Anonymous wrote:Our current AP's "best friend" AP (she met her at a cluster meeting and now they are inseparable) is with a HF that has had 10 au pairs in the last 5 years. I was shocked by this. (Also, sidenote if this BFF AP was our AP, I would rematch. I don't like her. But I don't say anything to our AP because they are friends and it's not like the BFF AP ever watches my kids.)
I've never met the other HF but how the hell do you go through so many au pairs in such a short period? At some point, you have to realize that the AP isn't the issue... it has to be you or your kids. Right?
My understanding is that this HF is fairly wealthy and AP has a vehicle and all the trappings that she "should" and would expect in such an environment. I haven't dug deeper but it does beg some questions.
Anonymous wrote:I totally don't buy this "good fit" concept. Either the HF is a nightmare or the AP. HF may skate for years without being called on it.
And APs may want to rematch because they think they may find an easier family with less hours, older kids, Etc.
I know other disagree.
For example we have heard numerous times on this forum that some HFs don't want the AP around and the AP wants a family that does. Unacceptable for the HF.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Maybe to you. The agencies don't keep lists. It's mostly up to the local coordinators/program directors to help the families find au pairs. AFAIK, there's no central list, and it's very decentralized. And if you have a poor LCC or lazy one, you might not see all the APs available. "
This isn't true at all. All of the major agencies list their available APs on their websites so all families who are searching can see them. Maybe in the past it was so localized but it's not like this anymore. It is true that if an AP has done a good job and the Lcc does not feel that rematch was her fault, the Lcc can work particularly hard to keep her in the local area so she stays near her friends. Sometimes it works out and sometimes it doesn't - there has to be a family available and willing to take any given ap.
Thank you, PP. The poster you corrected seems be "in the know," but is purposefully promoting misinformation.
There is clearly a dark side to this is so-called cultural exchange program. When we have insiders making excuses for bad outcomes, or worse yet, lying about the inner workings of these programs, it appears the writing is on the wall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Maybe to you. The agencies don't keep lists. It's mostly up to the local coordinators/program directors to help the families find au pairs. AFAIK, there's no central list, and it's very decentralized. And if you have a poor LCC or lazy one, you might not see all the APs available. "
This isn't true at all. All of the major agencies list their available APs on their websites so all families who are searching can see them. Maybe in the past it was so localized but it's not like this anymore. It is true that if an AP has done a good job and the Lcc does not feel that rematch was her fault, the Lcc can work particularly hard to keep her in the local area so she stays near her friends. Sometimes it works out and sometimes it doesn't - there has to be a family available and willing to take any given ap.
Thank you, PP. The poster you corrected seems be "in the know," but is purposefully promoting misinformation.
There is clearly a dark side to this is so-called cultural exchange program. When we have insiders making excuses for bad outcomes, or worse yet, lying about the inner workings of these programs, it appears the writing is on the wall.
Anonymous wrote:"Maybe to you. The agencies don't keep lists. It's mostly up to the local coordinators/program directors to help the families find au pairs. AFAIK, there's no central list, and it's very decentralized. And if you have a poor LCC or lazy one, you might not see all the APs available. "
This isn't true at all. All of the major agencies list their available APs on their websites so all families who are searching can see them. Maybe in the past it was so localized but it's not like this anymore. It is true that if an AP has done a good job and the Lcc does not feel that rematch was her fault, the Lcc can work particularly hard to keep her in the local area so she stays near her friends. Sometimes it works out and sometimes it doesn't - there has to be a family available and willing to take any given ap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why should a poor au pair be afraid to report to her agency an unscrupulous family, and risk being sent home as a failure, if the agency fails to rematch her within their two week time limit? Please explain.
Timing and Supply/Demand.
Even if she was the best au pair and the family is the worst...there's no guarantee that the timing would work to find her a new family.
That makes ZERO sense. Every agency keeps a list of people waiting for au pairs, no?
Maybe to you. The agencies don't keep lists. It's mostly up to the local coordinators/program directors to help the families find au pairs. AFAIK, there's no central list, and it's very decentralized. And if you have a poor LCC or lazy one, you might not see all the APs available.
However, look at this way...let's say there's 20 APs in rematch and 20 families in rematch. Those 20 families could take one of the 20 in rematch APs or they could take one out of country, or they can drop out of the program. It's not GUARANTEED that the AP will find another family.
OK?
There's no financial incentive for the LCC to do a rematch, is there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why should a poor au pair be afraid to report to her agency an unscrupulous family, and risk being sent home as a failure, if the agency fails to rematch her within their two week time limit? Please explain.
Timing and Supply/Demand.
Even if she was the best au pair and the family is the worst...there's no guarantee that the timing would work to find her a new family.
That makes ZERO sense. Every agency keeps a list of people waiting for au pairs, no?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why should a poor au pair be afraid to report to her agency an unscrupulous family, and risk being sent home as a failure, if the agency fails to rematch her within their two week time limit? Please explain.
Timing and Supply/Demand.
Even if she was the best au pair and the family is the worst...there's no guarantee that the timing would work to find her a new family.
That makes ZERO sense. Every agency keeps a list of people waiting for au pairs, no?
Let's be clear that not all Au Pairs are in rematch because they were abused by their families. If they were, the family should be kicked out of the program.
I have seen many rematches simply bc the Au Pair was ill-equiped for the job, and perhaps came the USA with different priorities. You are correct, the agency does have records of existing and prospective families, but some families like ours, would rather welcome a new Au Pair from abroad every year.
No, it's not true that abusive parents automatically get kicked out of the program. If you're a woman, you must certainly know that abuse/harassment often boils down to he said, she said. You must admit that, don't you? Moreover, you must admit to the inherent probable consequences of getting labelled as a troublemaker at your workplace or agency.
"Bad timing. You're getting sent home, bad girl. So tell your friends who want to come for a whole year, they had best suck up." Literally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why should a poor au pair be afraid to report to her agency an unscrupulous family, and risk being sent home as a failure, if the agency fails to rematch her within their two week time limit? Please explain.
Timing and Supply/Demand.
Even if she was the best au pair and the family is the worst...there's no guarantee that the timing would work to find her a new family.
That makes ZERO sense. Every agency keeps a list of people waiting for au pairs, no?
Let's be clear that not all Au Pairs are in rematch because they were abused by their families. If they were, the family should be kicked out of the program.
I have seen many rematches simply bc the Au Pair was ill-equiped for the job, and perhaps came the USA with different priorities. You are correct, the agency does have records of existing and prospective families, but some families like ours, would rather welcome a new Au Pair from abroad every year.