Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone pay an adult to be your child's "buddy"? Hire an au pair "big sis" type if you want that kind of sitter.
Why would anyone have a young adult live with them when all they need is a babysitter a few hours a week?
Thank you for your post though, you have just proved my point. Your attitude shows how stupid you think it is to play with the child and that is the problem I'm trying to address.
No...that isn't what PP said.
A nanny is, ideally, professionally focused on the raising of healthy, happy children (that aren't her own). Of course she plays with them... she also does her best to create a normal day for the kids. Maybe this means stopping by the grocery store, maybe it means they play independently while she fixes lunch, maybe it means she occasionally answers an important call and asks the kids to entertain themselves for a few minutes. All of the things they learn in those instances - patience, deferred satisfaction, respect for other people's needs, how to behave in public/when someone is on the phone - are important parts of raising a child. You've hired a nanny to HELP raise your children so of course she is going to ensure those lessons are structured into their days. It doesn't mean she isn't also building the biggest sandcastle at the beach or getting herself covered in gloop in the yard; there is time and space enough for all of it.
However, someone who ONLY comes to play with the kids is not helping to raise them in any useful way. The kids learn nothing - not self control, not perseverance, not tolerance or patience or how to manage their own frustrations. PP is correct that someone like that is a babysitter or an AP; a nanny is another bag entirely.