Anonymous wrote:So there are only a few celebrity nannies and a few celebrity jobs making six figures to employ them. That would make mentioning these outliers pretty irrelevant to this discussion, right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was travel part of the expectations for this job? Or short-notice availability? Those are more standard in "high-profile," high-pay jobs, but should be spelled out as part of the hiring agreement.

Those jobs pay a minimum of $100,000., in which case nanny doesn't complain too much. If parents really want 24/7 from one person, it's more like $300,000.

I don't know where you got your figures from, but as someone who has worked a job of that nature I can assure you that you're not going to find a $300,000 24/7 nanny job. Such jobs usually don't pay a minimum of $100,000 either...it's usually quite a bit less. The job I worked did have short-notice travel that could last a few weeks, but in return I was granted a sufficient amount of time off when we returned to make up for working 24/7 for 3 weeks straight. When we returned the other nanny would take over for a week or so to give me some personal time to catch up on things (appointments, friends, etc...)

If you like, you can google celebrity nannies.

Celebrity nanny jobs are few an far between (thank goodness). I've worked two high profile jobs, and interviewed for quite a few others. They are not all they are cracked up to be, and only one offered a salary over $100,000. Most included extensive travel. They can be exhausting jobs, but also worth it in the short term if one is trying to save up some money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was travel part of the expectations for this job? Or short-notice availability? Those are more standard in "high-profile," high-pay jobs, but should be spelled out as part of the hiring agreement.

Those jobs pay a minimum of $100,000., in which case nanny doesn't complain too much. If parents really want 24/7 from one person, it's more like $300,000.

I don't know where you got your figures from, but as someone who has worked a job of that nature I can assure you that you're not going to find a $300,000 24/7 nanny job. Such jobs usually don't pay a minimum of $100,000 either...it's usually quite a bit less. The job I worked did have short-notice travel that could last a few weeks, but in return I was granted a sufficient amount of time off when we returned to make up for working 24/7 for 3 weeks straight. When we returned the other nanny would take over for a week or so to give me some personal time to catch up on things (appointments, friends, etc...)

If you like, you can google celebrity nannies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was travel part of the expectations for this job? Or short-notice availability? Those are more standard in "high-profile," high-pay jobs, but should be spelled out as part of the hiring agreement.

Those jobs pay a minimum of $100,000., in which case nanny doesn't complain too much. If parents really want 24/7 from one person, it's more like $300,000.

I don't know where you got your figures from, but as someone who has worked a job of that nature I can assure you that you're not going to find a $300,000 24/7 nanny job. Such jobs usually don't pay a minimum of $100,000 either...it's usually quite a bit less. The job I worked did have short-notice travel that could last a few weeks, but in return I was granted a sufficient amount of time off when we returned to make up for working 24/7 for 3 weeks straight. When we returned the other nanny would take over for a week or so to give me some personal time to catch up on things (appointments, friends, etc...)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was travel part of the expectations for this job? Or short-notice availability? Those are more standard in "high-profile," high-pay jobs, but should be spelled out as part of the hiring agreement.

Those jobs pay a minimum of $100,000., in which case nanny doesn't complain too much. If parents really want 24/7 from one person, it's more like $300,000.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was travel part of the expectations for this job? Or short-notice availability? Those are more standard in "high-profile," high-pay jobs, but should be spelled out as part of the hiring agreement.

Those jobs pay a minimum of $100,000., in which case nanny doesn't complain too much. If parents really want 24/7 from one person, it's more like $300,000.

LOL I'm not a nanny but I'm showing this to my DH so he can start paying me ..

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was travel part of the expectations for this job? Or short-notice availability? Those are more standard in "high-profile," high-pay jobs, but should be spelled out as part of the hiring agreement.

Those jobs pay a minimum of $100,000., in which case nanny doesn't complain too much. If parents really want 24/7 from one person, it's more like $300,000.

Anonymous wrote:Even if the job did have the expectation of short term notice for travel availability, how inconsiderate is it to wait until the last minute to let her know about your plans if the parents already knew they'd be going?? That still shows a disrespect for OPs personal life, and I wouldn't allow it. It doesn't seem like OP has one of those 24 hour, be ready to travel at the drop of a hat type jobs. If she did, this wouldn't be such a surprise.

Anonymous wrote:Was travel part of the expectations for this job? Or short-notice availability? Those are more standard in "high-profile," high-pay jobs, but should be spelled out as part of the hiring agreement.