Anonymous wrote:I'm also sorry to hear this happened to you 19:05. Very sorry. I also agree with the PP that nannies don't avoid negotiating this benefit out of duplicity. They do so out of ignorance.
Where I disagree with the PP is in her inherent assumption that guaranteed hours are so standard that not assuming them makes a family worthy of shame. Basically, she is accusing families of duplicity. Not true. I'm 15:10 and I, as well as others, have posted exactly why it isn't standard or understood as a deal killer unless a nanny specifies and advocates for this.
Seriously, nannies, stop acting like victims who believe certain things are a given. Nothing in the world is a given and you need to step up and stop whining and bargain for what you think you are worth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a nanny for the last 13 years. I worked for numerous families. Maybe i was lucky i don't know. Every single family paid me guaranteed hours. It was never ever an issue until today. I have a contract with my present family. Usually I had 2 weeks paid vacation with every families. BUT if they came home earlier or they didn't need me for a day because they wanted to spend it with their kids or a sudden trip came up or a few snow days. They ALWAYS paid. The only time they didn't pay when I asked a day off. BUT that was perfectly understandable for me. Today my boss told me they will go away for two weeks in the summer and they won't pay. They already paid one week in March when they went to Florida. BUT this is only one week paid yet. I love their kids. But They didn't pay me for 10 days when it was the storm Sandy. The reasoning was: " We don't feel it would be fair to pay you when you didn't come to work". It wasn't my fault I didn't go. I couldn't get to their house! And anyway most of the time they were not home without electricity. And now this is the second "blow" in 7 months. I don't blame on anybody. I never put that in the contract because it was NEVER an issue before.... Now I learned my lesson on a hard way after that many years. Sorry for my venting but it had to come out....I hope anybody else learned a lessonJust like me. It makes me feel kind of sad that people are doing that with somebody who helps them to raise their kids.....
This is so sad when you have given your heart and soul to these children. You are just another business deal to them. So sad. Most of us have been there. I hope you get a much better job with parents who appreciate your work.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a nanny for the last 13 years. I worked for numerous families. Maybe i was lucky i don't know. Every single family paid me guaranteed hours. It was never ever an issue until today. I have a contract with my present family. Usually I had 2 weeks paid vacation with every families. BUT if they came home earlier or they didn't need me for a day because they wanted to spend it with their kids or a sudden trip came up or a few snow days. They ALWAYS paid. The only time they didn't pay when I asked a day off. BUT that was perfectly understandable for me. Today my boss told me they will go away for two weeks in the summer and they won't pay. They already paid one week in March when they went to Florida. BUT this is only one week paid yet. I love their kids. But They didn't pay me for 10 days when it was the storm Sandy. The reasoning was: " We don't feel it would be fair to pay you when you didn't come to work". It wasn't my fault I didn't go. I couldn't get to their house! And anyway most of the time they were not home without electricity. And now this is the second "blow" in 7 months. I don't blame on anybody. I never put that in the contract because it was NEVER an issue before.... Now I learned my lesson on a hard way after that many years. Sorry for my venting but it had to come out....I hope anybody else learned a lessonJust like me. It makes me feel kind of sad that people are doing that with somebody who helps them to raise their kids.....
You've touched on an important point PP, which is that most families can and do come up with an annual budget for childcare. That budget can be sliced up in any number of ways based on the nanny's priorities. She wants insurance and PTO? No problem, but the cost of those perks will probably be reflected in a lower hourly rate. She doesn't care about PTO but has a fixation on being able to tell people that she gets $20 per hour? Fine, because money and PTO are usually fungible from the parents perspective.
So the problem is not that families can't budget for guaranteed weekly pay, and it is not that the request itself is unreasonable. The problem is that nannies deprive the employer of the opportunity to budget for it by failing to clearly make the request until after the parents have agreed to an hourly rate request, effectively applying their child care budget solely to that one form of compensation. And many parents are truly blindsided by the request when it arises a few months into the nanny's tenure, because in most segments of the economy, an hourly rate job as opposed to a salaried job means the employee gets paid only when she actually works.
This is a really good post, PP, and might help nannies better understand the negotiating process from the family's perspective. Thank you.
I understand it from your point of view. I also believe it should be discussed up front. It does continue to boggle my mind that parents need to be told that not paying the nanny because YOU chose to go on vacation will be a hardship to your nanny and may cost you your childcare. I understand the budget can be worked out in a number of ways, it just seems that pay for 52 weeks per year is a given. This is a person we are talking about not a robot you turn off before skipping town.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You've touched on an important point PP, which is that most families can and do come up with an annual budget for childcare. That budget can be sliced up in any number of ways based on the nanny's priorities. She wants insurance and PTO? No problem, but the cost of those perks will probably be reflected in a lower hourly rate. She doesn't care about PTO but has a fixation on being able to tell people that she gets $20 per hour? Fine, because money and PTO are usually fungible from the parents perspective.
So the problem is not that families can't budget for guaranteed weekly pay, and it is not that the request itself is unreasonable. The problem is that nannies deprive the employer of the opportunity to budget for it by failing to clearly make the request until after the parents have agreed to an hourly rate request, effectively applying their child care budget solely to that one form of compensation. And many parents are truly blindsided by the request when it arises a few months into the nanny's tenure, because in most segments of the economy, an hourly rate job as opposed to a salaried job means the employee gets paid only when she actually works.
This is a really good post, PP, and might help nannies better understand the negotiating process from the family's perspective. Thank you.
I understand it from your point of view. I also believe it should be discussed up front. It does continue to boggle my mind that parents need to be told that not paying the nanny because YOU chose to go on vacation will be a hardship to your nanny and may cost you your childcare. I understand the budget can be worked out in a number of ways, it just seems that pay for 52 weeks per year is a given. This is a person we are talking about not a robot you turn off before skipping town.
Anonymous wrote:You've touched on an important point PP, which is that most families can and do come up with an annual budget for childcare. That budget can be sliced up in any number of ways based on the nanny's priorities. She wants insurance and PTO? No problem, but the cost of those perks will probably be reflected in a lower hourly rate. She doesn't care about PTO but has a fixation on being able to tell people that she gets $20 per hour? Fine, because money and PTO are usually fungible from the parents perspective.
So the problem is not that families can't budget for guaranteed weekly pay, and it is not that the request itself is unreasonable. The problem is that nannies deprive the employer of the opportunity to budget for it by failing to clearly make the request until after the parents have agreed to an hourly rate request, effectively applying their child care budget solely to that one form of compensation. And many parents are truly blindsided by the request when it arises a few months into the nanny's tenure, because in most segments of the economy, an hourly rate job as opposed to a salaried job means the employee gets paid only when she actually works.
This is a really good post, PP, and might help nannies better understand the negotiating process from the family's perspective. Thank you.
You've touched on an important point PP, which is that most families can and do come up with an annual budget for childcare. That budget can be sliced up in any number of ways based on the nanny's priorities. She wants insurance and PTO? No problem, but the cost of those perks will probably be reflected in a lower hourly rate. She doesn't care about PTO but has a fixation on being able to tell people that she gets $20 per hour? Fine, because money and PTO are usually fungible from the parents perspective.
So the problem is not that families can't budget for guaranteed weekly pay, and it is not that the request itself is unreasonable. The problem is that nannies deprive the employer of the opportunity to budget for it by failing to clearly make the request until after the parents have agreed to an hourly rate request, effectively applying their child care budget solely to that one form of compensation. And many parents are truly blindsided by the request when it arises a few months into the nanny's tenure, because in most segments of the economy, an hourly rate job as opposed to a salaried job means the employee gets paid only when she actually works.
Anonymous wrote:I am the earlier poster re: trips to Cancun and aspen but it is a good point PP that points to why this needs to be part of the contract so it is clearly spelled out for both sides. Also agree that not negotiating for guaranteed hours up front in the hope your MB will later just agree is in very bad faith. That said it still strikes me as odd that an employer is oblivious to the budget pressure that no pay for weeks on end will wreak on a nanny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"not standard at all"
MB here - I agree it needs to be negotiated. However I think it is "standard" in the sense that it is commonly granted. Just as paid holidays are "standard" in that they are commonly given in this area although that must still be negotiated.
Frankly this strikes me as a really weird issue. If you have enough money for multiple weeks of vacation every year (well beyond 2) it amazes me that you cannot also budget to pay your nanny each week. "Sorry, we need to go so Aspen for 2 weeks and then to Cancun for another 1 - see you when we're back!!" I'm sure that goes over great.
+1 I don't get why this is such a common issue. Isn't paying your nanny part of your budget? Are you intending to redirect that money for vacations? If that's what you have to do to pay for vacations, perhaps you can't afford them. You'd basically have your nanny paying for your vacation. Not cool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"not standard at all"
MB here - I agree it needs to be negotiated. However I think it is "standard" in the sense that it is commonly granted. Just as paid holidays are "standard" in that they are commonly given in this area although that must still be negotiated.
Frankly this strikes me as a really weird issue. If you have enough money for multiple weeks of vacation every year (well beyond 2) it amazes me that you cannot also budget to pay your nanny each week. "Sorry, we need to go so Aspen for 2 weeks and then to Cancun for another 1 - see you when we're back!!" I'm sure that goes over great.
+1 I don't get why this is such a common issue. Isn't paying your nanny part of your budget? Are you intending to redirect that money for vacations? If that's what you have to do to pay for vacations, perhaps you can't afford them. You'd basically have your nanny paying for your vacation. Not cool.
Anonymous wrote:"not standard at all"
MB here - I agree it needs to be negotiated. However I think it is "standard" in the sense that it is commonly granted. Just as paid holidays are "standard" in that they are commonly given in this area although that must still be negotiated.
Frankly this strikes me as a really weird issue. If you have enough money for multiple weeks of vacation every year (well beyond 2) it amazes me that you cannot also budget to pay your nanny each week. "Sorry, we need to go so Aspen for 2 weeks and then to Cancun for another 1 - see you when we're back!!" I'm sure that goes over great.