Anonymous wrote:A $5.00-$7.00 increase is ridiculous. You
need to talk with her, but I would say $2.00
an hour increase is fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A $5.00-$7.00 increase is ridiculous. You
need to talk with her, but I would say $2.00
an hour increase is fine.
I'd politely smile, and then get myself a new job.
And your MB would be better for it.
Because 2. an hour is all your infant care is worth. And you wonder why kids are failing and special needs are skyrocketing. Ok.
Nannies must be doing a pretty shitty job (or just be very incompetent) if the prospect of caring for more than one child, without a %30-40 pay raise, is causing children to somehow develop "special needs". Educate yourself, PP, before you post such nonsense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I had another baby I didn't give the nanny a raise, she was already making a fair market rate.
And she was thrilled, no doubt.
I know I would be!! Extra work and no compensation! Sign me up!!
What is the extra work? Clearly you aren't a mother because 2 is honestly easier than one. Plus either way there's really nothing more to do, you just spend 50% less time with the first child and give that to the new one.
Well, I AM a mother, and yes, two are double the labor. For me anyways. I'm not giving less to our first born. So you may speak for yourself.
You should talk to a mom of triplets!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What is the extra work? Clearly you aren't a mother because 2 is honestly easier than one. Plus either way there's really nothing more to do, you just spend 50% less time with the first child and give that to the new one.
This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever read.
Anonymous wrote:
What is the extra work? Clearly you aren't a mother because 2 is honestly easier than one. Plus either way there's really nothing more to do, you just spend 50% less time with the first child and give that to the new one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I had another baby I didn't give the nanny a raise, she was already making a fair market rate.
And she was thrilled, no doubt.
I know I would be!! Extra work and no compensation! Sign me up!!
What is the extra work? Clearly you aren't a mother because 2 is honestly easier than one. Plus either way there's really nothing more to do, you just spend 50% less time with the first child and give that to the new one.
Anonymous wrote:$1/hr more is the standard raise for a new baby.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I had another baby I didn't give the nanny a raise, she was already making a fair market rate.
And she was thrilled, no doubt.
I know I would be!! Extra work and no compensation! Sign me up!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's common to wait until after you're done with maternity leave before giving a raise.
Will your rising two-year-old be in part-time preschool next year? If so, that's a factor in how much you give.
Or you might consider a $1 raise when baby is born, and another $2 when you go back to work.
I think that's crazy ---if you hope to keep that nanny. Please explain your reasoning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, MB here. If you're in the DC area I think a $2/hr raise is appropriate. An hourly rate of $19 is very competitive and still leaves you room for increases/raises etc...
Discuss it with your nanny of course, but I think $2/hr is fair. Got to 3 if you can afford it and she's really fantastic.
Would you double your workload for such a minuscule increase in compensation?