Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:9:40, you're generalizing. I agree that any host family that expects the au pair to eat dinner with them and then clean the whole thing up after them isn't going to have an au pair who wants to eat with the family. I agree that that is not the way the program is supposed to work and I agree that treating someone like that would be terrible. Just because that can (and does) happen doesn't mean that most host families are like that and would never dream of "slowly transfering after dinner responsibilities" to their au pair.
So setting all that aside.
The au pair program presents itself as "be a part of an American family!" It's what many au pairs want. Many au pairs don't want that, and that's fine too. It's one of the things you need to look at and think about when you are matching. But if you are a host family who has presented itself as one who eats dinner together every night and who wants an au pair who wants to spend time with the family, then it's a lovely thing. It's not a thing where the au pair feels obligated or thinks of it as eating with her boss in the workplace. I've heard of au pairs rematching BECAUSE their family didn't include them in stuff like dinners and activities.
Just because that doesn't sound like the kind of relationship you would want, don't assume that others wouldn't. Have you been an au pair? Do you understand what the program is? It's not nanny agency. It's a cultural exchange program too. You're SUPPOSED to be familial with your au pair. If you're not inviting her to dinner with the family, then you're not operating in the spirit of the program.
Yeah I'm generalizing but so are you assuming that this would be every APs dream. I'm just offering another perspective. I have been a live in nanny (at age 19, so AP age) and eating with the family was nice on occasion, but I often found myself doing the brunt of the work while my MB leaned on the counter talking and watching me work. Yes she was familial and a lovely woman, but those dinners weren't as fun as many MBs are thinking they are!
Did you miss where I said this?: "It's what many au pairs want. Many au pairs don't want that, and that's fine too. It's one of the things you need to look at and think about when you are matching." And where I agreed that allowing your au pair to do the "brunt of the work" while leaning on the counter watching is unacceptable?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:9:40, you're generalizing. I agree that any host family that expects the au pair to eat dinner with them and then clean the whole thing up after them isn't going to have an au pair who wants to eat with the family. I agree that that is not the way the program is supposed to work and I agree that treating someone like that would be terrible. Just because that can (and does) happen doesn't mean that most host families are like that and would never dream of "slowly transfering after dinner responsibilities" to their au pair.
So setting all that aside.
The au pair program presents itself as "be a part of an American family!" It's what many au pairs want. Many au pairs don't want that, and that's fine too. It's one of the things you need to look at and think about when you are matching. But if you are a host family who has presented itself as one who eats dinner together every night and who wants an au pair who wants to spend time with the family, then it's a lovely thing. It's not a thing where the au pair feels obligated or thinks of it as eating with her boss in the workplace. I've heard of au pairs rematching BECAUSE their family didn't include them in stuff like dinners and activities.
Just because that doesn't sound like the kind of relationship you would want, don't assume that others wouldn't. Have you been an au pair? Do you understand what the program is? It's not nanny agency. It's a cultural exchange program too. You're SUPPOSED to be familial with your au pair. If you're not inviting her to dinner with the family, then you're not operating in the spirit of the program.
Yeah I'm generalizing but so are you assuming that this would be every APs dream. I'm just offering another perspective. I have been a live in nanny (at age 19, so AP age) and eating with the family was nice on occasion, but I often found myself doing the brunt of the work while my MB leaned on the counter talking and watching me work. Yes she was familial and a lovely woman, but those dinners weren't as fun as many MBs are thinking they are!
Anonymous wrote:9:40, you're generalizing. I agree that any host family that expects the au pair to eat dinner with them and then clean the whole thing up after them isn't going to have an au pair who wants to eat with the family. I agree that that is not the way the program is supposed to work and I agree that treating someone like that would be terrible. Just because that can (and does) happen doesn't mean that most host families are like that and would never dream of "slowly transfering after dinner responsibilities" to their au pair.
So setting all that aside.
The au pair program presents itself as "be a part of an American family!" It's what many au pairs want. Many au pairs don't want that, and that's fine too. It's one of the things you need to look at and think about when you are matching. But if you are a host family who has presented itself as one who eats dinner together every night and who wants an au pair who wants to spend time with the family, then it's a lovely thing. It's not a thing where the au pair feels obligated or thinks of it as eating with her boss in the workplace. I've heard of au pairs rematching BECAUSE their family didn't include them in stuff like dinners and activities.
Just because that doesn't sound like the kind of relationship you would want, don't assume that others wouldn't. Have you been an au pair? Do you understand what the program is? It's not nanny agency. It's a cultural exchange program too. You're SUPPOSED to be familial with your au pair. If you're not inviting her to dinner with the family, then you're not operating in the spirit of the program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there needs to be understanding that if the AP has been with the kids for a long time she may need some down time. Expecting her to immediately jump from working AP role to helping out as a family member (help make dinner and help clean up) isn't really fair to her.
Agree with this. That's part of the problem with this blurry lined setup of employee/family member. No one should HAVE to eat dinner with their boss, nor should they have to work while not being paid. Yes watching your kids and cleaning your dishes is work for her and that doesn't change at 5 o'clock. I also understand the feeling that you shouldn't have to ask a family member for help or pay them for said help when preparing dinner/cleaning up. An arrangement that is agreeable to all parties can be reached of course but try to see it from your APs perspective. You're asking her to eat dinner with her boss and essentially to take her work home with her at the end of the day. You may say you have to take your work home but I'm sure you don't like it, and I'm sure your salary reflects the expectation.
This is an interesting perspective we are getting here - making dinner with the family sound like an awful ordeal and a chore, when I'm sure many families and au pairs enjoy this as part of the cultural exchange of the program: getting to know each other, talk, share food, etc. We are a family that does not have dinner with our au pair very frequently because of our schedules - I get home from work very late, and the kids have to go to sleep soon after I get home. So the kids get fed earlier in the evening (either by the AP or DH, whoever is on "duty" that day at that time), and then the adults eat when they can later in the evening. Our APs have tended to eat soon after they are off duty, or sometimes with the kids if they are responsible for the kids' dinner that day, and then go out or enjoy a quiet evening in their room. We invite them to eat with us (me and DH) later in the evening, but they usually don't take us up on that. (DH and I will usually just collapse in front of the TV for dinner anyway - so it's not really quality "family" time. Though we have had au pairs who like to join us for particular shows each week, and we make it into "family tv night" with dinner, some wine, conversation, etc.) But - I have always felt a little bad that we DON'T have family dinner regularly for the APs to join in. We always make this very clear up front when matching because we assume APs will be disappointed that we don't provide the family dinner experience.
So - hearing so many of you bitter folk make dinner with the family sound like some awful ordeal is pretty interesting. Are you all trolls, APs, or are you host families? I certainly understand the reasons why an AP would not want to have family dinner EVERY night of the week (exhausted, just want to veg out, need a break from being around the kids, etc.), but if the relationship between the AP and the family is good, this seems like it would be a nice part of family life. And I would think that the AP is probably used to helping do a little prep for dinner, or helping clean up afterwards, if she had family dinners back home. Unless the family actually has the AP act as chef and clean-up maid - and I'm sure there are some bad host families out there that require this - family dinner sounds really nice to me.
Anonymous wrote:I can see how the au pair program can be good when a good match is made. However, I also know it's like finding a needle in a haystack. So the potential for abusing the au pair is huge, and she has no recourse, unless she wants to be sent home at her own expense. If not, she has to obey and keep her mouth shut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there needs to be understanding that if the AP has been with the kids for a long time she may need some down time. Expecting her to immediately jump from working AP role to helping out as a family member (help make dinner and help clean up) isn't really fair to her.
Agree with this. That's part of the problem with this blurry lined setup of employee/family member. No one should HAVE to eat dinner with their boss, nor should they have to work while not being paid. Yes watching your kids and cleaning your dishes is work for her and that doesn't change at 5 o'clock. I also understand the feeling that you shouldn't have to ask a family member for help or pay them for said help when preparing dinner/cleaning up. An arrangement that is agreeable to all parties can be reached of course but try to see it from your APs perspective. You're asking her to eat dinner with her boss and essentially to take her work home with her at the end of the day. You may say you have to take your work home but I'm sure you don't like it, and I'm sure your salary reflects the expectation.
Anonymous wrote:I think there needs to be understanding that if the AP has been with the kids for a long time she may need some down time. Expecting her to immediately jump from working AP role to helping out as a family member (help make dinner and help clean up) isn't really fair to her.