes
Health insurance $150 a month is 1800, you don't need to tax it
Yearly bonus 1 week $800, legally has to be taxed
Plus gas reimbursement, petty cash, classes for the childern; let's say comes to 2k for the year
You're looking at 46k before taxes. So I'd say easily around 50k after you get tax breaks/credits.
Add another 15k if you want 50 hours a week.
So somewhere between 50-60k a year