Anonymous wrote:This thread is beyond insulting. Why the hell should anyone have to prove to OP (or really anyone besides their employer) why they deserve, oh I'm sorry, have EARNED their bonus? This forum has become beyond judgmental.
OP get off of your high horse.
Anonymous wrote:Also, food for thought:
if the nanny indeed needs to go above and beyond her job duties in order to earn her bonus....
Each year, the nanny will have to "out-do" herself in order to get another bonus.
Year one she has extra time so she cooks dinners for the family and will sometimes help with their laundry.
Year two suddenly those now aren't above and beyond since she's been doing them. Does she take on cleaning to "earn" her bonus?
Anonymous wrote:In nannying, like most jobs, bonuses tend to be given for doing your job well - not necessarily for doing more than your job requires.
As if you'd argue the Wall Street fat cats are getting bonuses because they went above and beyond? No...they get a share in the success of the year, not a bonus because they took on cleaning duties. OP, it only works that way in your head.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just got rid of a PT nanny for not doing her job properly. She did the absolute bare minimum when it came to tidying up for instance, the counters would be sticky, crumbs on the floor. There were other things like never having the kids dinner ready within the timeframe we discussed.
I would give a bonus for the job being done properly. Knowing that I can depend on the nanny, come home to see that the duties have been performed and well, is valuable to me.
See to me, doing the job properly is worth GETTING TO KEEP THE JOB. That's not doing anything worthy of a bonus. Giving someone a bonus for doing what it was agreed they would do is how entitlement is born. I give a bonus for people who go above and beyond.
Anonymous wrote:I just got rid of a PT nanny for not doing her job properly. She did the absolute bare minimum when it came to tidying up for instance, the counters would be sticky, crumbs on the floor. There were other things like never having the kids dinner ready within the timeframe we discussed.
I would give a bonus for the job being done properly. Knowing that I can depend on the nanny, come home to see that the duties have been performed and well, is valuable to me.
Anonymous wrote:19:44 is exactly the type of nanny that didn't earn a bonus. The family would be far better off with one of nannies who can articulate how they exceed expectations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a live in nanny, 3 kids, work 60 hrs with no overtime. Numerous late nights at least 5 a month. Family laundry, sheets, clean/vacuum entire house, dust all while making sure homework is done, baths are given before bed sometimes even put them to bed so I'm basically the nanny/housekeeper . I know most of my nanny friends have a housekeeper come in once a week but I do all of that for them. While its not required they give me a bonus, its nice that they appreciate the extras I do. I think bonuses help with keeping workers motivated all across all jobs. A show of good will, appreciation. Even when I worked in retail I got bonuses and extra perks. If you felt your nanny was not doing that great then its best to give a performance review and see where it goes from there. Or if you can't give a bonus then work out some perks she could enjoy.
That's illegal. Even if you agreed to it, the law supersedes your agreement. You're an idiot.