Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just gave an example. Nannies cannot be considered independent contractors. HUGE protection.
Some nannies are actually IC's under IRS law, but that's a different topic. More to our topic, most people consider freedom of choice, the best protection, based on their own personal circumstances.
Anonymous wrote:I just gave an example. Nannies cannot be considered independent contractors. HUGE protection.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is up with some of the nannies on this board? Elite nannies are caring and do this kind of work because they feel it is a calling and not work...Why all the bitter questions and topics getting started, it seems like this is coming from one angry nanny who sounds like they need to get out of the nanny profession and get some professional help.
Many of us do indeed love our work, but make no mistake. It is work.
Do any parents here not earn a living, just because they love their work?
I'm not sure what you mean by some one not earning a living. Are you referring to the $15/hr thread? $15/hr at 40 hr/wk is 31k, and at 50 hr/wk with OT, it's 43k. That's the starting range for Architect. Are you saying architects, receptionists, and others earning $15/hr aren't making a living? That is what a third of American households, not just individuals, earn. If that nanny is the only member of her household, that she's with 1/3 of Americans. If she's one of two earners, then her HHI is at or above the median for American families. I know it's not much, but to say it's on par with making nothing - I don't know what to say to that. If you ever lived off less, maybe you'll have a different perspective.
Do you think being a nanny should be considered a starter job, not a longterm profession? Low pay is appropriate for bottom rung workers, including brand new architects.
Low pay is appropriate for nannies. They are domestic workers, even classified aas such by the government. Professsionals can get 1099'd and not need the protections that nannies do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is up with some of the nannies on this board? Elite nannies are caring and do this kind of work because they feel it is a calling and not work...Why all the bitter questions and topics getting started, it seems like this is coming from one angry nanny who sounds like they need to get out of the nanny profession and get some professional help.
Many of us do indeed love our work, but make no mistake. It is work.
Do any parents here not earn a living, just because they love their work?
I'm not sure what you mean by some one not earning a living. Are you referring to the $15/hr thread? $15/hr at 40 hr/wk is 31k, and at 50 hr/wk with OT, it's 43k. That's the starting range for Architect. Are you saying architects, receptionists, and others earning $15/hr aren't making a living? That is what a third of American households, not just individuals, earn. If that nanny is the only member of her household, that she's with 1/3 of Americans. If she's one of two earners, then her HHI is at or above the median for American families. I know it's not much, but to say it's on par with making nothing - I don't know what to say to that. If you ever lived off less, maybe you'll have a different perspective.
Do you think being a nanny should be considered a starter job, not a longterm profession? Low pay is appropriate for bottom rung workers, including brand new architects.
What "protections" are you referring to?
Low pay is appropriate for nannies. They are domestic workers, even classified aas such by the government. Professsionals can get 1099'd and not need the protections that nannies do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is up with some of the nannies on this board? Elite nannies are caring and do this kind of work because they feel it is a calling and not work...Why all the bitter questions and topics getting started, it seems like this is coming from one angry nanny who sounds like they need to get out of the nanny profession and get some professional help.
Many of us do indeed love our work, but make no mistake. It is work.
Do any parents here not earn a living, just because they love their work?
I'm not sure what you mean by some one not earning a living. Are you referring to the $15/hr thread? $15/hr at 40 hr/wk is 31k, and at 50 hr/wk with OT, it's 43k. That's the starting range for Architect. Are you saying architects, receptionists, and others earning $15/hr aren't making a living? That is what a third of American households, not just individuals, earn. If that nanny is the only member of her household, that she's with 1/3 of Americans. If she's one of two earners, then her HHI is at or above the median for American families. I know it's not much, but to say it's on par with making nothing - I don't know what to say to that. If you ever lived off less, maybe you'll have a different perspective.
Do you think being a nanny should be considered a starter job, not a longterm profession? Low pay is appropriate for bottom rung workers, including brand new architects.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is up with some of the nannies on this board? Elite nannies are caring and do this kind of work because they feel it is a calling and not work...Why all the bitter questions and topics getting started, it seems like this is coming from one angry nanny who sounds like they need to get out of the nanny profession and get some professional help.
Many of us do indeed love our work, but make no mistake. It is work.
Do any parents here not earn a living, just because they love their work?
I'm not sure what you mean by some one not earning a living. Are you referring to the $15/hr thread? $15/hr at 40 hr/wk is 31k, and at 50 hr/wk with OT, it's 43k. That's the starting range for Architect. Are you saying architects, receptionists, and others earning $15/hr aren't making a living? That is what a third of American households, not just individuals, earn. If that nanny is the only member of her household, that she's with 1/3 of Americans. If she's one of two earners, then her HHI is at or above the median for American families. I know it's not much, but to say it's on par with making nothing - I don't know what to say to that. If you ever lived off less, maybe you'll have a different perspective.
Do you think being a nanny should be considered a starter job, not a longterm profession? Low pay is appropriate for bottom rung workers, including brand new architects.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is up with some of the nannies on this board? Elite nannies are caring and do this kind of work because they feel it is a calling and not work...Why all the bitter questions and topics getting started, it seems like this is coming from one angry nanny who sounds like they need to get out of the nanny profession and get some professional help.
Many of us do indeed love our work, but make no mistake. It is work.
Do any parents here not earn a living, just because they love their work?
I'm not sure what you mean by some one not earning a living. Are you referring to the $15/hr thread? $15/hr at 40 hr/wk is 31k, and at 50 hr/wk with OT, it's 43k. That's the starting range for Architect. Are you saying architects, receptionists, and others earning $15/hr aren't making a living? That is what a third of American households, not just individuals, earn. If that nanny is the only member of her household, that she's with 1/3 of Americans. If she's one of two earners, then her HHI is at or above the median for American families. I know it's not much, but to say it's on par with making nothing - I don't know what to say to that. If you ever lived off less, maybe you'll have a different perspective.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What do you mean by entitled? If some one posts a job with the salary range and applicants apply, is this being more entitled than any other employer posting a job, reviewing candidates, and offering it to the top pick?
Agreed. The average nanny salary is what it is. If you want to make more money, go into a higher paying profession.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is up with some of the nannies on this board? Elite nannies are caring and do this kind of work because they feel it is a calling and not work...Why all the bitter questions and topics getting started, it seems like this is coming from one angry nanny who sounds like they need to get out of the nanny profession and get some professional help.
Many of us do indeed love our work, but make no mistake. It is work.
Do any parents here not earn a living, just because they love their work?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What do you mean by entitled? If some one posts a job with the salary range and applicants apply, is this being more entitled than any other employer posting a job, reviewing candidates, and offering it to the top pick?
Agreed. The average nanny salary is what it is. If you want to make more money, go into a higher paying profession.
Anonymous wrote:What do you mean by entitled? If some one posts a job with the salary range and applicants apply, is this being more entitled than any other employer posting a job, reviewing candidates, and offering it to the top pick?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is up with some of the nannies on this board? Elite nannies are caring and do this kind of work because they feel it is a calling and not work...Why all the bitter questions and topics getting started, it seems like this is coming from one angry nanny who sounds like they need to get out of the nanny profession and get some professional help.
Many of us do indeed love our work, but make no mistake. It is work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where I live, nannies are for middle class families. Only working class families use daycares. So your statement is inaccurate.
Please define your idea of middle class.
Oh, $50,000 a year to $500,000 a year or so.
Only 2% of population make over $100,000/yr. $500,000 is not middle class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where I live, nannies are for middle class families. Only working class families use daycares. So your statement is inaccurate.
Please define your idea of middle class.
Oh, $50,000 a year to $500,000 a year or so.