Anonymous wrote:No. Not really. No one here will support that, even though certain nannies are legally ICs.
Anonymous wrote:My sitter is an independent contractor, but she controls the schedule. If she doesn't want to work, she just doesn't come in. Plus, she tells me what hours she wants or doesn't want. The schedule is never regular or set...it just depends on her. Of course, this has made for some very awkward sitting dilemmas for me....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My sitter is an independent contractor, but she controls the schedule. If she doesn't want to work, she just doesn't come in. Plus, she tells me what hours she wants or doesn't want. The schedule is never regular or set...it just depends on her. Of course, this has made for some very awkward sitting dilemmas for me....
Um, no. She isn't an IC. No matter how much you want it to be true.
She controls nothing. You just have no concept of how to hire a competent worker.
Anonymous wrote:My sitter is an independent contractor, but she controls the schedule. If she doesn't want to work, she just doesn't come in. Plus, she tells me what hours she wants or doesn't want. The schedule is never regular or set...it just depends on her. Of course, this has made for some very awkward sitting dilemmas for me....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was thinking that I could consider nanny as an independent contractor and therefore she would pay her own taxes.
The law is very clear about nannies being household employees NOT independent contractors. It sounds like you're looking to avoid paying your fair share of employer taxes. Many nannies (who do things the legal way) see this as a red flag.
This isn't necessarily true - if the nanny is not working FT, the argument is much more in favor of independent contractor than FT employee. I am an employment lawyer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was thinking that I could consider nanny as an independent contractor and therefore she would pay her own taxes.
The law is very clear about nannies being household employees NOT independent contractors. It sounds like you're looking to avoid paying your fair share of employer taxes. Many nannies (who do things the legal way) see this as a red flag.
This isn't necessarily true - if the nanny is not working FT, the argument is much more in favor of independent contractor than FT employee. I am an employment lawyer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was thinking that I could consider nanny as an independent contractor and therefore she would pay her own taxes.
The law is very clear about nannies being household employees NOT independent contractors. It sounds like you're looking to avoid paying your fair share of employer taxes. Many nannies (who do things the legal way) see this as a red flag.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A nanny is definitely NOT an independent contractor. Calling her that doesn't make it so, sorry.
http://blog.nettimesolutions.com/employers-misclassifying-independent-contractors/?goback=.gde_39688_member_257764227.gna_39688
Many of the newborn nannies are ICs. That's a fact.
They have many clients a year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A nanny is definitely NOT an independent contractor. Calling her that doesn't make it so, sorry.
http://blog.nettimesolutions.com/employers-misclassifying-independent-contractors/?goback=.gde_39688_member_257764227.gna_39688
Many of the newborn nannies are ICs. That's a fact.
Anonymous wrote:If I indicate in the contract that nanny has to pay her own taxes is that sufficient in avoiding problems later or do I have to pay nanny taxes? What is the law on that in DC?