Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Nannies, unless otherwise specified if a parent offers you a particular rate then that is your base rate. MBs may argue differently, but there is no such thing as an average rate and your local labor board will agree. If you agreed to say $14/hour and are being paid $14/hour including those over 40, you have a claim to back OT pay, as the labor board will assume $14 is your base rate and $21 your OT rate. However if only a weekly rate was specified, so long as when base and OT are calculated they abide by minimum wage laws, this is legal. Parents and nannies alike should be very careful how they address the hourly rate, base and OT should be specified in writing, and don't just assume someone is talking base/average rate.
I agree. It's wise to again stress that the employer will be legally required to pay up if she hasn't paid the sitter the required OT wages.
You're right, but again, it depends on how things have been worded. There is nothing illegal about backing into a base and OT rate from a weekly amount. What I'm saying is, if everyone agreed to a particular hourly rate, and nowhere was an alternative base and OT rate specified, then the rate agreed upon IS the base rate. If a parent means average rate, they MUST specific actual rates in writing or the nanny has a perfectly legitimate claim to unpaid OT.
Yes, the wording is what's important. Every nanny I interviewed discussed pay as a weekly amount, stressing the importance of guaranteed hours to insure they made a specific weekly amount. I had to spell out how that weekly amount would translate into average and OT per hour, to be sure they understood what they were asking about as an hourly wage, which is important for them to understand as nannies are hourly workers. None of them cared as long as the weekly target was met. If you're a nanny for whom the hourly rate is your measure, fine. Be upfront with it so we can do the appropriate OT calculations and I can decide if you are in my desired range to pay. If not, we part ways. No problem.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, the wording is what's important. Every nanny I interviewed discussed pay as a weekly amount, stressing the importance of guaranteed hours to insure they made a specific weekly amount. I had to spell out how that weekly amount would translate into average and OT per hour, to be sure they understood what they were asking about as an hourly wage, which is important for them to understand as nannies are hourly workers. None of them cared as long as the weekly target was met. If you're a nanny for whom the hourly rate is your measure, fine. Be upfront with it so we can do the appropriate OT calculations and I can decide if you are in my desired range to pay. If not, we part ways. No problem.
Look, you as the employer are responsible to be clear about paid hourly rates and OT wages. Otherwise, you will be the one who will be forced to pay up, not the nanny.
Apparently, your reading comprehension isn't very good. Read the post you're responding to again and try to keep up.
Yes, the wording is what's important. Every nanny I interviewed discussed pay as a weekly amount, stressing the importance of guaranteed hours to insure they made a specific weekly amount. I had to spell out how that weekly amount would translate into average and OT per hour, to be sure they understood what they were asking about as an hourly wage, which is important for them to understand as nannies are hourly workers. None of them cared as long as the weekly target was met. If you're a nanny for whom the hourly rate is your measure, fine. Be upfront with it so we can do the appropriate OT calculations and I can decide if you are in my desired range to pay. If not, we part ways. No problem.
Look, you as the employer are responsible to be clear about paid hourly rates and OT wages. Otherwise, you will be the one who will be forced to pay up, not the nanny.
Anonymous wrote:When I interviewed folks they all spoke in weekly rate terms too. Contract has a base rate to back into the weekly we agreed with nanny but we have never talked about a specific hourly rate - always the weekly amount.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Nannies, unless otherwise specified if a parent offers you a particular rate then that is your base rate. MBs may argue differently, but there is no such thing as an average rate and your local labor board will agree. If you agreed to say $14/hour and are being paid $14/hour including those over 40, you have a claim to back OT pay, as the labor board will assume $14 is your base rate and $21 your OT rate. However if only a weekly rate was specified, so long as when base and OT are calculated they abide by minimum wage laws, this is legal. Parents and nannies alike should be very careful how they address the hourly rate, base and OT should be specified in writing, and don't just assume someone is talking base/average rate.
I agree. It's wise to again stress that the employer will be legally required to pay up if she hasn't paid the sitter the required OT wages.
You're right, but again, it depends on how things have been worded. There is nothing illegal about backing into a base and OT rate from a weekly amount. What I'm saying is, if everyone agreed to a particular hourly rate, and nowhere was an alternative base and OT rate specified, then the rate agreed upon IS the base rate. If a parent means average rate, they MUST specific actual rates in writing or the nanny has a perfectly legitimate claim to unpaid OT.
Yes, the wording is what's important. Every nanny I interviewed discussed pay as a weekly amount, stressing the importance of guaranteed hours to insure they made a specific weekly amount. I had to spell out how that weekly amount would translate into average and OT per hour, to be sure they understood what they were asking about as an hourly wage, which is important for them to understand as nannies are hourly workers. None of them cared as long as the weekly target was met. If you're a nanny for whom the hourly rate is your measure, fine. Be upfront with it so we can do the appropriate OT calculations and I can decide if you are in my desired range to pay. If not, we part ways. No problem.
Anonymous wrote:I'm in this situation now. I work 52 hours a week, all paid at my regular rate. Unfortunately I think the difference in my pay for overtime might make a nanny too expensive for the family, and I'd rather keep my job making good money than complain about the overtime amount that should be paid. I know, horrifying, but this is the reality of it.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Nannies, unless otherwise specified if a parent offers you a particular rate then that is your base rate. MBs may argue differently, but there is no such thing as an average rate and your local labor board will agree. If you agreed to say $14/hour and are being paid $14/hour including those over 40, you have a claim to back OT pay, as the labor board will assume $14 is your base rate and $21 your OT rate. However if only a weekly rate was specified, so long as when base and OT are calculated they abide by minimum wage laws, this is legal. Parents and nannies alike should be very careful how they address the hourly rate, base and OT should be specified in writing, and don't just assume someone is talking base/average rate.
I agree. It's wise to again stress that the employer will be legally required to pay up if she hasn't paid the sitter the required OT wages.
You're right, but again, it depends on how things have been worded. There is nothing illegal about backing into a base and OT rate from a weekly amount. What I'm saying is, if everyone agreed to a particular hourly rate, and nowhere was an alternative base and OT rate specified, then the rate agreed upon IS the base rate. If a parent means average rate, they MUST specific actual rates in writing or the nanny has a perfectly legitimate claim to unpaid OT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely not saying that there aren't nannies who aren't paid appropriately, but you might want to make sure of what the hourly rate is if a parent quotes you a weekly or monthly rate. If they are paying, say $1,000 a week for 55 hours, the rate is not a straight $1000/55 = $18. They are probably calculating it as (40 x rate) + (15 x rate x 1.5) = $1,000. In which case the rate would be $16.
If that's what they were doing, it'd be in the contract and there would be no confusion. Nice try.
I'm not saying this is or isn't what anyone is doing and I don't agree that this is always specifically in the contract. You also realize that a lot of nannies don't even seem to have contracts? I'm saying watch out for that. If an employer quotes you a rate that isn't gross hourly and guaranteed, make sure you ask questions to figure out exactly what it will mean for net pay.
How an employer arrives at the gross rate has nothing at all to do with what that gross rate translate to in net pay. Net pay is a function of the nanny's own tax obligations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely not saying that there aren't nannies who aren't paid appropriately, but you might want to make sure of what the hourly rate is if a parent quotes you a weekly or monthly rate. If they are paying, say $1,000 a week for 55 hours, the rate is not a straight $1000/55 = $18. They are probably calculating it as (40 x rate) + (15 x rate x 1.5) = $1,000. In which case the rate would be $16.
If that's what they were doing, it'd be in the contract and there would be no confusion. Nice try.
I'm not saying this is or isn't what anyone is doing and I don't agree that this is always specifically in the contract. You also realize that a lot of nannies don't even seem to have contracts? I'm saying watch out for that. If an employer quotes you a rate that isn't gross hourly and guaranteed, make sure you ask questions to figure out exactly what it will mean for net pay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nannies, unless otherwise specified if a parent offers you a particular rate then that is your base rate. MBs may argue differently, but there is no such thing as an average rate and your local labor board will agree. If you agreed to say $14/hour and are being paid $14/hour including those over 40, you have a claim to back OT pay, as the labor board will assume $14 is your base rate and $21 your OT rate. However if only a weekly rate was specified, so long as when base and OT are calculated they abide by minimum wage laws, this is legal. Parents and nannies alike should be very careful how they address the hourly rate, base and OT should be specified in writing, and don't just assume someone is talking base/average rate.
I agree. It's wise to again stress that the employer will be legally required to pay up if she hasn't paid the sitter the required OT wages.
Anonymous wrote:Nannies, unless otherwise specified if a parent offers you a particular rate then that is your base rate. MBs may argue differently, but there is no such thing as an average rate and your local labor board will agree. If you agreed to say $14/hour and are being paid $14/hour including those over 40, you have a claim to back OT pay, as the labor board will assume $14 is your base rate and $21 your OT rate. However if only a weekly rate was specified, so long as when base and OT are calculated they abide by minimum wage laws, this is legal. Parents and nannies alike should be very careful how they address the hourly rate, base and OT should be specified in writing, and don't just assume someone is talking base/average rate.
Anonymous wrote:This is why nannies need to be careful when comparing rates at the playground. An $18 per hour average rate is very different from an $18 per hour base rate with time and a half after 40 hours. Many nannies would price themselves right out of their jobs if they tried to make their average rate a base rate and then add time-and-a-half after 40 hours on top of that.