Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP is probably not getting a raise because the workload is reducing and the family's need for her is decreasing. From her post it doesn't sound like she has any duties beyond light nanny ones (kids laundry, cleaning up after yourself and the kids is the lowest threshold). Her charges are 3 and 5 now. $850 a week for a 3 and 5 year old is pretty close to the ceiling where most parents will start considering using before or aftercare if they are in a good preschool and school. Some parents use this time to switch to a nanny/housekeeper who provides more value and would be less than $850 a week. Other families might consider an au pair or even just a part time nanny.
I just think that its less likely that the OP is going to get $900 a week for 2 school age kids, very few duties, more time off as the 3 year increases preschool time, and additional paid holidays. Good luck if you do get it but with the ages of your charges, your rate, and low duties I would be more worried about whether they plan to keep you in the fall.
+1 It sounds like you've hit your ceiling with this family and should start looking for ways to increase your value/expand your duties or accept that its time to move on to a family that needs you. Four years is a pretty good run! There's nothing wrong with acknowledging that its time to move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Umm...that doesn't sound bad to me at all. My husband is a COO of a non fed company and those, plus July 4th,are the only holidays he gets off.
Bet he makes $17/hr too, huh?
Sorry, allow me to explain why this is a valid criticism --
I bet he only gets 2 sick days too, right?
And can only take one week of vacation at a time?
And if he got really sick and missed three or four weeks of work, he'd probably find himself destitute and struggling to pay his rent and worrying about the security of his job, right?
No?
Oh, then your comparison is irrelevant.
Anonymous wrote:Umm...that doesn't sound bad to me at all. My husband is a COO of a non fed company and those, plus July 4th,are the only holidays he gets off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Umm...that doesn't sound bad to me at all. My husband is a COO of a non fed company and those, plus July 4th,are the only holidays he gets off.
Bet he makes $17/hr too, huh?
Anonymous wrote:Umm...that doesn't sound bad to me at all. My husband is a COO of a non fed company and those, plus July 4th,are the only holidays he gets off.
Anonymous wrote:OP here ! The 5 year old start pre-K in fall 9 to 3pm the 3 year old would be with me full time. About the federal days I have memorial, labor, thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year's Day and Presidents' Day the rest of the federal I have to work. Thank you everybody!
Anonymous wrote:OP is probably not getting a raise because the workload is reducing and the family's need for her is decreasing. From her post it doesn't sound like she has any duties beyond light nanny ones (kids laundry, cleaning up after yourself and the kids is the lowest threshold). Her charges are 3 and 5 now. $850 a week for a 3 and 5 year old is pretty close to the ceiling where most parents will start considering using before or aftercare if they are in a good preschool and school. Some parents use this time to switch to a nanny/housekeeper who provides more value and would be less than $850 a week. Other families might consider an au pair or even just a part time nanny.
I just think that its less likely that the OP is going to get $900 a week for 2 school age kids, very few duties, more time off as the 3 year increases preschool time, and additional paid holidays. Good luck if you do get it but with the ages of your charges, your rate, and low duties I would be more worried about whether they plan to keep you in the fall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You should have at least 10 fed holidays and 3-5 PTO days.
She has 2 weeks vacation, 2 sick days, and 2 holidays. That's 14 days. It's not that bad. If you want to negotiate for more, ask for it, but again, come up with an explanation other than "this is what I SHOULD get"