Anonymous wrote:I find it /extremely/ interesting that this was just posted, considering that I just had someone do this to me!! (I nearly posted about it but decided not to, I'm glad someone else did instead). Nevertheless here is my story and take on it:
I am not in the DC area (I'm in another US city, nanny rates are a bit lower here). I went on three interviews in a row (one Tuesday, one wednesday, one Thursday) two weeks ago.
The Tuesday family had nine month old twins and had a /very/ long list of chores I would be responsible for during their nap time, including things like vacuuming the entire house, sanitizing moms breast milk pumping equipment, washing windows, etc, in addition to basic responsibilities (dishes, laundry, preparing baby food, etc). Also DB worked from home and said he was "constantly in and out of the kitchen and living room" (which was the main play area for the kids). They told me their former nanny had had to "suddenly leave due to health issues." They asked my rate and I told them for their job I would require $16/hr.
The Wednesday family had ten month old twins and requested no house work from me at all (aside from "please try to keep it in roughly the same condition as when you arrive, when possible"). They asked my rate and I told them $15/hr.
The Thursday family had one newborn and required no housework. They told me they were offering $15/hr for the position.
I am close with all my references (former MBs) and they all excitedly told me how they spoke highly of me to the Wednesday and Thursday families when they contacted them. However, they (former MBs) went out of their way to tell me that the Tuesday family specifically asked what rate they had paid me. They told me they felt uncomfortable being asked that, and that they did not answer that question.
So, aside, from making my references uncomfortable, what REALLY irritated me about this, is the fact that every single reference I had provided had been for jobs caring for a single child (not twins or even families with more than one child), and none of those positions had required any housework either. Also, because my most recent nanny position lasted three years, three out of four of my references were from positions that were held more than 3 years ago, and since then I've finished my degree in early childhood education, and taken two years of spanish language classes (and gained more professional nanny experience), so it's especially irrelevant what I made in those positions.
The Tuesday family ended up calling and offering me the job, at $15/hr. They said they couldn't afford any more than that (I know that MB was a naturopathic physician and DB was a financial advisor so i find that a bit hard to believe). They also cited the fact that their last nanny (who they raved about, but again, who had "left suddenly due to health concerns") was paid only $13/hr. [And on the subject of my pay with another family with only one child from five years ago being irrelevant; the pay that a different nanny got for the same position also feels irrelevant to me! I have impeccable references, ECE degree, and 13 years of nanny experience; it's hard to top that.]
I also received job offers the same day from the Wednesday and Thursday interview families, at the same pay rate (for a lot less work). It was actually a hard choice between those two families, but obviously I declined the Tuesday family's offer. I was extremely tempted to tell them about the fact that I got two other offers at the same pay rate for a lot less work, but I took the high road and just politely declined.
And, to top it all off, I spoke to a nanny friend of mine, and it turns out that her roommate (who has been unemployed for months and looking for a nanny job, but has only a year or two of very part time childcare experience) had apparently interviewed with the Tuesday family also, and she took the job--at $13/hr! I know she doesn't have much experience but we're talking about twin infants and a lengthy list of household chores here! My nanny friend told me that her roommate has only worked with them for one week and already was complaining about the workload and contemplating quitting! (Gee, really makes me question what happened to their last nanny??)
The point is, only skeezy, cheap, jerk parents resort to something as absurd and petty as asking references their former nanny's pay rate. At least in my experience anyway.
Ok - I admit I only skimmed this essay but I think the point is that you were offered a job at an hourly rate that you didn't want to accept, but you had other offers that were more attractive. You took a job that appealed to you more. Someone else took the job you didn't want. The employers with the twins didn't get you with all your experience but they got someone more affordable who was happy to accept and they have room to give that person raises.
Everyone wins right? That's the free market - if that family wanted you badly enough they had to pay more, but they didn't and found someone else. You got the same hourly rate with less work - so you're happy presumably.
Except that you want to whine. Or you're one of our resident trolls with endless free time to fabricate scenarios on which you can build a rant.