Anonymous wrote:CAnonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
The employers weekly budget sets the rate. And the market. It's seriously that simple.
Exactly if the employer can only afford 1,200 per Month and they need 50 hours a week of care you either take the job or say no thank you.
Perhaps those law breakers need to be jailed. They have to be jailed time YES
Anonymous wrote:X * Y = Z
Z / Y = X
Z / X = Y
rate * weekly hours = weekly pay
weekly pay / weekly hours = rate
weekly pay / rate = weekly hours
all you have to know is two variables to get the third. not difficult in the least.
Anonymous wrote:Sick and tired of bogus payment plans. MB schemes to cheat dumb nannies, is just wrong. I'm sorry.
I don't believe you hire nannies who can't figure out OT.
Pay rate is $20/hr.
Time and a half is:
$20.
+$10.
_______
$30./hr
Did you hire someone who doesn't get that?
Your "blended" rates, your "average" rates, and whatever other creative financing terminology you can whip up, is nothing but an effort to fool the nanny into thinking you're paying more than you are.
Please stop that garbage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you really don't get it. If an employer says $Y a week for X hours, and the contract lays out how that breaks down into an hourly rate and OT, it is legal.
And by the way, in interviewing nannies, we had a very professional experienced nanny offer to reduce her rates in order to get more hours because Her base rate was high, which made overtime very high. She knew full well her "rights" and so do we.
It is business negotiation and as long the total package is above what minimum wage and OT on minimum wage would be, it is legal if both parties agree to it. Easy as that.
Then no need to play with so-called "average" rates during the negotiation process.
no need to talk rates at all, just weekly pay and total hours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you really don't get it. If an employer says $Y a week for X hours, and the contract lays out how that breaks down into an hourly rate and OT, it is legal.
And by the way, in interviewing nannies, we had a very professional experienced nanny offer to reduce her rates in order to get more hours because Her base rate was high, which made overtime very high. She knew full well her "rights" and so do we.
It is business negotiation and as long the total package is above what minimum wage and OT on minimum wage would be, it is legal if both parties agree to it. Easy as that.
Then no need to play with so-called "average" rates during the negotiation process.
Anonymous wrote:OP, you really don't get it. If an employer says $Y a week for X hours, and the contract lays out how that breaks down into an hourly rate and OT, it is legal.
And by the way, in interviewing nannies, we had a very professional experienced nanny offer to reduce her rates in order to get more hours because Her base rate was high, which made overtime very high. She knew full well her "rights" and so do we.
It is business negotiation and as long the total package is above what minimum wage and OT on minimum wage would be, it is legal if both parties agree to it. Easy as that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The employers weekly budget sets the rate. And the market. It's seriously that simple.
Exactly if the employer can only afford 1,200 per Month and they need 50 hours a week of care you either take the job or say no thank you.
Perhaps those law breakers need to be jailed.
Then they better lock up the nannies too. They are both breaking the law. Why discriminate against the employers. If a nanny takes a job for less then minimum wage why not convict her of a serious crime and throw her in prison for 20 to life
Are serious? Minimum wage is an employer's responsibility, not the employee. Getting paid less than minimum wage is not a crime. And it isn't discrimination to go after the person who actually broke the law and had much more power in the situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The employers weekly budget sets the rate. And the market. It's seriously that simple.
Exactly if the employer can only afford 1,200 per Month and they need 50 hours a week of care you either take the job or say no thank you.
Perhaps those law breakers need to be jailed.
Then they better lock up the nannies too. They are both breaking the law. Why discriminate against the employers. If a nanny takes a job for less then minimum wage why not convict her of a serious crime and throw her in prison for 20 to life